It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: smurfy
This story is from mid 2017, it is an opinion column in The Guardian.
Erm...
I wonder what they think in 2018?
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: DanDanDat
You are repeating trump. It was not a trillion dollar infrastructure bill:
“The stimulus was not primarily an infrastructure bill
In February 2009, Obama signed into law a stimulus package that ultimately cost just over $800 billion. (Earlier estimates had been higher, so we won’t quibble with Trump’s rounding it up to $1 trillion.)
The "shovel-ready" aspects of the stimulus tended to attract the most attention. But officially, that was only one of the act’s goals, and if you look closely at how the funds were allocated, only a fraction of the total was ever intended to go to infrastructure.”
www.politifact.com...
originally posted by: Murgatroid
...it is an opinion column in The Guardian...
Enough said...
Another 'Scam Alert': the MSM is anything BUT a credible source of truth.
NOT drinking the KoolAid...
This suggests that respected liberal media like the New York Times and Guardian are key battlegrounds in the relentless elite efforts to control public opinion. When the Guardian Media Group is owned by The Scott Trust Limited, a 'profit-seeking enterprise'?
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: smurfy
"Sorry, Donald. The only way we get this is if big corporations and the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes to support it."
They a;ready pay the majority of taxes.
A Pew Research Center analysis of IRS data from 2015, the most recent available, shows that taxpayers with incomes of $200,000 or more paid well over half (58.8%) of federal income taxes, though they accounted for only 4.5% of all returns filed (6.8% of all taxable returns).
And up until Trump, the US corporate tax rates was one of the highest on Earth.
Sorry, but your opinion piece and your OP is a scam.
originally posted by: DanDanDat
To whom did Obama's trillion dollar infrastructure money go? Why do we need to do this again only after 8 years?
originally posted by: xpert11
originally posted by: DanDanDat
To whom did Obama's trillion dollar infrastructure money go? Why do we need to do this again only after 8 years?
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Obama's, so called stimulus package hardly invested in infrastructure. This is why Trump's approach to rebuilding U.S. infrastructure is worth keeping an open mind about. Getting the ball rolling on rebuilding highways and airports would demonstrate to the voting public that actual infrastructure improvement can and are taking place. People could than demand that Trump's infrastructure go beyond the tip of the iceberg.
It remains to be seen if Congress is institutionally capable of implementing Trump's basic infrastructure package, little alone, coming to grips with the full extent of the country's needs.As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
originally posted by: xpert11
a reply to: smurfy
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Sorry, I meant the U.S. Federal Government must demonstrate to voters that they are institutionally capable of undertaking the rebuilding of the country's infrastructure. I didn't mean to imply that there was need to prove that investing in infrastructure is desperately required. If Obama's so called stimulus package had been a combination of Trump's plan, 750 billion dollars of funding and privatisation of airports/air traffic control, his legacy would have fared somewhat better.
Trump's infrastructure plan has flaws. There doesn't appear to be enough funding available for projects that aren't profitable for the private sector to take on board. Constructing the infrastructure behind fiber internet in the Rust Belt states, is the kind of project that the private sector will benefit from, but never want to undertake themselves. This is one of the reasons why I think it is important to get the ball rolling on rebuilding American infrastructure. The ideal infrastructure package won't get through Congress all in one go.As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
originally posted by: xpert11
a reply to: smurfyThe following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Did Trump's tax reform package go far enough in directing money away from off shore havens and the latest insane crazes (the last being subprime mortgages!) and into infrastructure? I am uncertain of the answer, but I lean towards, no.As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.