Police stop & search

a reply to: seasonal

Yeah like those stupid kids in America dressing up as clowns and terrorising people.....

a reply to: RazorV66

If I was wanting 3 machetes, I would have not bought them right after the bridge "incident".

But he is legally in his rights to have them. I would imagine in court he will win a suit-that is if you guys have that sort of remedy to this infringement of rights.

originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: macpdm

Curious, are you for or against this?

Did the guy have a warrant?

Was he doing anything wrong?

Or is this part of the horrible crime on the bridge?

Give me a little to work with please.

not for it but not against it

What was the source of the cops 'reasonable suspicion in relation to what occured on a bridge in london in times prior to the day and time of arrest, and the bloke concerned.

What is the definiton of suspicion and what is the definiton of reasonable as applied to suspicion?

Did the cops require a warrent under the law they were acting under?

What law were the cops relying on for their cause of action?

If the law the cops were acting under required a warrant was it legally issued according the Act and Regualtions governing the issue of warrants for arrest.


Betchya it was some terro law they were acting on.