Did The CIA Just Stage A Micro-Coup Against Trump Administration?

There is a power struggle brewing I guess between 'establishment' and 'established politicians'.

The 'establishment' (bigger crooks) got their direct appointee, avoiding middleman ('established politicians') . Trump himself admitted that he played them as his pawns to make billions. NSA/CIA/FBI/MIC/Police state in this country loves Trump.

I am not a big fan of our alphabet agencies (or previous administration), but what if these leaks are coming from guys with good intentions for our country. This country is getting sold to the highest bidder. In whatever way you look at, we have the greediest guy in office, who deals in billions of dollars with countries like Saudi, UAE and Russia.

If he loves our country and the people so much, why don't he release his tax return to public so that we know either way his foreign dealings?

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
The "establishment" elites are in full-on panic-mode and on the run!

They've been shielded and protected for so long the concept of reality doesn't enter into their thought process. You can hear "This is most dire!!!" echoing off the walls of DC, London, France and other places from thousands of miles away!

The ironic part is they perceive Trump as the cause, but in reality the entire WORLD is onto their game...and the gig is up!

Beautifully worded. This is definitely the case. And it Troubles me greatly that the focus is on Trump, but in reality it's we the people banging on the drums of independence. Like 1776 rebelling against 1984. And it will only get louder.

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: introvert

Flynn was right that Obama's attitude towards terrorism was dangerous. Flynn standing up to him about that just boosted Flynn in my opinion .

That, of course, is your opinion.

originally posted by: tribal
a reply to: introvert

that actually has ZERO to do with the allegation Flynn was fired/let go from his Obama post because he was doing a "terrible job".


what else you got?

Do you consider being insubordinate a quality of someone that does a "good job"?

originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: introvert

Flynn was right that Obama's attitude towards terrorism was dangerous. Flynn standing up to him about that just boosted Flynn in my opinion .

Remember when the first "Bush" said he wanted our country to be a "kinder, gentler nation?". Well that didn't happen until Obama. If we can find a way to accomplish peace in this screwed up, dog eat dog, murderous world we live in, then that's the way to go.

"Turning them to glass", waging war, and killing is a heinous and horrible way to go. It's for those who don't have the diligence, perseverance, or intellect to devise other methods of accomplishing it. It's like ISIS. If it scares you, kill it.

Do I want the terrorism to stop? Of course I do. I wish we could isolate Isis and smash them to bits. But we can't. Too much collateral damage. Slow and steady wins the race. Not kill them all. That's a win for NO ONE.

Stopping immigration is the definition of fear.

originally posted by: texasyeti
Abraxus is the name of a type of Demon. Hmm. No surprise there.

That's profane, as J. Collin de Plancy's Infernal Dictionary was the primary source of that idea. In reality that's ignorance of the deeper esoteric teachings of the Gnostics.

Abraxas has been written about by a lot of people and different types of theology exists. Like Carl Jung called Abraxas the Supreme Being combining the Yin and Yang forces of the Universe. Which is mostly true but he did make some mistakes in his terminology, for example he failed to properly define "God". He said Abraxas was transcending God and the Devil, but actually he should have said Jesus and the Devil (as that's the Yin vs Yang dichotomy). God is properly defined as the Supreme Being that combines Good vs Evil or Light vs Dark etc etc etc.

So therefore Abraxas = one of the infinite names of "God" properly speaking.

Some of the Gnostic Basilides say Abraxas is the "Great Archon" which is essentially the highest ranked 'Arch'-Angel.

As Etymology goes, Wendelin translates it by each symbol (a combo of Greek and Hebrew) and thinks it means "Father, Son, Spirit, holy; salvation from the cross", and Bellermann thinks it's actually Egyptian and means "Holy Word". There are a lot of other suggested meanings, but I think these two interpretations are just fine.

Now as to the group calling themselves this word as mentioned in the OP's article, I can't comment on what they think it means or why whomever named it as this. They'd have to answer that for themselves...

Julian Assange on Twitter: Amazing battle for dominance is playing out between the elected US govt & the IC who consider themselves to be the 'permanent government'.

a reply to: Konduit

Good link.

Glad the thread is still going, revive REVIVE!

a reply to: LuXTeN

I wonder what the game is that's going on behind closed doors?

I think there's gotta be a catch to all of this that is deeper and more complex than what most people think.

The onion has many layers and we are only seeing the surface. And appearances are usually deceiving so something has gotta be up and we don't even see it yet.

Was that a good speculative post to help revive things? Maybe I'll speculate more in a bit and add some context that'll get people to put their thinking caps on...

Always remember, deception and misdirection comes first.
Prior to this week's events the list of suspected leakers in the intel community was well over 1,000 people.
Now, after Flynn 2.0, it is less than 100.
So, yes there was a covert OP in progress, and it was outstanding in nature.

Put a little cheese out and all the rats run over each other trying to get it first.

I'm beginning to think that a whole lot of people have sorely underestimated this " Art of the Deal " guy by a large amount.
I just wish " "Nick Nack " (James Jesus Angleton ) was around to see it.



Buck

a reply to: muzzleflash

Yup a good revive there

a reply to: flatbush71

Covert indeed!