It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So yeah, I'm a geology dropout who's typing this up in a completely unrelated class so neither my prose nor my research are up to par, but it's a start. Also, rumors suggest that the Corp of Engineers working with the Park Service has Old Faithful rigged with subterranean waterworks to maintain the illusion of regularity.
The way the theory works is that the geyser was discovered in 1870 and it erupted like clockwork “for a long while”. Then it started becoming irregular in the 1940s and 1950s. To combat this problem, an underground pipeline runs from the nearby Firehole River to pumps beneath the Old Faithful Lodge and back to the new Mecha-Old Faithful. This work was probably done during a 1956 Old Faithful Lodge “laundry room” renovation [pdf source link].
originally posted by: redhorse
a reply to: underwerks
No. Old Faithful is a natural phenomenon.
It is Old Unfaithful now though. I took my daughter to see it some 12 years ago and it was notoriously unreliable then and worse now. Although it was still ticking along pretty close to clockwork when I saw it as a kid in the 80's.
what would happen if you nuked Yellowstone?
Is the Old Faithful geyser fake?
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: underwerks
what would happen if you nuked Yellowstone?
Do nukes generally penetrate the ground before detonation, or do they detonate above ground?
Is the Old Faithful geyser fake?
...
Oh boy.
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Liquesence
Nukes would be detonated well above ground..air burst will cause much more damage than on the ground or below.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: underwerks
what would happen if you nuked Yellowstone?
Do nukes generally penetrate the ground before detonation, or do they detonate above ground?
Is the Old Faithful geyser fake?
...
Oh boy.
I don't believe it's fake, lmao.
I just thought it was a neat conspiracy I'd never heard before. And by this point, I've heard everything.
originally posted by: bananashooter
Its funny you bring that up because I live in Calistoga, Ca and we have a lot of geothermal activity here. Anyway we have a tourist attraction called the old faithful geyser and everyone who tours here thinks its legit, well its not, its rigged with a valve and its on a well pump, so maybe if my town does it, so do they.
originally posted by: redhorse
a reply to: underwerks
No. Old Faithful is a natural phenomenon.
It is Old Unfaithful now though. I took my daughter to see it some 12 years ago and it was notoriously unreliable then and worse now. Although it was still ticking along pretty close to clockwork when I saw it as a kid in the 80's.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: redhorse
a reply to: underwerks
No. Old Faithful is a natural phenomenon.
It is Old Unfaithful now though. I took my daughter to see it some 12 years ago and it was notoriously unreliable then and worse now. Although it was still ticking along pretty close to clockwork when I saw it as a kid in the 80's.
It's still very predictable and the forest service can predict it within 10 min. What has happened after 1989 their was an earth quake that increased the average time between eruptions. Averages about 60 to 90 min. The tune difference depends on how long the previous eruption was. Anything under 2.5 min takes 60 min to reset. Over that and it's 90 min on the average it erupts 17 times a day. As for pipes that's just stupid this water would have eaten any pipes installed within a year or two.
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: Liquesence
Nukes would be detonated well above ground..air burst will cause much more damage than on the ground or below.