Debunking Creation of Portals by CERN

Howdy all.

This subject notion is being continuously promoted by all manner of Kooks, Cranks, Nutcases, woo video makers, Pastors etc.
Although this notion is simply debunked by the absence of proof of any created portals where something has come thru or gone to another dimension at the CERN.
How can smashing negligible mass particles create any portals, I would like to ask people like david icke, kerry cassidy, joseph farrell.
Furthermore there is no evidence of CERN having created a tiny black hole and its subsequent evaporation.

a reply to: Hyperboles

Evidence for either yes or no is non existent isn't it? How would we know if they did or didn't do such things?

a reply to: Hyperboles

When people start referencing portals, it's time to put the Hazmat suits on and stand by for eye-level manure. As sure as the sun rises in the morning, the mention of 'portals' is a clear sign someone is shoe-shining. Half the time they're kidding themselves and the rest is trickery on us.

The best thing about portals is how awesome they are in books and TV stories. A writer can include portals and suddenly the characters can time-travel, cross the universe or follow different time-lines. Bad guys can appear from nowhere like the monster in the closet or aliens through the stargate. That's how we know they're BS too. They're devices and McGuffins to drive narratives and are either 'supernatural' or described in technobabble.

I guess when Debunking is starting to insult and then stating there is no evidence.. CERN having created portals is debunked.

Sure , the equivalent energy released of 16 mosquitoes in flight will open portals .
Do not be around a swarm of em...
Absolutely NOTHING can exist in a dimension
Takes at least the first 4 to define mass.

a reply to: Gothmog

Sure , the equivalent energy released of 16 mosquitoes in flight will open portals . Do not be around a swarm of em...

it's how you look at it , I think their energy bill is somewhat higher.. where does the rest of the energy go... hella yeah , warmth. So in fact CERN is dangerous because it contributes to global warming

a reply to: Hyperboles

I work in the particle smashing business(albeit smaller scale and for semiconductors), and no portals opened yet in socal. I don't think people who claim portals can explain what a portal is exactly...

This debunks itself, let the tinfoils massage their egotistical fantasy lobe, stay away from them.

I didn't know this needed to be debunked.
Why is this is aliens forum?

Is the premise that they are creating wormholes enabling deep space travel?

Is that the portal?

Why not theories involving antimatter since that's at least in the realm of what they are studying .well..matter and it's creation anyway. Dan Brown wrote a compelling story that even brought in the value of prayer and the law of attraction. There's a few good threads right there.

originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: Gothmog

Sure , the equivalent energy released of 16 mosquitoes in flight will open portals . Do not be around a swarm of em...

it's how you look at it , I think their energy bill is somewhat higher.. where does the rest of the energy go... hella yeah , warmth. So in fact CERN is dangerous because it contributes to global warming

The experiments consume maybe 10-15% of the energy. And while the collision energy is very small, they have like 600 million collision events per second.

Most energy is used is used to keep the whole thing running: kryogenics, vacuum pumps, cooling, ventilation etc.

originally posted by: Hyperboles

Although this notion is simply debunked by the absence of proof

Stopped reading there

a reply to: moebius

Most energy is used is used to keep the whole thing running: kryogenics, vacuum pumps, cooling, ventilation etc.

So warmth , Cern is basically hot air funded by the EU.

Well hat's a joke I r3eally admire CERN and what the heck they are doing. But I'm not that naive to think that the public has insight to all their experiments. Portals ? Well no , I hope. But debunking is something else than just stating there is no evidence so move on...

Maybe there is an alternative way to use that machine that the public doesn't know about who knows. Sarcastic , not all scientists are into brownie points

If all the research comes down to validate an highly abstract theory and finding particles that have no benefit for humanity in the near future. Then why isn't it better to focus on technology that may benefit humanity a few decades down the road. Like uh for instance go to mars ?

originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: Gothmog

Sure , the equivalent energy released of 16 mosquitoes in flight will open portals . Do not be around a swarm of em...

it's how you look at it , I think their energy bill is somewhat higher.. where does the rest of the energy go... hella yeah , warmth. So in fact CERN is dangerous because it contributes to global warming

It goes to powering all those supermagnets that enable the LHC to accelerate particles and keep them circling until they reach the desired speed for collision.

To do anything more , it would have to be fed almost infinite energy. And we dont have infinite energy
Get a physics book
Done
Next

a reply to: Kandinsky

Just because you consider portals to be narrative fantasy doesn't disclose them from actual reality.

The Scifi TV shows aren't just guessing that wormholes bend space, or that particle reconstruction would have a similar effect to teleportation. It's fiction, that is based on science, normally.

Stories of Time Machines and Portals themselves were very connected to the Scientific conclusions in their day of origins that they are possible phenomenons. It's only even interesting, BECAUSE it's possible.

I agree but the problem is you presented no evidence to prove your op. And in science you have to be specific as well for example would proving there is an unseen dimension be considered a portal? This extra dimension could be separated from ours by a million trillion trillionth of a centimeter. Is this a parallel yet inaccessible universe? And then there is a possibility of something called dark axion portals.

phys.org...

a reply to: Gothmog

Well it was a rhetorical question no need to get patronizing. As I stated the rendement is rather low. Cern creates a lot of Entropy does it ?

a reply to: FlatMyAss

Just because you consider portals to be narrative fantasy doesn't disclose them from actual reality.

right... I beg to differ if there are really portals at Cern. But well if one starts to debunk that , look I do know that Cern tried to research the existence of Parallel universes. (P-Brane theory). Outcome was negative wasn't it. Well thats what the public is told.

Hypothetical : What if Cern found something that could comprimize national security. Would they tell the public ? I don't think so. I find it kind of suspicious that all discoveries lead to save outcomes... What practical use has their research ? Almost zero because most of it is theoretical. Still CERN is funded beyond imagination. Maybe people not seen by the public benefit a lot.... Could be.

originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: Gothmog

Well it was a rhetorical question no need to get patronizing. As I stated the rendement is rather low. Cern creates a lot of Entropy does it ?

Rendement ? Yield
Well , I guess folks create more passing gas...
CERN creates nothing. They were the creators of the LHC.
The LHC is what does the work.

Entropy - imagine 2 molecules combining.

And , by the way , particle accelerators have been around since the "Roarin 20s"
Colliders since the 60s (?) or sooner

Nothing different except the speed of the particles.

And I meant no disrespect , but the ignorance surrounding particle collisions is amazing
It is a natural occurrence.

a reply to: Gothmog

Well , ok. Let's assume your Iq is 153 and mine 89... Is your attitude the best one to defy ignorance. Look i've read several books on the topic. Still it's kinda condocending... If I was a 'portal' believer (which i'm not). That attitude wouldn't open a discussion.

The only thing I'm trying to say here is that the official narrative of CERN might only part of what is happening at CERN.

originally posted by: frenchfries
a reply to: Gothmog

Well , ok. Let's assume your Iq is 153 and mine 89... Is your attitude the best one to defy ignorance. Look i've read several books on the topic. Still it's kinda condocending... If I was a 'portal' believer (which i'm not). That attitude wouldn't open a discussion.

The only thing I'm trying to say here is that the official narrative of CERN might only part of what is happening at CERN.

You mean CERN @ LHC....
Again , CERN just monitors the outcome of the LHC
CERN is scientists
LHC - Large Hadron Collider.
And , no , IQ means nothing. Learning about a subject does.
If I can , anyone can
Then , they debunk the title of this thread fairly dang quick . Themselves.

Creation of Portals by CERN

The giggle factor associated with 'portals' and 'wormholes' is the regularity of their being invoked ["looks like a.."] for spectacular missile/rocket events. Search youtube and rutube with those keywords and you get human rocket plumes at twilight. Or CGI.