UNESCO 2018 International technical guidance on sexuality education.

UNESCO has released their 2018 "guideline" on sexual education. These "guidelines" are part of the UN's "Global Education 2030 Agenda".

Here is the main link to that document.

unesdoc.unesco.org...

I first want to point out part of the claim being made in the "foreword" of this document.

...
Despite these advances, too many young people still make the transition from childhood to adulthood receiving inaccurate,
incomplete or judgement-laden information affecting their physical, social and emotional development. This inadequate
preparation not only exacerbates the vulnerability of children and youth to exploitation and other harmful outcomes, but it also
represents the failure of society’s duty bearers to fulfil their obligations to an entire generation.
...

To me it is quite ironic that they mention the "inadequate preparation and vulnerability" of children to "exploitation" when the main argument being presented in this document is to "enforce" (make mandatory) the sexual education of children starting from 5 years of age, and in using every school subject to impose this "indoctrination", which the document explains includes teaching children that “sexual pleasure” is more than okay before these children turn 10 years of age.

I know some people in these forums will be fine and dandy with having such imposed agenda, despite the fact that many parents would be against this type of "indoctrination". The mandatory "indoctrination" starts with teaching children of 5 years of age that masturbation is okay, but has to be private. It then goes on to say that at age 9 children should be able to explain "male and female responses to sexual stimulation", by age 12 the document states that children must “support the right of everyone to express their sexual feelings." Remember that after years of imposed indoctrination starting at 5 years of age, children will be told when they are still minors that "they must support the right of everyone to express their sexual feelings". The expression of sexual feelings include not only masturbation, but hedonism in all forms, including sodomy, and it paints traditional morality "as old-fashioned and wrong" .

Here is the thing, the document does not say that "pedophiles" should be excluded in the claim that "everyone has a right to express their sexual feelings." If you think that the document does not include "pedophiles" in their description that "everyone has a right to express their sexual feelings", perhaps you weren't aware that the UN voted Saudi Arabia on the UN Women’s Panel.

How was Saudi Arabia Voted onto a UN Women’s Panel?

If you don't trust the above Human Rights website, perhaps the following one should suffice.

Saudi Arabia elected to UN women's rights commission

People might have forgotten that Saudi Arabia not only suppresses women's rights. Saudi Arabia is still a country where adult men can marry underage children.

Heck, here is a newspaper which points out the views of Saudi Arabia Grand Mufti.

Published: 15:29 December 21, 2014
Gulf News
By Habib Toumi, Bureau Chief

Manama: Saudi Arabia’s efforts to edge closer to setting a minimum age for marriage have received a blow after the Grand Mufti said there was nothing wrong with girls below 15 getting married.

“There is currently no intention to discuss the issue,” Shaikh Abdul Aziz Al Shaikh said, quoted by local daily Al Riyadh on Sunday.

In a bold attempt to force changes on the grounds, the justice ministry has been pushing for setting up the minimum age.
...

gulfnews.com...

So it should be obvious why this UN document does not say anything about "pedophiles" being excluded in what the UN views as "the rights of everyone to express their sexual feelings."

Apart from the obvious indoctrination that the UN still plans for every child on this world, there are other "claims" made by this document which can be easily proven to be nothing but lies. For example:

Here is part of the beginning of the "foreword" of this document.

Foreword
Foreword
It has been almost a decade since the International technical guidance on sexuality education was first released in 2009. During this period, the global community has come to embrace a bold and transformative development agenda to achieve a just, equitable, tolerant, open and socially inclusive world in which the needs of the most vulnerable are met and where no one is left behind. The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development shows us that quality education, good health and well-being, gender equality and human rights are intrinsically intertwined.
...

unesdoc.unesco.org...

It's quite ironic that they start with such a claim when the UN in general, and other of it's member groups have been embroiled in several scandals, which include the attempt by the WHO Director General, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesusto, to name as "goodwill ambassador for Noncommunicable Diseases in Africa" known communist dictator H.E. President Robert Mugabe. As an aside note you should know that the WHO is a member of the United Nations Development Group, which is why I included some of the actions of WHO in this thread.

It should come as no surprise that Ghebreyesusto would try to make such nomination, when GHebreyesusto's main political affiliation is with the "Tigrayan People's Liberation Front", a communist party in Ethiopia which "has been listed as a perpetrator in the Global Terrorism Database, based on ten incidents occurring between 1976 and 1990". Ghebreyesusto's other known party affiliation is with the "Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front", the ruling political coalition in Ethiopia which consists of 4 political parties, one of them being the "Tigrayan People's Liberation Front".

This nomination was only rescinded when there was a backlash of protests against this nomination.

Director-General rescinds Goodwill Ambassador appointment

It's also quite ironic when WHO also named the Minister of Public Health Roberto Morales Ojeda of Cuba as President of the 67th World Health Assembly in 2014.

Cuban health minister designated President of the 67th World Health Assembly

So i ask myself, how is it possible that after all the scandals the UN has been involved into, and the obvious communist agenda that the UN and other world organizations like WHO have, why is it that there are still so many people who think the UN and WHO are trusted world organizations whose only interest is "the good of humanity" when they want to impose mandates which any decent person would be against?

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

The UN is a cesspool of Satanic Occultism.

Lucis Trust, Share International...

fellowshipoftheminds.com...

a reply to: infolurker

Yep. Back to the UN, perhaps some people weren't entirely aware that the former chief of the UN who set the agenda for 2030 is a corrupt communist, Irina Bokova, and it was she who in 2017 led the effort to seek a successor as UN chief as her position within the UN was frail due to the scandals she was involved in.

Bokova not only was part of the Bulgarian communist dictatorship in the 1970s, she graduated from the State Institute of International Relations in Moscow, which was controlled by the KGB to "prepare young apparatchiks for future tasks such as diplomats and agents". This preparation was as operatives who would promote international communism.

Unfortunately her successor isn't that far of, since Audrey Azoulay has stated that she is "very leftwing", and as we can see the new "UNESCO education guidance" continues the same work that Bokova started.

That's it. That's enough. It's time to pull out of the UN. It should have happened a long time ago, but now it really needs to happen.

They actually even admitted that there has been an ongoing agenda to push this crap on us. Many have pointed out this agenda, but this is the first time I've seen it officially acknowledged.

The epicenter of globalism.

Enemy #1 to freedom.

Enemy #1 to the USA.

Rotting us from within our own borders by destroying and degrading the minds and spirits of our people. Their first step was to secularize our nation. Their second step was to create idols to replace our non-secular belief system. Their third step was to push ideologies through their manufactured idols, destroying the moral fabric of our people. Their fourth step was to widen the divide between the newly berthed deviants and the folks that adhered to the 'good old days'. Their fifth step was to win over the masses and create an environment that would swallow those still adhering to that which made the USA great to begin with. We are on step five and watching leftism/progressivism attempt to shame and devour sanity.

Be vigilant. Is the objective to beat the encroaching enemy or to simply die with our honor and valor intact? Is this the battle for our souls?

This is NOT ok. Hopefully it'll end up being just one more nail in the coffin of the U.N. To me, it just sounds like an attempt to normalize whatever deviant behavior that they see fit. The U.N. is nothing but Affirmative action for sick, twisted @#$%s.

I'll wait before I comment any further, because I'm pretty sure that can't continue commenting and keep it compliant with the T&C here.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I'm skimming over this right now and the following is clearly inaccurate:

The mandatory "indoctrination" starts with teaching children of 5 years of age that masturbation is okay, but has to be private.

Here's the actual excerpt:



Sounds like the same sex ed we had in the 80s-90s — little kids are taught the difference between "good touching"/"bad touching" and pubescent children are taught about things that they're going to start experiencing, like arousal and given basic facts about things they're undoubtedly going to discover on their own, such as the fact that masturbation isn't harmful to your health.

The next block even goes into explaining how abstinence is the safest way to prevent pregnancy and avoid STDs and discussion of how their "plans for the future can be impacted" by their decisions. For instance, if you get knocked up and have a kid at 15, it pretty well screws your plans for the future.

I haven't read the whole thing but you're clearly wrong about the above which makes me wonder if you're not hyperventilating for no reason.

a reply to: theantediluvian

You are one of the few liberals i actually read. And you were right to post the actual content of the UN. On the other hand, you are short sighted. This is like mission creep. Once this is implemented, it will go a step or two further. There are already organizations who are trying to ttake this further. i have done that research. They start at what appears to be reasonable then slowly progress.

You seem unaware of the proclivities of those who run this world

Obviously these people are so behind the times that they make even Saudi Arabia seem like there current. Besides have they not heard? Anything your kids want to learn is online by the time they learn to watch a video on youtube or know what a search engine is. I mean just type sexual education into a search list or any program like google or youtube or # even facebook. You would be surprised what come up, anything from a parts and pieces list and which goes were and how, to porn stars teaching you the dos and donts of anal sex to even other chicks spouting there love of having sex with there dogs.

What you don't believe me.? Jeez, pretty sure ATS will 404 these vids, but there just there to prove a point that I think by the time there 15 years old kids may know more about sex then all the peoples and experts on the UN women's rights list or any other list or group they come up with. There all so behind the times, its like watching somebody go by in a horse and carriage down the highway, while everybody is zipping by at 70mph, you can only stare in wonder what the hell is there a parade going on today.

But ya, like total proof.

And well this stuff, I mean sure saudi arabia has a kiddy problem, and they seem to have a fetish for women dressed as ninjas, but would you be suprised that they also have this sort of fetish going on.

And you don't want to even see what they are into in Saudi Arabia or other of these UN nations or any nation across the globe are into behind all the silly paperwork they put out.