Lydos an NGO in Antarctica.

The use of an NGO in Antarctica bypasses the International treaty on the frozen Continent . Here is a Video which tells us what Lydos does with regards to its core business. Then we might be able to work out what's going on down there. Its an offshoot of Lockheed martin. We are either looking at a secret space program a getaway for the elite, or it might be something like a flash frozen civilisation. If the later I would expect a few anthropologists to end up going down there. www.youtube.com...

Got anything besides the Youtube link on this? I usually like your posts, but a Youtube vid doesn't always cut it...
S&F anyway.

a reply to: anonentity

I once read that many NGO''s are mere fronts for the CIA and other similar agencies. 10 to 1 says they are in this role in Antarctica.

This is all a little odd for them to be there as apparently there was big gathering in Antarctica very recently by the super elite. Apparently also one of the ex astronauts tweeted the message "this is pure evil" or something similar.

Funnily enough it seems strange things have been seen in Antarctica. In video I saw 3-4 years ago it showed what seemed to twin suns down there.

Then there is the story of Admiral Byrd who went there some years after the war on an unspecified mission with a fleet of military ships including a carrier. He expected to be away for 6-9 months but returned within 3 months with half of his fleet missing and third of his men missing saying he was out gunned by weapons and 'flying machines' that were vastly superior to his own and so he had no option to return home.

a reply to: Azureblue

Cool story..

Why not get a job with them?

www.leidos.com...

And yes, it's Leidos not Lydos.

a reply to: Chadwickus

seems theres a few of us here from wa but i knew a bloke who worked down there and he reckoned it was too cold to stay there.

This YouTube video is a lesson in ignorance being painted as fact. The commentator is factually wrong on a number of points. Just because he does not understand the science, does not mean the science is wrong. Just because he does not understand the Antarctic Treaty System, does not mean it is being abused.

Can anyone support any evidence of the militarisation of Antarctica?

originally posted by: Azureblue
a reply to: anonentity



Then there is the story of Admiral Byrd who went there some years after the war on an unspecified mission with a fleet of military ships including a carrier. He expected to be away for 6-9 months but returned within 3 months with half of his fleet missing and third of his men missing saying he was out gunned by weapons and 'flying machines' that were vastly superior to his own and so he had no option to return home.

What? I have read a bit about Admiral Byrd including his interviews when he returned from his last trip to Antarctica.
Never have I read anything about losing half his fleet or flying machines, although flat earthers seem to think he found the edge of the dome down there. That addition sounds crazy.

originally posted by: KungfuStu

originally posted by: Azureblue
a reply to: anonentity



Then there is the story of Admiral Byrd who went there some years after the war on an unspecified mission with a fleet of military ships including a carrier. He expected to be away for 6-9 months but returned within 3 months with half of his fleet missing and third of his men missing saying he was out gunned by weapons and 'flying machines' that were vastly superior to his own and so he had no option to return home.

What? I have read a bit about Admiral Byrd including his interviews when he returned from his last trip to Antarctica.
Never have I read anything about losing half his fleet or flying machines, although flat earthers seem to think he found the edge of the dome down there.

That addition sounds crazy.

You may be thinking of 2 different expeditions. Operation Highjump was the 1946 mission to the south pole post WWII that went awry. You won't find details of what really happened in mainstream history books.
20 years prior to that was his 1926 flight to the north pole. This flight was the one his diary was based on, which also discussed inner earth.

There's something going on in Antarctica I must say.

a reply to: paraphi


Its a non militarised zone. If soldiers are there all Treaty members must agree. But If they are in a non government organisation , like an NGO they don't.

a reply to: boozo

Hmm almost certainly there is.

It'sa shame us average Joe's can't get down there to see, huh?

a reply to: Chadwickus


Thanks for that, any idea what it stands for?

originally posted by: AgarthaSeed

originally posted by: KungfuStu

originally posted by: Azureblue
a reply to: anonentity



Then there is the story of Admiral Byrd who went there some years after the war on an unspecified mission with a fleet of military ships including a carrier. He expected to be away for 6-9 months but returned within 3 months with half of his fleet missing and third of his men missing saying he was out gunned by weapons and 'flying machines' that were vastly superior to his own and so he had no option to return home.

What? I have read a bit about Admiral Byrd including his interviews when he returned from his last trip to Antarctica.
Never have I read anything about losing half his fleet or flying machines, although flat earthers seem to think he found the edge of the dome down there.

That addition sounds crazy.

You may be thinking of 2 different expeditions. Operation Highjump was the 1946 mission to the south pole post WWII that went awry. You won't find details of what really happened in mainstream history books.
20 years prior to that was his 1926 flight to the north pole. This flight was the one his diary was based on, which also discussed inner earth.

I was talking about his expeditions to Antarctica and have never seen it claimed in relation to operation high jump he lost half his fleet. I am skeptical but it sounds interesting so I will have a look at what I can find. Thanks

a reply to: Chadwickus

Well, I hope they're not messing with The Covenant.

Shouldn't mess with the Bear Slayer.

a reply to: boozo


It might be something to do with the lines of magnetic force, getting compressed at the magnetic pole, if I was to bet that a time space vortex actually existed it would be the most probable place.

a reply to: Illumimasontruth



This might have a bit more , it points to ancient settlements kauilapele.wordpress.com...

I'm in Antarctica right now, been here for 9 months, and I'll be staying another 5 months. The only big thing I see going on down here is science. That's it. People down here just doing science stuff. Could there be hidden agendas going on? If so, they keep it well hidden from me. I'm stationed in McMurdo Station, one of 3 stations the USA has down here. I've got to do some cool stuff, like drilling 4 ft diameter holes out on the sea ice for scientists, and divers. If you really want to see what's going on down here, why not apply for a job, come down and check it out.

Just to stir the pot, a coworker down here told me an interesting story about a piece of equipment that broke down. Aliens may have been the cause. I've been told other stories of strange orbs moving around in the sky. As for myself, the auroras are something to see, but I haven't seen anything that would resemble anything alien. I'll be here working throughout the winter, and during the winter months, you have 4 months of total darkness. I'll keep my eyes open and report anything strange.

Pladuim

a reply to: Pladuim


Hey thanks for your post, I suppose the staff get changed quite regularly , so any folk tales wouldn't have much time to develop. That place is really vast, but have you any idea what Leidos is doing down there?

originally posted by: anonentity
Its a non militarised zone. If soldiers are there all Treaty members must agree. But If they are in a non government organisation , like an NGO they don't.

1. Are Leidos an NGO. They seem to be company contracted by the US for support and logistics. Leidos
2. On the Antarctic Treaty... Antarctic Treaty

The Antarctic Treaty provides that “Antarctica shall be used for peaceful purposes only” (Art. I). To this end it prohibits “any measures of a military nature” but does “not prevent the use of military personnel or equipment for scientific research or for any other peaceful purpose”.

originally posted by: Azureblue
but returned within 3 months with half of his fleet missing

Please name the ships that you claim "went missing"

saying he was out gunned by weapons and 'flying machines' that were vastly superior to his own and so he had no option to return home.

Your source for that claim is what?