It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Anyone here who celebrates this is a damned hypocrite.
To think that government was honest, respectful, dignified before Trump is even more pathetic than a Kardashian on Jeopardy.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Trump's only problem, and thus the petulant public's main contention, is that he isn't good enough at lying.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
Spoken like a true zealot.
Spoken like a name-caller, or as we commonly know it, a child.
Trump's only problem, and thus the petulant public's main contention, is that he isn't good enough at lying.
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
Call me whatever you want, but your name-calling does nothing to dispute my arguments. Rather, it allows you to evade having to contend with them.
originally posted by: intrepid
Maybe setting himself up for a 2020 run? Is there any precedent for party members to challenge a president looking for a second term?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: jimmyx
hmmm.....I wonder what the percentage of lead-lined water pipes are in trump voting districts?
I was thinking it was eating paint chips as kids ... but that may be a point.
A valid description is not name calling and your ‘arguments’ are rarely anything more than generalizations and semantics. Should I see an actual argument with evidence from you, I’ll be glad to take you up on your kind offer.
originally posted by: pavil
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: jimmyx
hmmm.....I wonder what the percentage of lead-lined water pipes are in trump voting districts?
I was thinking it was eating paint chips as kids ... but that may be a point.
Jeez now we're back to the name calling and insulting half the Country shtick? That worked so well for you last election.
Good for you!
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
A valid description is not name calling and your ‘arguments’ are rarely anything more than generalizations and semantics. Should I see an actual argument with evidence from you, I’ll be glad to take you up on your kind offer.
Pretending that you listen to argument and evidence is betrayed the moment someone shows you some. You only redouble your efforts, like a charlatan.