TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

a reply to: tjack

That was my first thought when I saw the tweet, that it had to do with yesterday’s primary elections. We had our primary yesterday in Missouri so that was the first place my mind went.

a reply to: AgarthaSeed

Been doing it for a week.

Feels good man.

o7!

originally posted by: TomLawless
Muh Russia.

“I was honored to deliver a letter from President Trump to President Vladimir Putin’s administration,” Paul tweeted Wednesday. “The letter emphasized the importance of further engagement in various areas including countering terrorism, enhancing legislative dialogue and resuming cultural exchanges.”

dailycaller.com...

OK, now Rand Paul is just trolling the libs.

What if: Hillary's emails were all intentionally planted disinformation?

Meant to be found.

We can't rule it out.

If it was me, that's what I'd be sayin'; an elaborate ruse.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

DECODE via POTUS "5 for 5" tweet (see post this replies to):

I think POTUS tweet was a key unlocking another layer of information.

The decode below builds on this to re-interpret #1506 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub...:

#1506

Check timestamp.
:18 Stroll
:32 POTUS
5:5?
Q

Using POTUS key that ":" stands for "for", we can interpret:
":18"= "for 18"= 418
":32"= "for 32"= 432

Government code 418 = EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Government code 432 = CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE

Therefore the post can be interpreted as:

"Walk the EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL,
POTUS use CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE,
(when) WIKILEAKS is questioned
Q"

I'll leave it to y'all to decide if this is accurate or relevant!

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

You Figured it out. And since WL has been comp'd the intel is not recent

Perhaps 5 for 5 is a reference to the FISA 'D5' clause regarding redaction (mentioned yesterday here)...and that when FISA docs are redacted, 5 individuals will go down.

Just a thought.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: toysforadults

Q posts containing "5:5" from qntmpkts.keybase.pub...:

(Line quotes rather than whole posts!):

#803 Feb 21st "[SIG_5:5_READ]"

#854 Mar 6th "Is the stage set for a drop of HRC +++ + +++++(raw vid 5:5)."

#963 Mar 23rd "Stage_5:5[y]"

#1028 Apr 5th "5:5 Q+" (Q+ = Q boss; assumed to be Mattis)

#1037 Apr 6th

BOOMs en route.
Blind.
5:5
GREEN_578cDT324-45785sd4DMP
Q

#1506 Jun 15

Check timestamp.
:18 Stroll
:32 POTUS
5:5?
Q

#1584 Jun 21st

We told you proofs were going to be important very soon.
New eyes.
Be ready.
5:5?
We thank you for your service.
Q

#1804 Aug 3rd

Autists present?
No connection?
Logical thinking.
Re: VIP access.
Subject: Threat to POTUS thwarted?
Rally: USSS threat IDEN > action taken.
Comms dark.
Message sent.
5:5?
Q

Rel, if we look at this now. It could mean 5:5, in the small font and solo, is the Q "confirmation proofs" are coming as telegraphed. Now a friend did say JA is in custody a few weeks ago, and as pointed out the 3/3/3 ad campaigning is a thing. We see JA in officially, per Warner request. Interesting to say the least.... And as thought, the 5:5 comes on the 8.....

We are receiving confirmation from the POTUS.

Keep trying guys and gals.

But you'll have to try harder than this.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

DECODE via POTUS "5 for 5" tweet (see post this replies to):

I think POTUS tweet was a key unlocking another layer of information.

The decode below builds on this to re-interpret #1506 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub...:

#1506

Check timestamp.
:18 Stroll
:32 POTUS
5:5?
Q

Using POTUS key that ":" stands for "for", we can interpret:
":18"= "for 18"= 418
":32"= "for 32"= 432

Government code 418 = EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Government code 432 = CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE

Therefore the post can be interpreted as:

"Walk the EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL,
POTUS use CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE,
(when) WIKILEAKS is questioned
Q"

I'll leave it to y'all to decide if this is accurate or relevant!

FTW.

a reply to: tjack

Honestly that is more likely, but we all know messages can have multiple meanings.

Like Q says, how many coincidences have to happen before it becomes a mathematical impossibility?

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: crankyoldman

...they've been demanding Q folks stop awakening so that the pedavorian hobbyist's can keep on keeping on? Yikes.

I'm old enough to be cranky, too. My job makes me even crankier. I have 'Protected B' security clearance, which means I get to read the files belonging to Federal criminals including pedophiles. Yikes is right. People would be shocked if they knew what I know. Sad part about it is, I have to watch as these animals are released back into the community.

CM,

Late reply. This is so important, I mean huge. You have PERSONAL experience here on the topic. To date, many in the Q world had no real contact with people who could put the pieces together in a real way: here we had actual accounts but damn hotheads. The "ah, that don't happen" whack jobs exist in delusion because they have no one to point out the truth in the layers. Your connection, contribution, ESPECIALLY in this territory is not only welcome, but beyond important. Thank you.

qntmpkts.keybase.pub... is up

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

DECODE via POTUS "5 for 5" tweet (see post this replies to):

I think POTUS tweet was a key unlocking another layer of information.

The decode below builds on this to re-interpret #1506 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub...:

#1506

Check timestamp.
:18 Stroll
:32 POTUS
5:5?
Q

Using POTUS key that ":" stands for "for", we can interpret:
":18"= "for 18"= 418
":32"= "for 32"= 432

Government code 418 = EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Government code 432 = CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE

Therefore the post can be interpreted as:

"Walk the EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL,
POTUS use CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE,
(when) WIKILEAKS is questioned
Q"

I'll leave it to y'all to decide if this is accurate or relevant!

Drop 576
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
21 Jan 2018 - 9:05:55 PM
Not from WL.
[CLAS-N-DI_9] gg_dump [No Such Agency].
It does not technically exist as open-source.
Q

Mentions WL but says "not from" could be direct from JA or Snowden=NSA

32x18 = 576

note the time stamp for drop 9:05:55

originally posted by: Sabrechucker

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

DECODE via POTUS "5 for 5" tweet (see post this replies to):

I think POTUS tweet was a key unlocking another layer of information.

The decode below builds on this to re-interpret #1506 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub...:

#1506

Check timestamp.
:18 Stroll
:32 POTUS
5:5?
Q

Using POTUS key that ":" stands for "for", we can interpret:
":18"= "for 18"= 418
":32"= "for 32"= 432

Government code 418 = EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
Government code 432 = CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE

Therefore the post can be interpreted as:

"Walk the EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL,
POTUS use CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE,
(when) WIKILEAKS is questioned
Q"

I'll leave it to y'all to decide if this is accurate or relevant!

Drop 576
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
21 Jan 2018 - 9:05:55 PM
Not from WL.
[CLAS-N-DI_9] gg_dump [No Such Agency].
It does not technically exist as open-source.
Q

Mentions WL but says "not from" could be direct from JA or Snowden=NSA

32x18 = 576

note the time stamp for drop 9:05:55

9:05:55

Sab, now your just piling on.

a reply to: crankyoldman

sorry, have fun folks

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Building on your analysis:

Drop 576

5+7+6 also = 18.

Unsure of the relevance of above or of the 32x18=576 though.

twitter.com...

From last night.

Another clue.

No way his Mum stopped fighting unless the fight was done.

originally posted by: xtradimensions
a reply to: tjack

That was my first thought when I saw the tweet, that it had to do with yesterday’s primary elections. We had our primary yesterday in Missouri so that was the first place my mind went.

The five candidates he endorsed won their primaries.

Very interesting tweet. If this is true then 5 for 5 indeed!