-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART -V-

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Personally, I'm a bit taken aback by Q highlighting the NYT article in his most recent posts.
What would be Q's purpose in so doing?

Q now moving into the MSM narrative. Prepare.

Look at the big picture here. Q has MILLIONS of supporters now.

Long ago everyone here, pretty much, debated validity.

Do any of you latecomers think to ask this question...

Would the US government allow this to go on if they were not involved?

No way in hell.

Pgate was shut down by the people involved when they had more control of the narritive.

Those people have OBVIOUSLY lost their control to shut this down at this point.

The government is plainly letting this happen right now.

Not to mention all of the things Q has proven to know before the general public.

I am not going to list them all. If you are interested then you should read through the threads because it happened OVER and OVER many times.

Now the question of truth in all that is being "dropped" to the public is up for debate. Is Q pointing in the direction of truth or conspiracy?

That is left to us and the research. Some topics might be over the top.

Q has also told us that is part of this exercise. Disinformation. That part is up to everyone to figure put for themselves.

To clarify before some of you panic. The net is not going to be shutdown completely. This is in preparation when the pic/video drops. They will do everything in there power to keep it from getting shared and plastered all over the net. They will not succeed of course.

a reply to: introvert

Added in above:
Now I've checked your whole stream herein and nope you dont ask any specific question, bitch about 'it' being vague, but vaguely demand proof in a way that cannot be directly answered because you're not being specific about what you want to know.

Well somebody is posting the stuff so unless its a bot then "Q" 'exists'.

Unless you mean is "Q" really a 'insider'?

I keep telling them to put together an OP that lays out all the 'evidence' for that angle...

Me personally I think it'd be better if it isnt 'part of the Trump admin', but now I have seen "drops" posted herein where "Q" speaks directly as if part of the Trump admin or whatever.

Which does create a burden of proof situation.

I thought this was common knowledge...?

a reply to: isoTruth

That pretty much sums up who you are...at the expense of others.

You can tell what sort of person I am through one post?

Damn. You are special, aren't you.

Yes, I am having fun at the expense of others. For a long time I tried to be nice and use simple logic. That failed and continues to fail. So instead I am trying the asshole approach. It actually works a bit better.

It doesn't get people to start using critical thinking skills, but no one can accuse me of being dishonest and not saying what I think. Unlike many on this forum.

There are too many liars around here for my liking.

Seems to me, that the whole reason for Q and this thread is because there have been many people having fun at the expense of others. I call it EVIL.

The entire reason behind this thread and the topic in general is for people to create grand conspiracies about people they do not even know and accuse them of potentially doing horrific things that cannot be proven.

You call it evil, I call it pulling # out of your asses because their hatred for others forces them to concoct lies and perpetuate hoaxes.

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
Not to mention all of the things Q has proven to know before the general public.

Still waiting to see a big fancy OP that lays all that out too...

originally posted by: tiredoflooking

Q has also told us that is part of this exercise. Disinformation. That part is up to everyone to figure put for themselves.

Care to explain that better? Please.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I keep telling you we will do it depending on how things finish and they aren't there yet

a reply to: WhatTheory

Did we somehow get pictures of Barack from his time in Pakistan?

a reply to: introvert

Welcome to the wide world WEB.

Seems something you are taking very seriously. Answer this WHY?

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Q has said , repeatedly, that disinfo is necessary.

That's just my interpretation of it.

Q is cryptic and cloaked by design.

People demanding "proof" just make themselves out to be very unaware, or worse.

a reply to: introvert

Hi, I'm #ing retarded.

Who the hell are you?

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

originally posted by: carewemust
Recent Q post #1039 links to this article.

www.nytimes.com...

He says, "Would you believe the NYT called the White House prior to publishing"?

Are these points in the article accurate:

In the QAnon reality, Trump only pretended to collude with Russia in order to create a pretext for the hiring of Robert Mueller, the special counsel, who is actually working with Trump to take down an inconceivably evil and powerful network of coup-plotters and child sex traffickers that includes Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and George Soros.
...
One twist, however, makes QAnon unusual. Conspiracy theories are usually about evil cabals manipulating world events. QAnon, by contrast, is a conspiracy theory in which the good guys — in this case, Trump and his allies — are in charge. It’s a dream of power rather than a bitter alibi for victimhood. It seems designed to cope with the cognitive dissonance caused by the gap between Trump as his faithful followers like to imagine him, and Trump as he is.
...
Barr, for example, retweeted a QAnon post arguing that conservative criticism of the omnibus spending bill, legislation many on the right deplored, was shortsighted. In releasing funds to the military, it said, the bill would set off a climactic series of events: “Swamp drain begins, military seizes TRILLIONS in cabal assets, returning them to the people.” An inspector general report would then reveal the establishment’s unspeakable crimes, after which “the strings will be cut from the propaganda machine and people will stop falling for the garbage MSM,” or mainstream media. Trump, and those who believe in him, would be vindicated.

No, most of that is BS

Q has never said Mueller is on Trumps side.

It is ridiculous to say Trump supporters need Q to validate Trump is doing a good job.

It is quite the opposite, Trump has the economy booming, has destroyed ISIS, and is getting NK to denuclearize. He is doing a fabulous job. Anybody that thinks he is not is the one who needs emotional reassurance they are not wrong (They are). Which is exactly what the late night comedians, CNN, MSNBC, and all the other liberal rags provide them with. So this statement is total projection.

The left all focuses on Trumps style - not the substance of the job he is doing. I'm not crazy about his style a lot of the time either, but that is trivial, results are all that matter.

The stuff about the omnibus bill being exactly what Trump actually wanted was kind of hinted at by Q, and he did say military funding was critical for the operation. So that part is mostly true. The IG report should expose a heck of a lot of crimes in the DOJ, and that is a lot more than speculation - people that have seen part of it have leaked, and yes this will further show the CNN's of the world to be totally Fake News yet again.

a reply to: introvert
There are have been numerous instances where Trump authenticated Q and Q drops, both via twitter and verbally. It's in the threads. Q is definitely with Trump. If it's a hoax it's on Trump himself for perpetrating it via Q.

New drops

a reply to: proximo

It's like they scrolled through Q speculation and pulled out the stuff that most satisfied their deepest wish fulfillment.

q1046



www.thestoryofq.com...

q1047



www.thestoryofq.com...