It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Phantom423
Exactly...
That's how evolutionists attempt to explain away the the irreducible complexity of the flagellar motor that it evolved into existence...
And that the necessary parts that make up the motors preexisted before they were motors then decided to become the motors...
Except that does nothing to explain how those purposed 30 odd pieces of proteins magically fit together in shape and chemical makeup...
The truth is they have all the information always have and are self replicating...
This is irreducible complexity...
originally posted by: Phantom423
Your thinking is very obviously flawed. First, the explanation that "God did it" requires no evidence. It has no evidence.
Second, the explanation "evolution did it" is not imaginary. There's a process in place which has been elucidated, albeit you never bothered to even try to understand it.
The difference is process. The difference is evidence. The difference is you don't have a clue.
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Phantom423
Your thinking is very obviously flawed. First, the explanation that "God did it" requires no evidence. It has no evidence.
Second, the explanation "evolution did it" is not imaginary. There's a process in place which has been elucidated, albeit you never bothered to even try to understand it.
The difference is process. The difference is evidence. The difference is you don't have a clue.
I studied evolution for over a decade and believed it until empirical evidence made me realize it was an invalid opinion.
SOCRATES: Do you think the one who had gotten out of the cave would still envy those within the
cave and would want to compete with them who are esteemed and who have power? Or would not he or
she much rather wish for the condition above ground? Wouldn't he or she prefer to put up with absolutely anything
else rather than associate with those opinions that hold in the cave and be that kind of human being?
GLAUCON: I think that he would prefer to endure everything rather than be that kind of human
being
Proponents of evolution scrutinize how theists explain things away by "God did it", while at the same time they use a similar statement "evolution did it"... followed by an imaginary explanation of how, for example, a caterpillar would have managed a mutation that would suffice it to liquefy itself in a cocoon, grow wings, and fly away.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: cooperton
You have provided zero evidence you have studied science. Your posts are aping typical young earth creationist nonsense. Next you will be trying to tell me this mythical flood of your bible formed the Grand Canyon
originally posted by: 5StarOracle
a reply to: Phantom423
Exactly...
That's how evolutionists attempt to explain away the the irreducible complexity of the flagellar motor that it evolved into existence...
And that the necessary parts that make up the motors preexisted before they were motors then decided to become the motors...
Except that does nothing to explain how those purposed 30 odd pieces of proteins magically fit together in shape and chemical makeup...
The truth is they have all the information always have and are self replicating...
This is irreducible complexity...
originally posted by: Phantom423
you ignore the fact that evolution is a process, a process which is well known and has been tested repeatedly.
EVOLUTION HAS EVIDENCE (remember the 500 journals and thousands of research articles which I HAVE POSTED A HUNDRED TIMES)
originally posted by: cooperton
originally posted by: Phantom423
you ignore the fact that evolution is a process, a process which is well known and has been tested repeatedly.
whales remain whales
Evolution relies on extrapolations for its assumed validity. Just because organisms can adapt does not mean they can cross into another type of organism. Prokaryotes remain prokaryotes, whales remain whales, humans remain humans. Of course adaptability is a proven, observable mechanism, but proponents of evolution extrapolate this data and assume it could account for the diversity of life we see today.
THIS IS THE PHILOSOPHY YOU ARE TEACHING