It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm an Englishman...
The 2nd amendment was created in a time where current weapons didn't exist, so my thoughts are that the right to bear arms, as written then, is not automatically applicable today.
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: fencesitter85
I'm an Englishman...
That's about the point most of your readership will trail off.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: fencesitter85
Too many other people have better ways of stating their positions.
When you put restrictions on a right, it then becomes a privilege.
As for the age of the 2nd Amendment? Computers weren't around, so should we "re-do" the 1st Amendment as well?
Gun ownership is a right. I like it that way, don't see any need to change it.
Gun ownership isn't mandatory. If you don't want them, don't get them.
Now I'll turn the thread over to smarter people.
originally posted by: Idreamofme
a reply to: fencesitter85
Depression? That's a little overboard. And no, not all felons are serial murderers.
You can't give the government an inch cuz they will take everything. The public will be fighting with sling shots.
Basically, you can write all the laws you want on a piece of paper, but if someone wants a gun they will get it.
Law-abiding citizens are the ones getting punished and when that burglar shows up with his AK? What you gonna do?
originally posted by: seasonal
a reply to: fencesitter85
Are you under the impression that the "assault" rifles (fully auto) are not well regulated?
originally posted by: Masterjadenit it was clearly intended to prevent tyranny from forming by allowing the populous the means to fight back against a tyrannical government.