More Tommy Robinson riots

a reply to: Fools

More video from Trafalgar Square. I don't think the police were ready for such a presence, literally thousands of people marching. Rule, Britannia!

twitter.com/lewishorne14/status/1005526504661573633

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: Fools

More video from Trafalgar Square. I don't think the police were ready for such a presence, literally thousands of people marching. Rule, Britannia!

twitter.com/lewishorne14/status/1005526504661573633

You need a new definition of the word 'literally'. I see maybe a hundred or so drunken idiots who all run away in the end.
Meh.

a reply to: UKTruth

Thats impressive. There saying upwards of 20000 people there

a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I think you need to learn to count, cause I see a lot more than a "hundred" people in just the first few frames of the video. Imagine what the panorama is like.

You might note how quick Tommy Robinson was jailed and sentenced because it was politically correct do so. Meanwhile, the state actively avoided pursuing and prosecuting Muslim child rape gangs because it was poltically incorrect to do so. Strange world.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Yet you would defend a pedo's right to talk to children online.
Yup strange world indeed.

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Yet you would defend a pedo's right to talk to children online.
Yup strange world indeed.

I’m not the one thinking about And speaking about pedos and children all the time, but I do defend free speech, yes.

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I think you need to learn to count, cause I see a lot more than a "hundred" people in just the first few frames of the video. Imagine what the panorama is like.

And how many are involved as opposed to those who are just watching? You don't get a good idea of the numbers, but no, there's less than 200 there, some waving pints.
Oh and they all run away at the end.

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

As someone who was abused as a kid I want them to pay I want them unable to groom kids online, I will not blame their inability to spot evil on the victims like yourself.
Tommy Robinson had a good message but did it all wrong and illegal he could have caused a mis trial and the victims would have had to go through the process of going to court again.

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

As someone who was abused as a kid I want them to pay I want them unable to groom kids online, I will not blame their inability to spot evil on the victims like yourself.

Tommy Robinson had a good message but did it all wrong and illegal he could have caused a mis trial and the victims would have had to go through the process of going to court again.

I don’t believe in censorship. I cannot in good conscience advocate for trampling on someone else’s human rights.

They keep saying he could cause a mistrial, but in places where no such laws exist, the US for instance, that simply doesn’t happen. In other words it’s a lie.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I think you need to learn to count, cause I see a lot more than a "hundred" people in just the first few frames of the video. Imagine what the panorama is like.

And how many are involved as opposed to those who are just watching? You don't get a good idea of the numbers, but no, there's less than 200 there, some waving pints.
Oh and they all run away at the end.

Lol, 200? I can see you are good at denying reality - much like you deny the problem of radical Islamic. But then you did say you 'speak as a journalist', so we already know you are a liar.

a reply to: theantediluvian

Everyone always thinks they're in the right. Imo your own comments belie a cognitive dissonance that suggests a lack of objective reasoning:

Considering that you're one of the better known bias spin-doctors on this sight I would say that this applies to you with really every post you've ever written.

So in effect, you believe that Robinson's imprisonment is a tyrannical response to him expressing "conservative" views — he's being retaliated against for his opinions — and at the same you also imply that anyone who doesn't agree with your opinions could face retaliation for theirs.

If you believe that, then you stating basically that fighting against tyranny is tyrannical and therefore tyranny should be left to rein unhindered in order to prevent tyranny.... No. The bit about this applying to "conservative" views only: your words, not his, --i.e., more spin.

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

As someone who was abused as a kid I want them to pay I want them unable to groom kids online, I will not blame their inability to spot evil on the victims like yourself.

Tommy Robinson had a good message but did it all wrong and illegal he could have caused a mis trial and the victims would have had to go through the process of going to court again.

I don’t believe in censorship. I cannot in good conscience advocate for trampling on someone else’s human rights.

They keep saying he could cause a mistrial, but in places where no such laws exist, the US for instance, that simply doesn’t happen. In other words it’s a lie.

Do you believe in the rule of law?

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: theantediluvian

there's no logical way to defend this guy being thrown in jail for exposing organized gang rape

as someone who tends to lean left I would expect you to side with him on this issue, are you for organized gang rape because it's their culture???

Um... The people he was trying to expose were already on trial. He wasnt exposing anything.

To all the sell out, disgraceful grooming gang apologists who cry racist, on behalf of the ones who are trying to fight back.

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: Kandinsky

Ah #, you've bored me to death already with the same points that have already been made in three other threads and 100s of pages. if it's gonna be the same arguments why not go post this in one of the other active threads?? 

I'm bailing out and fast. Enjoy the repetition. 

You just said you repeat talking points you have previously made.

Maybe you are just closed to the possibility so that even people and issues like those associated with TR can NOT be valid, ever.

I think that if such tyranny and abuse were in power as these protesters say, that their protests would demand more than ask for change.

Thats their argument as well: It IS that bad.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I think you need to learn to count, cause I see a lot more than a "hundred" people in just the first few frames of the video. Imagine what the panorama is like.

And how many are involved as opposed to those who are just watching? You don't get a good idea of the numbers, but no, there's less than 200 there, some waving pints.
Oh and they all run away at the end.

Lol, 200? I can see you are good at denying reality - much like you deny the problem of radical Islamic. But then you did say you 'speak as a journalist', so we already know you are a liar.

Ah, I thought you'd play this card. I can spell, count and think without mindless hate. No, I'm not a liar. Given your comments so far about so many issues where we have clashed I know you are though.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I think you need to learn to count, cause I see a lot more than a "hundred" people in just the first few frames of the video. Imagine what the panorama is like.

And how many are involved as opposed to those who are just watching? You don't get a good idea of the numbers, but no, there's less than 200 there, some waving pints.
Oh and they all run away at the end.

Lol, 200? I can see you are good at denying reality - much like you deny the problem of radical Islamic. But then you did say you 'speak as a journalist', so we already know you are a liar.

Ah, I thought you'd play this card. I can spell, count and think without mindless hate. No, I'm not a liar. Given your comments so far about so many issues where we have clashed I know you are though.

Given our clashes in the past and your associated comments I'd have to question your assertion that you can think at all, let alone without mindless hate. You are after all a journalist. Not paid to think.

Anyway, none of that changes the fact that you lied about the number of protesters, or are unable to count or see what is in front of your eyes (again, a common issue for journalists).

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I think you need to learn to count, cause I see a lot more than a "hundred" people in just the first few frames of the video. Imagine what the panorama is like.

And how many are involved as opposed to those who are just watching? You don't get a good idea of the numbers, but no, there's less than 200 there, some waving pints.
Oh and they all run away at the end.

Lol, 200? I can see you are good at denying reality - much like you deny the problem of radical Islamic. But then you did say you 'speak as a journalist', so we already know you are a liar.

Ah, I thought you'd play this card. I can spell, count and think without mindless hate. No, I'm not a liar. Given your comments so far about so many issues where we have clashed I know you are though.

Given our clashes in the past and your associated comments I'd have to question your assertion that you can think at all, let alone without mindless hate. You are after all a journalist. Not paid to think.

You are, as ever, 100% wrong. But that was what I expected. Shall we return to sniping about the idiots who ran away yesterday? Some army!

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: AngryCymraeg

I think you need to learn to count, cause I see a lot more than a "hundred" people in just the first few frames of the video. Imagine what the panorama is like.

And how many are involved as opposed to those who are just watching? You don't get a good idea of the numbers, but no, there's less than 200 there, some waving pints.
Oh and they all run away at the end.

Lol, 200? I can see you are good at denying reality - much like you deny the problem of radical Islamic. But then you did say you 'speak as a journalist', so we already know you are a liar.

Ah, I thought you'd play this card. I can spell, count and think without mindless hate. No, I'm not a liar. Given your comments so far about so many issues where we have clashed I know you are though.

Given our clashes in the past and your associated comments I'd have to question your assertion that you can think at all, let alone without mindless hate. You are after all a journalist. Not paid to think.

You are, as ever, 100% wrong. But that was what I expected. Shall we return to sniping about the idiots who ran away yesterday? Some army!

So you are holding to your '200 people' argument then?
Or do you know you were talking BS, but just can't admit it?