It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jappee
a reply to: goou111
So they know who he is, but released the video to demonstrate his method?
I see a complete failure in security than anything else. One man doing his job where he should be at the back of the open van, would have prevented the suspect from even trying this at all.
ETA; This guy didn't even threaten or endanger anyone in the process.
originally posted by: goou111
originally posted by: jappee
a reply to: goou111
So they know who he is, but released the video to demonstrate his method?
I see a complete failure in security than anything else. One man doing his job where he should be at the back of the open van, would have prevented the suspect from even trying this at all.
ETA; This guy didn't even threaten or endanger anyone in the process.
No they released the video to get him identified. And I bet as soo n as the video went on the local news hw was identified within 20 minutes.
And I saw this video earlier today on my 5 oclock news so they have had the video out for a while.
originally posted by: onehuman
Just curious here, but on a legal side, how much trouble can he really be in? Basically all he did was walk up to a Open van and help himself. No one was hurt. Not like he Broke in. No locks were broken.
I mean even a unlocked house changes the charges on a burglary. Can't know for sure, but he may have even been unarmed. So it isn't a armed robbery either.
I think a lawyer would have a field day with this.
originally posted by: spirit_horse
originally posted by: onehuman
Just curious here, but on a legal side, how much trouble can he really be in? Basically all he did was walk up to a Open van and help himself. No one was hurt. Not like he Broke in. No locks were broken.
I mean even a unlocked house changes the charges on a burglary. Can't know for sure, but he may have even been unarmed. So it isn't a armed robbery either.
I think a lawyer would have a field day with this.
It would probably be a burglary to a conveyance. He knew the property was not his and took it from an armored vehicle. It wouldn't be robbery.
originally posted by: onehuman
Just curious here, but on a legal side, how much trouble can he really be in? Basically all he did was walk up to a Open van and help himself. No one was hurt. Not like he Broke in. No locks were broken.
I mean even a unlocked house changes the charges on a burglary. Can't know for sure, but he may have even been unarmed. So it isn't a armed robbery either.
I think a lawyer would have a field day with this.
originally posted by: jappee
True. It's closer to pick-pocketing someone of their wallet.
Theft as Grand Larceny in the First Degree. If the value of the property or services stolen exceeds one million dollars, the offense is grand larceny in the first degree, a class B felony. (N.Y. Penal Law § 155.42.) Source
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: jappee
True. It's closer to pick-pocketing someone of their wallet.
It is considered Grand Larceny in the First Degree (felony theft) in New York due to it being over $1,000,000 and is punishable by up to 25 years in prison.
Theft as Grand Larceny in the First Degree. If the value of the property or services stolen exceeds one million dollars, the offense is grand larceny in the first degree, a class B felony. (N.Y. Penal Law § 155.42.) [url=http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/crime-penalties/petty-theft-new-york-penalties-defense#]Source[/url