Paitient Seventeen (2017) Offical .

I for one look forward to watching this documentary.
By far one of the most odd things to happen to a human being,implanted with
technology that’s far in advance of what we may be able to produce.

And what’s the deal with it? so many questions.
No scientist funded by there sponsors will touch anything to do with the word UFO or related stuff.
I understand the correct term used by the 3 letter agency's is phenomenology.

S & F

originally posted by: jeep3r
a reply to: Kapusta

Good filmmaking and especially great "teasing".

So they have the smoking gun and instead of forming a task force of specialists from relevant branches of the global science community to verify the evidence they do what?

Pres-sales on iTunes? Information on a website called "extraordinarybeliefs"? That doesn't necessarily add to their credibility. Of course everybody hopes this is the smoking gun, but I'm not sure whether their methods and results would hold up to scrutiny.

More then just Dr. LIER was involed in trying to figure out what exactly these implants are .

Aliens are sizeless.

Los Alamos are you listening ? Hire me if you can find me.



a reply to: stealthyaroura

I’ve seen a few documentaries with Dr Leir....truly fascinating stuff and he has collected some great evidence through the years.

I hope they show the one where he and his team try to remove an implant from a patient....only for the implant to burrow deeper into the patient’s flesh....they show this on a X-ray video...each time the scalpel gets near the implant it moves!....

Some crazy shizzle....looking forward to watching this....thanks.

S&F

a reply to: bluetrees

Its U-236, which is weird. Its not natural, but its not really hard to come by, its considered a contaminant in nuclear fuel and its not something desirable in a uranium based nuclear or thermonuclear weapon either.

Here on earth we usually consider it to be a waste product, and a long lived one at that (Half-life is like 235 million years) but its not very energetic obviously or the half-life would be a lot less, and it barely puts out thermal radiation on its own.

The thing that intrigues me is it can turn into Plutonium 238 if it captures two neutrons at specific times during its rather long decay cycle. And if you know your radioactive elements, you know what we use Pu238 for. Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators like on the Voyagers and Cassini (among other spacecraft) and also older pacemakers, it puts out heat like there's no tomorrow and if you're looking for an easily detected signature that those dumb, self-important apes blasted themselves into oblivion, the heat that the Pu238 would put out would work pretty well for it. Its an elegant solution really.

Just a thought, otherwise I can't explain why they'd use it, and also why they'd use it with Iridium. Since I don't know what Isotope it is I can't say what would logically make sense for it being there. However, if the Iridium is an isotope that puts out neutron radiation, it may also be a nuclear battery via the U-236 decay route.

a reply to: Kapusta

So they claim all these renowned institutes were involved but we have to read about it in a popular article published in "Un-X magazine"? Perhaps I'm missing something but wouldn't such incredible results also be featured on their own sites, in scientific journals or at least on a public platform like arxiv.org?

Instead, they want us to watch the film or buy the book (which is being advertised at the end of the article) to find out more about their alleged earthshaking insights. Sounds more like a $$$ enterprise to me, than a rigorous scientific investigation.

Dr. Roger Leir

a reply to: Kapusta

Kind of weird that they sent it to Los Alamos to have the theoretical types poke at it. They're good, don't get me wrong, but they're not quite as practical as the other lab here.

Sandia's the more materials science focused NNSA lab in NM and where the materials scientists and engineers who would have the best insights into whatever weirdness these things are would be.

Ffs man. If you feel that way then don't watch it.

It's that simple . I disagree with your opnion.

And so what if they are seeking some return off the film. They may have invested a chunk of money making it .

What a the big deal ?

a reply to: Kapusta

You're welcome to disagree, of course.

I'm just saying that such outrageous claims justify a few questions (and a little doubt).

I don't mind entrepreneurs with a good product to get generously remunerated, but I feel this may be something different. I have no problems being the "bad guy" in case their claims turn out to be legit, but until then I remain highly doubtful.

originally posted by: tiredoflooking
Can't wait to watch!

Don't know if it'll be any different than this youtube video posted December 31, 2010 entitled "SURGICAL REMOVAL OF ALIEN IMPLANTS - Special Update - Dr. Roger Leir"

a reply to: eNaR

.....and Dr. Roger Leir is in this one too.

a reply to: jeep3r

the baltic sea anomaly was the real deal

a reply to: humanoidlord

Exactly

For how long did they exploit that blurry sonar image and an artist's rendition of what looked like the millenium falcon? Two years, three years? They truly did milk that cash cow... $$$

originally posted by: jeep3r
a reply to: humanoidlord

Exactly

For how long did they exploit that blurry sonar image and an artist's rendition of what looked like the millenium falcon? Two years, three years? They truly did milk that cash cow... $$$

So aliens are indeed helping people sometimes with indirect financial help? That's cool!

a reply to: jeep3r

seriously
the drag marks in the ocean, are proof that it came from the sky

a reply to: jeep3r

msm did milk the cash cow on it - and they occasionally still do. not so much the original finders of the "anomaly" .they only lost money trying to find out what they found.

originally posted by: jeep3r
a reply to: Kapusta

Good filmmaking and especially great "teasing".

So they have the smoking gun and instead of forming a task force of specialists from relevant branches of the global science community to verify the evidence they do what?

Pres-sales on iTunes? Information on a website called "extraordinarybeliefs"? That doesn't necessarily add to their credibility. Of course everybody hopes this is the smoking gun, but I'm not sure whether their methods and results would hold up to scrutiny.

No only but arming themselves with 'stud finders' . Some hi tech there.

Many people have embedded bits of metal from trauma associated with their occupation, accidents, hobbies, war, etc.

Stone and wood too, but thats not very aleeen tech, is it?

These "discoveries" have been circulating for two decades. A&S Research was founded by Dr. Leir and is not a reliable unbiased scientific source. The labs listed have provided no supporting scientific data to back up Leir's alien implant claims.

Part of the process of a new scientific discovery begins with publishing those results in refereed journals so they can be scrutinized and questioned by others in the community. This includes providing data and their sources to back up those claims. Because of the enormity of the extraterrestrial claim, physical evidence would be required to be freely available and undergo stringent testing by scientists and labs with no bias.

Leir avoids scientific scrutiny and goes the route of the public to make his discoveries known. He did this because he knew his evidence would not stand up to the standards of science. His alternative is to go for the gullible and naive that are easily swayed, impressed, and don't require scientific confirmation.