It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think I understand...sort of like a race debit card.
You only get a racial debit card if you match the race you are stealing from, deprecating, and they love you regardless, because you are one of their own.
To me, he is an uncle tom. That's the worst sort of racism, but it's somehow embraced.
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: DexterRiley
George is no Pryor or Murphy.
George is not funny.
originally posted by: DexterRiley
a reply to: Khaleesi
I understand your point. And certainly that would have been the more pragmatic approach on George's part.
However, I'm pretty sure George Lopez is known for this type of humor as being at the core of his routine. Wouldn't it have been better for the charity to book a more politically benign comedian?
George Lopez got some great coverage and he is laughing all the way to the bank. Just like Stephen Colbert did after the 2006 White House Correspondents' Dinner.
-dex
originally posted by: DexterRiley
a reply to: TheWhiteKnight
Richard Pryor and Redd Foxx did the same thing. That is, pushing racial stereotypes to the extreme. These men were revered in most of the black community, they certainly weren't considered self-loathing racists. Although some of the old folks didn't hold with his prolific use of the N-word.
In fact the image I get from your example is so extreme, I know it's fiction. Latinos know it's fiction, and they're well aware of the Latino racial stereotypes. I can't speak for their community, but I assume they probably find his over-the-top racist humor to be funny.
-dex
Pull up! Pull Up!
The big difference here is that Richard Pryor and Redd Foxx were actually funny. Gods of comedy, you might say. Pryor a bit more that Foxx. Not even in the same UNIVERSE as Lopez.
That being said, stand-up comedy is a tricky thing. One comedian can tell one joke that would KILL with a certain audience, but the same joke may mail miserably with a different comedian, or a different audience, or even a different point in time. Fickle thing, comedy.
Some comedians (ahem) lazily assume that there is a common denominator in an audience when no such common denominator exists. Well, that and the fact that some comedians are just not that funny.
Although I do agree that comedy, in general, has to absolutely be free to cover ANY subject, the bottom line is, the audience is the ultimate judge, and if a comic fails, it's ALWAYS the comic's responsibility, and never the audience's.
originally posted by: MteWamp
Pull up! Pull Up!
The big difference here is that Richard Pryor and Redd Foxx were actually funny. Gods of comedy, you might say. Pryor a bit more that Foxx. Not even in the same UNIVERSE as Lopez.
That being said, stand-up comedy is a tricky thing. One comedian can tell one joke that would KILL with a certain audience, but the same joke may mail miserably with a different comedian, or a different audience, or even a different point in time. Fickle thing, comedy.
Some comedians (ahem) lazily assume that there is a common denominator in an audience when no such common denominator exists. Well, that and the fact that some comedians are just not that funny.
Although I do agree that comedy, in general, has to absolutely be free to cover ANY subject, the bottom line is, the audience is the ultimate judge, and if a comic fails, it's ALWAYS the comic's responsibility, and never the audience's.