It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TheScale
a reply to: CaptainBeno
this is something that ive always found interesting aswell. i dont understand mathematics well enough to come to a conclusion but ive always wondered if its more a mathematical construct. something that if u look hard enough u can always find these things if u take the time and work out the formula to make it true.
supposedly an underground pyramid at that north pole spot that is comparable or larger in size than Giza is.
What are the mathematical chances...
this is something that ive always found interesting aswell. i dont understand mathematics well enough to come to a conclusion but ive always wondered if its more a mathematical construct. something that if u look hard enough u can always find these things if u take the time and work out the formula to make it true.
If they couldn’t, then the chances would be astronomical
Human social hierarchies are prominent in different domestic, work, and recreational settings, where they define implicit expectations and action dispositions that drive appropriate social behavior (Cummins, 2000). Furthermore, in humans, social status strongly predicts well-being, morbidity, and even survival (Boyce, 2004; Sapolsky, 2004, 2005). Festinger’s long-standing, prominent theory of social comparison processes (Festinger, 1954) suggests an important role for hierarchical rank in achieving accurate self-knowledge and self-improvement, particularly in the usage of upward social comparisons (Wheeler, 1966). Social hierarchies spontaneously and stably emerge in children as young as 2 years (Boyce, 2004; Cummins, 2000). Status within a social hierarchy is often made explicit (e.g., uniforms, honorifics, verbal assignment, or in some languages even through status-specific grammar (Pork, 1991)) but can also be inferred from cues such as facial features, height, gender, age, and dress (Karafin et al., 2004). In humans, dominance has been linked to heritable personality traits (Mehrabian, 1996); furthermore, superior status interacts with multiple neurotransmitter (Moskowitz et al., 2001) and neuroendocrine (Sapolsky, 2005) systems and can be automatically and efficiently inferred (Moors and De Houwer, 2005), indicating the existence of biological systems that process social rank information; yet virtually nothing is known about the neural representations of social hierarchies in humans. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
www.pinterest.com...