The Jared Kushner story is a perfect example of fake news

It's obvious that the NY Times, Washington Post, MSNBC and CNN are trying to take down a democratically elected President with story after story with unnamed sources. Sadly for them, most people know that most of this is politically motivated nonsense.

The Kushner story is a prime example.

This isn't news at all.

First, they said that Kushner is "under scrutiny by the F.B.I."

WHAT????

This is just ASININE. Of course he's under scrutiny because there's an investigation and everyone associated with the Trump tansition team will be under scrutiny in order to be cleared.

The Washington Post and others wanted to say "under F.B.I. investigation" but they couldn't. This is where they created fake news.

They decided to use the word "scrutiny" to imply Kushner was under investigation. This is creating FAKE NEWS!

I went on Twitter to see if people talking about Kushner would be saying he was under F.B.I. investigation and sure enough, liberal after liberal was celebrating that Kushner was under F.B.I. Investigation.

The post used the word scrutiny on purpose to make it look like Kushner was being investigated. Again, this is creating FAKE NEWS!

You could have easily said Kushner is being looked at by the F.B.I. in order to be cleared.

The Post, CNN and other outlets would never say this because they just wanted the "Breaking News" story because they think it hurts Trump. This is what was said in the 5th paragraph of the story:

The Post has not been told that Kushner is a target — or the central focus — of the investigation, and he has not been accused of any wrongdoing. “Target” is a word that generally refers to someone who is the main suspect of investigators’ attention, though prosecutors can and do bring charges against people who are not marked with that distinction.

Again, there's no story here. It's just the liberal media creating fake news.

a reply to: neoholographic

Again, I don't think there's any kind of agenda here. The media corporations are just trying to make money. Innuendo makes guys like you mad. Once you are mad they get you to watch so you can complain. Just stop watching it is how you get back at them. I no longer watch any cable news or visit any corporate media website. This story is great example of having NOTHING to do with my life. So what's the point of it all??????

Rage = Ratings = Money

The walls are cracking all around them, and all you guys can say is "fake news!" because there is little else as a justification or a substantive argument to hold onto your petty disillusions His Greatness.

It's becoming amusing, actually.

So how do they plan on "taking him down" if they know their stories are fake news? If it's fake then they have no chance of taking him down because it's false information and will never hold up in a court of law.

What they're doing is playing with the emotions and biases of the American people and others abroad, nothing more or less. It's propaganda aimed at both sides so that tensions will rise between the people.

The media doesn't really have a beef with Trump, at least not the ones who tell the anchors what to talk about, the owners of the media. All this is is a psyop with Trump being a willing participant to divide the American people down party lines. It's working and people are absolutely eating it up.

Sad!

a reply to: dfnj2015

That's just nonsense. You said:

Again, I don't think there's any kind of agenda here.

LOL, you can't be serious? Of course there's an agenda. They don't like Trump.

Case in point: Harvard released a study last week that analyzed The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and the main newscasts on CBS, CNN, Fox and NBC during Mr. Trump’s first 100 days. No shocker here: 80 percent was negative, just 20 percent positive.

That’s a big change from the past. When the Chosen One, Barack Obama, completed his first 100 days, a similar study found that coverage was 59 percent positive, 41 percent negative. Skewed, but not that bad. The numbers were flipped for George W. Bush, of course: 57 percent negative, 43 percent positive. For Bill Clinton, way back in 1993, in the days when news was news (which means reporters were hard on the president regardless of his political affiliation), the coverage was 60 percent negative, 40 percent positive.

“The Harvard team found that CBS coverage was 91 percent negative and 9 percent positive. New York Times coverage was 87 percent negative and 13 percent positive,” Byron York wrote in the Washington Examiner. “Washington Post coverage was 83 percent negative and 17 percent positive. Wall Street Journal coverage was 70 percent negative and 30 percent positive. And Fox News coverage also leaned to the negative, but only slightly: 52 percent negative to 48 percent positive.”

www.washingtontimes.com...

You have to have your head buried in the sand if you think they don't have an agenda.

Secondly, if it has nothing to do with your life, WHY ARE YOU HERE?

Some people care about the news in the world today. If you want to bury your head and remain ignorant that's your choice.

I find it funny that you said it has nothing to do with your life but you're taking time to comment on it!

originally posted by: Liquesence
The walls are cracking all around them, and all you guys can say is "fake news!" because there is little else as a justification or a substantive argument to hold onto your petty disillusions His Greatness.

It's becoming amusing, actually.

We'll see who's laughing in 2020 when he gets re-elected.

originally posted by: neoholographic
It's obvious that the NY Times, Washington Post, MSNBC and CNN are trying to take down a democratically elected President with story after story with unnamed sources. Sadly for them, most people know that most of this is politically motivated nonsense.

The Kushner story is a prime example.

This isn't news at all.

First, they said that Kushner is "under scrutiny by the F.B.I."

WHAT????

Again, there's no story here. It's just the liberal media creating fake news.

Well, they did say he's a person of interest, and the White House has said Kushner did have talks with Russian officials, plus Kushner was a prime advocate to the firing of Comey, so there is a story of some kind, and I don't think that the White house is chief staffed with an abundance of ethics, or prisoners of conscience...all very cagey boyos.

"Under scrutiny"
"Sources reveal"
"Information obtained"

And my favorite one...
"Sources familiar with Comey's thinking"

News media has literally become a parody of itself.

a reply to: Konduit

You can't make this stuff up!

"Sources familiar with Comey's thinking"

This could be the person that cuts his lawn whose "familiar with Comey's thinking" because he hears some of his conversations.

What's also shameful is the obvious pattern

NY Times or the Post comes out with a story filled with unnamed sources. The story immediately becomes "Bombshell Breaking News" on CNN and MSNBC and they report the story as if it's true.

Sadly, the Republicans in Washington are spineless. This is why Trump needs to say,"Get Me Roger Stone."



A very good documentary and if they go low, we should play the same game.

a reply to: neoholographic

He has 80% negative press because 90% of his actions are negative. Just look at his behavior this week, I don't think even Spicer or Conway could spin that in a positive light LMAO!!!

a reply to: conspiracy nut

What???

Only a liberal will think Trump had a bad week. He had a great week without looking weak like Obama.

Yes, NATO Countries should pay their fair share. They enjoyed a free lunch with Obama the king of red lines being drawn in erasable crayon.

In Saudi he made a $350 billion deal which included a 110 billion arms deal negotiated by Kushner. This is another reason why he's being attacked.

It's no surprise that the media is going after Kushner because he has become Trump's top advisor.

Remember when the media thought Bannon was Trump's top advisor he was in the news everyday being called a racist. You never hear about Bannon anymore they now have Kushner derangement syndrome.

The King of Saudi wouldn't even greet weak Obama at the airport.

a reply to: neoholographic

Remember when the media thought Bannon was Trump's top advisor he was in the news everyday being called a racist. You never hear about Bannon anymore they now have Kushner derangement syndrome. 

That's a very good point.

It looks like Jared is selling out the old man.....

www.thedailybeast.com...

www.breitbart.com...

uh oh....

Republicans can't throw fits about Clinton's money connections for years then not expect same treatment for Trump's. Lock him up. Lock him up. Lock him up. Ready to talk about our failed nation instead money people yet?

a reply to: olaru12

it only gets bigger:

FOX NEWS: Jared Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Russia, new report alleges

Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and one of the senior advisers in the Trump administration, was seeking a private communications channel with the Kremlin, according to a new report in The Washington Post.

Kushner and Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak spoke of the possibility of coordinating a secret and secure communications channel between the Trump transition team and the Kremlin, the paper said.

Kushner suggested the use of Russian diplomatic facilities as a way to shield their pre-inauguration discussions from monitoring, U.S. officials briefed on intelligence reports told The Post.

But I guess it's all fake news, even though the Senate intelligence committee is now requesting documents and logs from the trump Admin.

Oh dear. lol

This is interesting....

www.rawstory.com...

Wouldn't it be ironic if Jared ratted out Trump!

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: olaru12

it only gets bigger:

FOX NEWS: Jared Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Russia, new report alleges

Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and one of the senior advisers in the Trump administration, was seeking a private communications channel with the Kremlin, according to a new report in The Washington Post.

Kushner and Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak spoke of the possibility of coordinating a secret and secure communications channel between the Trump transition team and the Kremlin, the paper said.

Kushner suggested the use of Russian diplomatic facilities as a way to shield their pre-inauguration discussions from monitoring, U.S. officials briefed on intelligence reports told The Post.

But I guess it's all fake news, even though the Senate intelligence committee is now requesting documents and logs from the trump Admin.

Oh dear. lol

LOL, you can't be serious!!

This isn't news!!

Every administration has back channels to different countries.

Remember this story about Obama? I'm sure you don't because the news media didn't go crazy about these stories.

FLASHBACK – Reports: Obama’s 2008 Campaign Reps Talked with Iran, Hamas

In 2008, Robert Malley stepped down as an informal foreign policy adviser to Obama’s campaign when it was revealed that he met with Hamas members.

Malley admitted to the meetings, but he claimed he met with the terrorists as part of his private job.

“I have never hidden the fact that I had meetings with Hamas,” Malley wrote in an open letter published in the New York Times. “I do this as part of my job as Middle East program director at the International Crisis Group.”

He said he distanced himself from Obama’s campaign because the Hamas meetings were “becoming a distraction to me and to Senator Obama’s campaign, and to avoid any misperception — misrepresentation being the more accurate word — about the candidate’s position regarding the Islamist movement.”

Malley later joined the Obama administration. In 2015, he was appointed to lead the Middle East desk of the National Security Council.

He was also named Obama’s special adviser regarding the Islamic State.

www.breitbart.com...

I'm sure you or the liberal media didn't make a big deal about this. It gets worse:

Meanwhile, in August 2014, Michael Ledeen, a former consultant to the National Security Council and U.S. Defense Department, penned a column at PJ Media stating Obama opened a back-channel to Iran during the 2008 presidential campaign. Ledeen said the back channel went through retired Ambassador William G. Miller, who also led the 1979 negotiating mission during the Iran hostage crisis. Ladeen wrote that Miller confirmed his back-channel involvement to him.

www.breitbart.com...

OBAMA OPENED A BACK CHANNEL WITH IRAN!!!

WHERE WAS THE CRYING LIBERALS AND FAKE MEDIA OUTRAGE THEN??

What makes this so bad is Obama bent over backwards for Iran and turned his back on our Sunni allies in the region.

originally posted by: olaru12
This is interesting....

www.rawstory.com...

Wouldn't it be ironic if Jared ratted out Trump!

Again, more FAKE NEWS!!

Why is this even a news story?

EVERYBODY KNEW TRUMP WANTED TO WORK WITH RUSSIA ON TERRORISM INSTEAD OF STARTING WW3 LIKE THE NEOCONS WANTED HIM TO!!

Why wouldn't Kushner establish a back channel like every other administration does with different Countries?

WHERE WAS THE MEDIA WHEN OBAMA ESTABLISHED A BACK CHANNEL WITH IRAN???

Why the obsession with Obama...he's gone, Hilldog lost! They don't do squat to legitimize your position.

a reply to: neoholographic

Lol,

"Fake News"/Damage control commence in...

3..

2..

1..

Sorry if your head is exploding, sugar.