It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Caver78
But it's not my job to do theirs...
Under that middle management cretin, yes it does. I know you've seen the type too. The rule their department like a tyrant, their entrenched bureaucracy (in this case some filing system) is too complex to figure out, and god forbid someone should look too close at it, thus incurring their wrath in the form of tirades and insult. They fire at the drop of a hat, keeping only those that go along with their incompetent, bureaucratic maze.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: intrptr
They aren't 'managing' where Poster works...
Your comment, 'cycling employees is what management wants', is ignorant for multiple reasons, most of all because you are not there and do not know what 'management wants' and that the financial aspect makes zero sense.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
Training replacements costs more usually than keeping the ones you have.
Exactly. I would rather retrain or use an improvement plan on a underperformer than fire them while rewarding the better employees with merit increases than have them go elsewhere and take all their tribal knowledge and skills with them.
Once you get into long term employees With a decade of raises , it shifts a little im sure.
I'm sure it would but I think people with that much experience should occasionally test the interview waters to see if their valuation is commensurate with their skill set.