It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Kharron
Where does the Constitution give them the power to conscript us?
Necessities in a time of war don't count, although in Nam it wasnt a necessity, but this logic of hey in this imperialist state lets give the state endless mobs of millions of cannon fodder to go subjugate the planet even further with, yeah good luck with that, like communism I will resist.
originally posted by: Resilient1
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Just to piggyback on your post, here's where ICE is cited as constitutional too.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
originally posted by: Kharron
Necessities in a time of war don't count, although in Nam it wasnt a necessity, but this logic of hey in this imperialist state lets give the state endless mobs of millions of cannon fodder to go subjugate the planet even further with, yeah good luck with that, like communism I will resist.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Kharron
originally posted by: Kharron
Necessities in a time of war don't count, although in Nam it wasnt a necessity, but this logic of hey in this imperialist state lets give the state endless mobs of millions of cannon fodder to go subjugate the planet even further with, yeah good luck with that, like communism I will resist.
originally posted by: Resilient1
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
Is America a Capitalist Democratic Republic? Are there any countries that already have Socialism in place? If you like that model why not move to one of these countries instead of trying to overthrow the government?
originally posted by: toysforadults
socialism is giving your personal power over to government so they can choose what's best for you
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
It is having THE PUBLIC in charge of the government, so the public can choose what is best for themselves.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
It is having THE PUBLIC in charge of the government, so the public can choose what is best for themselves.
Please do elaborate how that actually works...
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
It is having THE PUBLIC in charge of the government, so the public can choose what is best for themselves.
Please do elaborate how that actually works...
originally posted by: neo96
Socialism is just one natural extension of basic human nature.
Socialism is the antithesis of human nature.
Human nature is pure darwinism.
Strong survive the weak gets eaten.
Unless your a socialist then you'll just outsource your existence to the state by majority 'rule'.
AKA called SOCIAL ENGINEERING.
Instead of EVOLVING.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
originally posted by: Isurrender73
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
Can you give me an example where facism or forced communism wasn't masked by calling it socialism? Any example regardless of death count.
Elitism leads to the usurpation of Socialism to the benifit of the few over the many. Which is no longer socialism.
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
That is why democracy is a lie, and we live in an oligarchy. Rule by the rich.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: Isurrender73
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
originally posted by: MrVancityeagle
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: MrVancityeagle
I dont know why it has become such a negative thing.
Probably because it has led to the deaths of millions.
It takes power and influence from the 99% as well. Some little farmer can’t eat from his own crops because it is owned by the “collective”.
this is the stock right wing response which is complete bull.
How many deaths has capitalism lead to ?
Got an answer ? It is far more than whatever you believe can be attritbuted to Socialism, if you want to play this game.
Stock, socialist piffle.
I’ll play that game. Collectivized farming under Stalin, for example. The cultural revolution under Mao, for example.
Can you give me an example where facism or forced communism wasn't masked by calling it socialism? Any example regardless of death count.
Elitism leads to the usurpation of Socialism to the benifit of the few over the many. Which is no longer socialism.
North Korea, probably. It’s a socialist, racist, junta.