SALLY MOYER Outed as the FBI Agent Who Labeled Trump Supporters as Retarded.

a reply to: dawnstar

We won't know because they weren't on that investigation.

This isn't an expose into who has what opinions in the FBI. This is about how certain investigations were handled, and in this case, if the handling of the investigations appeared to be skewed, then the personal opinions of the agents involved are relevant.

a reply to: ketsuko


and yet the OIG report states rather clearly that they saw no evidence that the negative opinions of trump expressed in these emails affected the investigation and it's results...
and yet, the personal correspondence alone is supposed to prove something??
like I said, let's see what the other side of the fence was saying!!!

oh, by the way....

Ha! People are entitled to their opinions ... unless they happen to be people whose opinions you don't like and then those people should lose their jobs and never show their faces in public again, amirite?

These heroic FBI agents though ... they're just calling it like they see it; just like David Duke I'm sure.

this is so ironic considering that it's coming from someone who seems to want to degrade and entire intelligence community because of the opinions of a few within it just so they can undermine the legitimacy of an ongoing investigation into the actions of their hero president!!!

I wonder what "The Filter Team" filtered out.

Can only imaging how biased it was.

💥The💥Sun💥Burn💥

a reply to: carewemust

We have the texts where they say Obama wanted to know everything. But like the Hillary server he emailed, he will claim ignorance. Maybe he will go with the Comey defense, I knew, but I am not sure I knew that I knew.

DP

a reply to: dawnstar

...based on the info obtained by the IG.

Lots of withheld stuff coming sooner rather than later.

🎃✅

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xtrozero

In fact IQ does determine if you're stupid.
It measures intelligence quotient.
Knowledge is influential. IQ determines how much knowledge you can absorb.

So lets say you memorized a 1000 books, are you saying you can not still be stupid in life? IQ measures a very limited area, one slice of the whole pie, so to speak.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Even a parrot can repeat a phrase but if you ask the parrot what it means he will tell you he wants a cracker .

a reply to: DBCowboy

Who's defending who? I'm just pointing out how she wasn't PC enough.

originally posted by: the2ofusr1

Even a parrot can repeat a phrase but if you ask the parrot what it means he will tell you he wants a cracker .

In all fairness, IQ does provide a reasonable amount of measurement of what a person can understand within a frame of time, but once again someone who finds Calculus IV or Linear Algebra easy could just as easily be the person you tell not to put their hand in a blender.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1


Who's defending who? I'm just pointing out how she wasn't PC enough.

No one is PC enough anymore. PC is the new thought police that is ready to crush anyone that gets in their way.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Xtrozero

I thought we agreed IQ is really a measure of not much at all.

Or am I a victim of the Mandela effect?

I agree with this.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Xtrozero

I thought we agreed IQ is really a measure of not much at all.

Or am I a victim of the Mandela effect?

To you maybe...
Take a look at IQ levels compared national prosperity and you might change your tune.

a reply to: dawnstar

That is not entirely accurate.

For example:

Conversely, we found that the FBI’s explanations for its failure to take immediate action after discovering the Weiner laptop in October 2016 to be unpersuasive, and we did not have confidence that the decision of Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Weiner laptop was free from bias.

Nonetheless, these messages cast a cloud over the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation and the investigation’s credibility.

We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations

He also says that they did not review every investigative decision due to time constraints.

oig.justice.gov...

a reply to: dawnstar

No.

They saw no evidence that the bias of the investigators influenced *that* investigation, meaning the one into Hillary's emails. It's worth noting there are other investigations still being looked into, and the IG felt the need to point out no bias for *that* particular one, not as in *all* of them which could indicate there is evidence of bias in other places (Trump-Russia investigation report, for example).

And for no evidence of bias, Peter Strzok sure did get escorted off FBI HQ grounds. That doesn't seem to match with your assertions. Clearly, something is wrong there.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Xtrozero

I thought we agreed IQ is really a measure of not much at all.

Or am I a victim of the Mandela effect?

I'm fairly certain it used to be called the Mandella effect. When did that change?