Insane Feminists falsely accusing men of sexual assault (video compilation)

I wouls submit that these videos are examples of the same mindset that allowed for Rolling Stone to publish that completely fake VU rape story that they got their butts sued off over.

The girl made up the whole story, the reporter did not verify it at all and the magazine ran with it.

In court, when confronted with the truth of the falsehood, the reporter STILL defended her story saying that she KNEW that her story, while it may have been false in its specifics, was still indicative of what she simple KNEW went on in dozens of frats all across the nation. So she justified it by saying that if she wasn't documenting an actual truth, she was still telling the greater truth if not directly documenting it this time in this case.

These videos are the same thing.

Maybe it's not happening to them in this specific instance, but they are justified because they KNOW that mailmen stalk innocnet women to prey on them. They KNOW that this or that is victimizing some poor woman somewhere else who just isn't brave enough to stand up for herself like they will stand up for her now!

I would say #4 aint been laid in about 28 years. Mailman lady ain't never been laid...the rest just crazy arse bitches.

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: ArdentAngel

Feminism is about being afforded EQUAL rights.

Not in today's USA, especially since all women already have equal rights. Now its about making women superior to men, and trying to force men to bow into submission. if women wanted such equality, why was there such backlash against women mandatory registering for selective service last year?? Does not sound equal to me at all, sounds more like today's alleged Feminists simply want to do whatever possible to make men feel #ty, criminal, and have double standards.

But the ambassadors of your gender are also not the best and the brightest, the ones going out socialising like crazy, those with often changing groups and partners, and million "friends" who you silently suspect are after something you have. It's a scary world for a lady, we're not used to this new freedom, think about the 50's. Not so long ago I can still remember...

You guys are different and always had much more than we women did. That's changed and we might not send our best and brightest either. So if a sane person enters this "dating market" it looks like they're all loosers, smooching for a living from both perspectives.
Depending what glasses you wear and they actually come in many shades. If you start thinking about your fellow human beings as humans. Simply humans.
Sorry our best and brightest hide in the shadows. With witch I want to emphasise: Guys are terrorfying dicks a lot. Not all of you, not your best and brightest I am sure, but those who are hooked on sex.
Sex is highly addictive, instant reward trigger. Like nicotine, chocolate, coffee, alcohol, low level entry stuff.
But getting away from any of these is hard. Just there sex probably ranks with mean psycho active drugs, the body doesn't do much if you take it away like with heroine, but you long for the shot. Benzos, painkillers, weed, certain mushrooms, cacti, often herbal products actually, I believe that is because it is natural, that kind of longing.

Sorry got carried away, in a nutshell "on the market" there are a lot of fakes.

Yes I'm aware this is not a kind or PC thing to say but....
Is there some correlation between physical ugliness and mental ugliness ?
Maybe it's a case of cause and effect, because never have I ever seen even one slightly attractive "screaming meemie Feminist".....OR is it a case of purposeful "uglying up" as means of protest.

a reply to: SaloonSal

Maybe both and many different relations of experience. Why do the needy guys always at least take their shirts of in gatherings?
Do they think it makes them attractive? Or just the rush of being in the centre of attention?

It would be interesting to do a study of how many of the over the top crazed version feminists were abused and rejected by males somewhere along the way

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

So in other words, "feminist" is just a label you sling around at people you don't agree with. Got it.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

So in other words, "feminist" is just a label you sling around at people you don't agree with. Got it.

I would have expected original content in this thread from the likes of you.

Did you watch the video?

What in the video could be extrapolated into trying to 'label' me with 'that'?

Your words dont even make any sense.

Oh, okay, my 'if you ' thing I wrote: same story. How does that imply that people I dont agree with are feminists? My point with that, with all of this is women who act completely insane + overly agitated + EXTREMELY hypersensitive about notion of 'rape' and the like (especially when also found hurling all the usual feminist / SJW terminologies) are probably a feminist. What could that possibly have to do with the endless things I do or do ont agree with, etc????????

originally posted by: WilsonWilson
So all women who do bad things or things you don't agree with are feminist?

I think for the OPer most women are probably feminists.

a reply to: redhorse

Okay people, who here would actually directly deny that those chicks are these nu school SJW feminists (opposed to this passive aggressive kind of tactic like you did there that keeps happening in here)????

a reply to: redhorse

I'm a feminist and I'm male, I support equal rights for females.
what the # those females in the OP were I can only imagine....nuts?

a reply to: grainofsand

I fixed it, I should have specified these "sjw style feminists"


So many people in here acting like they've never heard of todays feminists being these bastions of SJW meltdown mentality has me flabbergasted. You might go on youtube and punch in things like 'feminist cringe' and such. There has to be millions of the kinds of videos in there now.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

In the first segment, the woman says that she's a "free inhabitant" which is what? A soveriegn citizen? It didn't seem to have anything to do with feminism at all but rather a delusional fringe-right movement.

The second and third "case studies" sounded like the same paranoid person just being paranoid. You are aware that there are people in the world who are mentally ill — people who believe that they are being 'gang stalked' and such — and some of them even have cell phones?

I'm failing to make the connection to feminism you're talking about.

originally posted by: WilsonWilson
I'm a feminist and never accused any policemen or postmen of anything, typical menanist craziness. (see what I did there)

Masculist.. maleaninist..

All sounds a bit absurd.

a reply to: theantediluvian

On YT, videos like the last couple of clips are thrown together as evidence of SJW triggerings or feminazi's gone crazy.

First time I've seen the first clip thrown in there as evidence of either of those, though.

The others? I seen't it.

a reply to: theantediluvian

And yet in all of your deduction you've still failed to make your opening statement make a lick of sense.

And could it be possible for a sjw feminist nutter to also be a sovereign citizen?

Could it be that SJW's tend to fit the paranoid profile? The word Patriarchy, and the phrase "Alt Right", and add to them "deplorables" all comes to mind.

Pretty sure videos 2 and 3 are the same person.

The 4th video, she is 100% a feminazi.

www.youtube.com...

a reply to: ALSGoes4th

I'm more drawn towards paranoid mental health issues.

a reply to: grainofsand

Maybe the others but definitely not the 4th video.

She is cold, calculated and a political shark.

Actually, she is nuts too xD

ALS

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

“He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And if you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss also gazes into you.” - Friedrich Nietzsche


I don't know how he recognized it, but he was spot on.