Senate Says, "Hell yes, Putin wanted Trump for President

a reply to: Phage

Are you talking about CAATSA? That was passed July 25 and signed August 2.

TheRedneck

a reply to: seagull

Other than sour grapes, and sore losing, how is this, in any shape or form, different?

So, carry on. Because we like what you did. Don't mind them, they're just mad they lost.

If you don't know how it's different, you haven't been paying attention. The world is changing, fast.

a reply to: TheRedneck

Yeah. That's the one. And the Russian sanctions weren't imposed until...March?

All those dastardly tweets outsmarted the American people, but only those who voted for Trump. Complete malarkey.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Yeah.
No, that is not the point. But keep toeing that line.
And Russia, keep it up.

a reply to: Phage

I would rather give Syria to Satan than continue to be a part of the nation largely responsible for the death of 400,000 Syrians and millions of displaced all across the middle east.

The last 40 years will go down in history as one of the worst periods of genocide the world has ever known. And it wasn't the Russians.

It was neoconservatives and the project for the New American Century that were responsible. Something both Bill and Hillary played a large roll in.

Something Trump had nothing to do with. I thank God for Trump, litteraly. History will land on my side of this debate.

I think you are spreading fear in the wrong direction. The tyranny and genocide are much closer to home.

But wait it's the Russians. Right?

a reply to: Isurrender73

No. Not just the Russians.

originally posted by: Phage
Why is there no thread on this? The Senate Intelligence committee, in a bipartisan report, has directly contradicted the Republican branch of the House Intelligence Committee.

The Committee believes the conclusions of the ICA are sound, and notes that collection and analysis subsequent to the ICA's publication continue to reinforce its assessments. The Committee will remain vigilant in its oversight of the ongoing challenges presented by foreign nations attempting to secretly influence U.S. affairs.

www.burr.senate.gov...

Meanwhile, in preparation for his meeting with Putin, Trump chews out NATO and the government does nothing to combat Russia's ongoing efforts to meddle. Why would the administration do anything? The Russians like "Republicans" like Trump. Do more of the same, please. We like the results.

At this point what difference does it make?

a reply to: shooterbrody

Do more of the same, please. We like the results.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Isurrender73

No. Not just the Russians.

Yeah Russia defeated ISIS, we funded them. Those evil meddling Russians. We could have killed another 400,000 and implemented our own regime if they would have just refused to help their ally.

Still can't figure out why Putin wanted Trump over Hillary?

a reply to: Phage

Yeah. That's the one. And the Russian sanctions weren't imposed until...March?

Really?

On September 29, 2017 and October 12, 2017, the President delegated authority to the Departments of State and the Treasury and the Director of National Intelligence to implement certain provisions in Titles I, II and III of CAATSA.

Did we find another time warp?

TheRedneck

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Yeah.
No, that is not the point. But keep toeing that line.
And Russia, keep it up.

When do you think Russia started trying to influence the US using propaganda? I suspect if you answer that question you will realise why it's not even the slightest bit interesting that Putin wanted Trump to win even if true., or that he was or could have been trying to help him.

If you or any other Trump hater has some evidence Trump was coordinating with Putin in his efforts behind the scenes then cough it up.

Until then... wail away.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: LesMisanthrope
Yeah.
No, that is not the point. But keep toeing that line.
And Russia, keep it up.

That is the point. Keep denying it.

a reply to: TheRedneck

Cool. Trump is the Great Delegator?
Title I is about Iran (iran_delegation_memo.pdf). Russia does not seem to be involved.
Titles II and III. I don't see Russian sanctions, or anything having to do with election meddling.



When did the administration apply the Russian sanctions. March?

originally posted by: Phage
Why is there no thread on this? The Senate Intelligence committee, in a bipartisan report, has directly contradicted the Republican branch of the House Intelligence Committee.

The Committee believes the conclusions of the ICA are sound, and notes that collection and analysis subsequent to the ICA's publication continue to reinforce its assessments. The Committee will remain vigilant in its oversight of the ongoing challenges presented by foreign nations attempting to secretly influence U.S. affairs.

www.burr.senate.gov...

Meanwhile, in preparation for his meeting with Putin, Trump chews out NATO and the government does nothing to combat Russia's ongoing efforts to meddle. Why would the administration do anything? The Russians like "Republicans" like Trump. Do more of the same, please. We like the results.

The Senate said, "Hell Yes"?

No they didn't. Connotation is a thing and you abused it.

a reply to: MemoryShock

ATS has a proud tradition of misleading titles.
Don't you know.

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Phage

Yeah. That's the one. And the Russian sanctions weren't imposed until...March?

Really?

On September 29, 2017 and October 12, 2017, the President delegated authority to the Departments of State and the Treasury and the Director of National Intelligence to implement certain provisions in Titles I, II and III of CAATSA.

Did we find another time warp?

TheRedneck

Did you really use fiction as the support for your argument?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MemoryShock

ATS has a proud tradition of misleading titles.
Don't you know.

Eh. That's not a direct answer.

a reply to: MemoryShock

No.

It is.