The truth comes out about the manhandled nurse...

.


The viral video of a police officer manhandling a nurse who would t break the law and hospital policy to draw blood from an unconscious patient, has come with a lot of false info..

Some were saying it was a onbviously drunk driver who was just the cause of a near fatal accident.

Some were saying it was a random DUI who was part of a one car accident.


The truth is WAY worse...


The actual patient was a part time officer who was 100% the victim in a high speed pursuit gone wrong...

He wasn't the drunk driver.. he was the victim!!!!!


Appearently they were attempting to mitigate any liability the Police department might face for the high speed pursuit...

They were hoping he was drinking so they could blame the victim for the wreck...


One officer even specifically ordered the officer in question to escalate to situation to get the blood..

So this wasn't just one cop..


I have no idea how people do not recognize the institutional problems with our law enforcement..

If only 1% of cops are bad, then how do we keep seeming multiple officers covering up misconduct???

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
Fixing now.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
Fixing now.

I don't believe you.

Appearently they were attempting to mitigate any liability the Police department might face for the high speed pursuit...

I think thats already been discussed.

But you're right. The police force potential accidents by chasing fleeing suspects in their cruisers, lights blaring, to get their man.

Makes every bit of sense they blame the resulting chaos on the public that happened to get in their way...

a reply to: network dude

So what is the point in posting ??? Just to be first???

Everyone knows the phone version is prone to sending OPs early..

a reply to: intrptr

Do y'all get off on posting first or something???

I mean how bored do you gotta be to troll any threads sent early..

a reply to: MantheDevilsApe

Since I don't recognize your name, I'll assume you didn't know the phone version of ATS is prone to sending threads early.... it is a daily occurrence.

a reply to: JoshuaCox
I don't doubt what you are saying, although it would be nice to see a link to some sort of story that confirms it.

I wouldn't care if the guy was just some schmuck that was drunk, the police still handled it incorrectly. The nurse should sue the cop that arrested her and the University cops that allowed it to happen.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

There's a 50 page thread on this already.

Perhaps you might post your unsourced claim there.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: intrptr

Do y'all get off on posting first or something???

I mean how bored do you gotta be to troll any threads sent early..

Its called marking a place. I had to , it wasn't a thread until you got it straight. You'll see by my edited post this is nothing new. If you are done derailing your own bump start...

they kie and coverup crimes all the tine, its part of their culture

Where is the proof of any "truth" coming out ? I see absolute zero links , no basis . Only someone typing words in an empty box.

I have no idea how people do not recognize the institutional problems with our law enforcement..

Who is "our" ? That can embrace many folk .
What is a "part time" officer ? All the ones I know are full time.

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
The patient was a officer who was the victim

they were attempting to mitigate Police liability

They were hoping he was drinking so they could blame the victim

that doesnt make sense, if the police officer was the victim then the police department is not at fault.... if the police department is not at fault then revealing their officer as drunk does not help them....

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: network dude

So what is the point in posting ??? Just to be first???

Everyone knows the phone version is prone to sending OPs early..

It just makes me smile. So suck it up buttercup. Big boys understand that when they make a mistake, others may laugh at them. Be that guy.

ETA: and after reading your OP, I still don't believe you.

originally posted by: Gothmog
Where is the proof of any "truth" coming out ? I see absolute zero links , no basis . Only someone typing words in an empty box.

I have no idea how people do not recognize the institutional problems with our law enforcement..

Who is "our" ? That can embrace many folk .
What is a "part time" officer ? All the ones I know are full time.

They have part time officers here where I live in PA.
They may work for other jurisdictions part time after retiring from another, or do part time work for several jurisdictions when their domestic partner has a job that covers them for health insurance.

a reply to: intrptr

Marking your place on a thread you don't even know the contents of... isn't that literally the definition of "getting off on posting first?"

originally posted by: butcherguy

They have part time officers here where I live in PA.

We also have auxiliary police here in New Jersey which are unpaid volunteers, I guess this means they only like donuts part of the time and only trample on some of your rights.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Do you have any links or proof of your theory?
A bad source is better than no source.
At least then we can pick apart something.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: butcherguy

They have part time officers here where I live in PA.

We also have auxiliary police here in New Jersey which are unpaid volunteers, I guess this means they only like donuts part of the time and only trample on some of your rights.

Negative. It means they have a better handle on their donut addiction than the rest of us, and are still learning how to best abuse rights.

Found this video.