They are letting them go

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

Where did you find that info?

Common sense.

See the post above yours.

So no sources. Again, you were talking out of your ass.

Imagine that.

a reply to: watchitburn

If anything the DA and the judge should be looked at about why bail was granted.

As far as I'm aware judges don't usually deny bail for cases of child abuse, which is what they are charged with. It would then be up to the officers involved to present evidence showing the arrested would pose a threat to the community if they were released. In this case it sounds like LEO were not able to provide sufficient evidence outside of the child abuse.

While most may not agree with the decision, it was the right one.

a reply to: introvert

Someone truly is.

pjmedia.com...

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: watchitburn

If anything the DA and the judge should be looked at about why bail was granted.

As far as I'm aware judges don't usually deny bail for cases of child abuse, which is what they are charged with. It would then be up to the officers involved to present evidence showing the arrested would pose a threat to the community if they were released. In this case it sounds like LEO were not able to provide sufficient evidence outside of the child abuse.

While most may not agree with the decision, it was the right one.

I guess finding a dead child on the compound isn't enough?

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

Someone truly is.

pjmedia.com...

Still no proof of your claims, huh?

Honestly, I do not know why I even asked.

You are known for fabricating lies and bull#.

a reply to: introvert

What part of this was confusing?

Muslim Extremist Arrested at New Mexico Compound Is the Son of Terror-Linked NYC Imam

a reply to: galaga

Sadly, no. Considering they were only charged with child abuse that would indicate that LEO believe the child died from neglect. So based on the evidence, the only threat these people pose is to their own children. They've already lost custody of them so, once again based on the evidence presented, they don't pose a threat to anyone.

Like I said before, we may not like it but the judge made the right decision.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: watchitburn

If anything the DA and the judge should be looked at about why bail was granted.

As far as I'm aware judges don't usually deny bail for cases of child abuse, which is what they are charged with. It would then be up to the officers involved to present evidence showing the arrested would pose a threat to the community if they were released. In this case it sounds like LEO were not able to provide sufficient evidence outside of the child abuse.

While most may not agree with the decision, it was the right one.

Everyone in this thread seems to be forgetting that they found the dead body of a child buried on the property.....

ETA: nevermind! 😳

originally posted by: neo96
Should kept been kept in custody until the remains were identified.

That's is a good question. WHO paid?

5 @ $20 grand bond = $100,000.

They certainly did not have the means.

It's more like 10,000.

You only need 20%.

Each was $20,000.

So each got out for 2 grand.

a reply to: galaga

Which is kind of much more outrageous.
Murder conspiracy to commit terrorism and child abuse and two grand for Freedom till they sort everything out

The child died durring a religious ritual.

That's not neglect. That's murder.

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: galaga

Which is kind of much more outrageous.
Murder conspiracy to commit terrorism and child abuse and two grand for Freedom till they sort everything out

Exactly.

a reply to: KansasGirl

See my previous post. Even murderers get released on bail if it can be shown they don't present an immediate threat to the community. At this point it seems like investigators don't even have enough evidence to say the child died from anything other than natural causes. If they did they would be charging the the accused with something more serious than child abuse.

a reply to: galaga

Still didn't look like they had $10 grand just laying around.

a reply to: galaga

Do you have proof of that? As far as I'm aware they haven't even identified the remains, let alone cause of death.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: galaga

Do you have proof of that? As far as I'm aware they haven't even identified the remains, let alone cause of death.

right here

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

What part of this was confusing?

Muslim Extremist Arrested at New Mexico Compound Is the Son of Terror-Linked NYC Imam

It's not confusing. You made a claim about a handler and the bond.

When asked about that, you deflect.

As always, you're dishonest Neo.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: galaga

Sadly, no. Considering they were only charged with child abuse that would indicate that LEO believe the child died from neglect. So based on the evidence, the only threat these people pose is to their own children. They've already lost custody of them so, once again based on the evidence presented, they don't pose a threat to anyone.

Like I said before, we may not like it but the judge made the right decision.

Ummm...so...if you neglectfully starve a child to death...while your training them to commit mass murder against other children...isn't that homicide...albeit slow...painful...homicide...?





YouSir

My bet ?
They suddenly expire from "natural causes" before trial.

a reply to: galaga

That's what the prosecutor alleged. Apparently they didn't have the evidence to back up those allegations.