It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Whoisjohngalt
Do pandemics still pose an existential threat to the first world in 2018?
For the purposes of the R&D Blueprint, WHO has developed a special tool for determining which diseases and pathogens to prioritize for research and development in public health emergency contexts. This tool seeks to identify those diseases that pose a public health risk because of their epidemic potential and for which there are no, or insufficient, countermeasures. The diseases identified through this process are the focus of the work of R& D Blueprint. This is not an exhaustive list, nor does it indicate the most likely causes of the next epidemic.
Report of the meeting pdf, 460kb
The second annual review occurred 6-7 February, 2018. Experts consider that given their potential to cause a public health emergency and the absence of efficacious drugs and/or vaccines, there is an urgent need for accelerated research and development for*:
- Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF)
- Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus disease
- Lassa fever
- Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
- Nipah and henipaviral diseases
- Rift Valley fever (RVF)
- Zika
- Disease X
Disease X represents the knowledge that a serious international epidemic could be caused by a pathogen currently unknown to cause human disease, and so the R&D Blueprint explicitly seeks to enable cross-cutting R&D preparedness that is also relevant for an unknown “Disease X” as far as possible
Crazy is building your ark after the flood has already come.
originally posted by: vinifalou
originally posted by: Whoisjohngalt
Do pandemics still pose an existential threat to the first world in 2018?
Well, absolutely!
Especially when you have government organizations working to either spread diseases or to hide and/or destroy the cure.
Going on-topic...
This sounds concerning. I did a little digging because I remember something we discussed in ATS a few months ago about possible future epidemics, and I found this:
WHO - List of Blueprint priority diseases
For the purposes of the R&D Blueprint, WHO has developed a special tool for determining which diseases and pathogens to prioritize for research and development in public health emergency contexts. This tool seeks to identify those diseases that pose a public health risk because of their epidemic potential and for which there are no, or insufficient, countermeasures. The diseases identified through this process are the focus of the work of R& D Blueprint. This is not an exhaustive list, nor does it indicate the most likely causes of the next epidemic.
Now it gets interesting:
February 2018 - Second annual review
Report of the meeting pdf, 460kb
The second annual review occurred 6-7 February, 2018. Experts consider that given their potential to cause a public health emergency and the absence of efficacious drugs and/or vaccines, there is an urgent need for accelerated research and development for*:
- Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF)
- Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus disease
- Lassa fever
- Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
- Nipah and henipaviral diseases
- Rift Valley fever (RVF)
- Zika
- Disease X
Now enlighten me on this:
Disease X represents the knowledge that a serious international epidemic could be caused by a pathogen currently unknown to cause human disease, and so the R&D Blueprint explicitly seeks to enable cross-cutting R&D preparedness that is also relevant for an unknown “Disease X” as far as possible
How did they knew about it? Were there any reports before this one?
I don't know, I just don't trust WHO. Maybe I'm seeing things where there isn't.
Maybe there is and it's right in front of us we can't even see.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Whoisjohngalt
It seems like we're too far removed from even the epidemics of the 20th century and people have been lulled into thinking that taking # like this seriously is an overreaction to fear porn.
The Spanish Flu epidemic of 1918 infected about a third of everyone and wiped out 3-5% of the world's population, including something like 700k Americans at a time when the population was about 100 million. Scale that up to now and it would be like having 2.2 million people die. That's more people than die from heart disease, cancer, stroke, respiratory disease, diabetes (and some other causes) per year. It would be something like an 80% mortality increase in one year.
Does anyone *really* believe that there won't be worse viruses? And consider the differences in travel a century ago to today and what that implies for transmission.
originally posted by: Whoisjohngalt
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Whoisjohngalt
It seems like we're too far removed from even the epidemics of the 20th century and people have been lulled into thinking that taking # like this seriously is an overreaction to fear porn.
The Spanish Flu epidemic of 1918 infected about a third of everyone and wiped out 3-5% of the world's population, including something like 700k Americans at a time when the population was about 100 million. Scale that up to now and it would be like having 2.2 million people die. That's more people than die from heart disease, cancer, stroke, respiratory disease, diabetes (and some other causes) per year. It would be something like an 80% mortality increase in one year.
Does anyone *really* believe that there won't be worse viruses? And consider the differences in travel a century ago to today and what that implies for transmission.
I think that in more developed countries, the fight against natural pathogens is pretty one sided, given the current level of technology. During the spanish flu, there were no anti-viral drugs. Penicillin wasnt even a thing until 20 years after. I dont think we will see anything natural happening like the spanish flu in western civilization.
But, there is always the chance that the perfect strain could evolve.
originally posted by: khnum
a reply to: Whoisjohngalt
Nope practice run- when 5g cranks up at 60ghz which is the frequency that affects oxygen and in turn breathing you'll get the big one then.