Putin ally tells Americans: vote Trump or face nuclear war

A reply to: RedMenace16

Dude go off yourself, you dont know a dam thing about me. Your simply deflecting the fact that tour too much of a chump to stop the machine that had taken hold of a once great nation.

My parents almost died in the attack of the pentagon. Go to hell dude.

originally posted by: WilburnRoach
a reply to: Profusion

There is one candidate that wonders why we can't use nuclear weapons, one candidate that thinks more nations should have nuclear weapons and one candidate that has stated he loves war.

It's very simple.

Hillary is a globalist. Putin is not.

The globalists need both America to be cowed and Russia to be cowed. Hillary will do what her masters bid. That means America must be broken and so must Russia. In order to bring in a world globalist system, there must be world-wide catastrophe.

The globalist powers think they can manage this the same way that the US government PTB thought they could manage the collapse of private health care in such a way that most of us would forget they really brought it down with Obamacare instead of it breaking on its own.

They will likely create a clusterf***, but I could very easily see a nuclear war with Russia. It might be limited, but it will still be devastating enough that they can usher in their global system to "save" us from the mess they created.

a reply to: RedMenace16

How are you going to enforce that law in foreign countries? US National law does not apply in foreign states, as much as the NSA seems to think it does.

I thought Americans believed in freedom of speech anyway? Regardless calling for nuclear war against America does not constitute terrorism.

Warmongering maybe, not terrorism.

I tell you this id rather support any militia out there if they had the intestinal fortitude to unite and confront the problem that plagues this country today. Guess what? No one has the balls to do it yet? What does anyone suggest? Anything? You leave it up to some other country to decide we wouldnt be alive right now.

test

Bush II made Russia great again with endless war. They want Trump to make Russia even more great.

He is the only candidate brought up defending Saudi and going after Iran. Russia wants to sell more arms to Iran, and be the main supplier of oil ..

I'm sure Putin has the best interest of America at heart...
Even though the Russian economy sucks right now, Putin wants America to have a stronger economy and be a greater nation than Russia, that is why he is advising that Americans vote Trump. He wants Trump to make all these great deals so that mother Russia's currency will be worth less and less than the US Dollar..

/sarcasm off

a reply to: AudioOne

I remember when Obama was up for election, all the foreign endorsements were something good and not a bad thing.

originally posted by: TheKnightofDoom
a reply to: 4N0M4LY

Erm you do know the rest of the world will be dragged into it don't you?.
If the US and Russia want to slug it out let them but we know it will get very very messy and the chance would be high that after it we will be living in mad max times.

a reply to: Profusion


This is similar to the theory I posted here on ATS last night.


1. Russia takes America to the brink of war.

2. Donald Trump visits Russia.. war averted... Trump returns a hero.

3. Election is the next week... Trump wins by huge landslide.

a reply to: carewemust

Or door #2

Hillary is made POTUS

No fly zone over Syria

A Russian plain is downed

Then it's on like donkey Kong.

IMHO I prefer your scenario a hole lot better.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: AudioOne

I remember when Obama was up for election, all the foreign endorsements were something good and not a bad thing.

Yes, ALL the foreign endorsements were a good thing. Emphasis on ALL meaning many many leaders of democratic countries with good economies, not the corrupt dictator of one country... (correction, two dictators, forgot about North Korea.)

Where are all his other endorsements, like maybe from the actual free world?

I'm just gonna leave this here:

originally posted by: AudioOne

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: AudioOne

I remember when Obama was up for election, all the foreign endorsements were something good and not a bad thing.

Yes, ALL the foreign endorsements were a good thing. Emphasis on ALL meaning many many leaders of democratic countries with good economies, not the corrupt dictator of one country... (correction, two dictators, forgot about North Korea.)

Where are all his other endorsements, like maybe from the actual free world?

My point was the Obama was horrible, so who really cares what the foreign leaders think?

a reply to: Profusion

Zhirinovsky is not a credible source for learning anything about Russian policies, but he does have some good recipes for Russian cooking.

That said, Clinton's proposed no-fly zone in Syria would lead to a direct confrontation with Russia.

a reply to: hillbilly4rent

I like my version better too, LOL.

a reply to: hillbilly4rent

But NATO member Turkey shot down a Russian plane last year and it didn't trigger WW3. It would take a lot more than that to trigger an actual war between the US/NATO & Russia. At most, I'd see it escalating the war in Syria, with Russia possibly retaliating against Europe with their energy deals (though I doubt this too). I think virtually nothing short of Russia freezing all Western assets in its territory would trigger WW3. Here's a good article from 2014 that's just about the extensive Western oil company investments in Russia.
www.nytimes.com...

As for the OP, it figures that it was Vladimir Zhirinovsky. That dude's been incredibly loud, flamboyant, and belligerent against us for more than a decade. There are a lot of youtube videos of his exploits & I remember watching one a long time ago where he was talking about some of Russia's secret weapons. If I'm not mistaken, he was claiming Russia had some weapons that could either slow or change the rotation of the Earth (note: I'm not bored enough to go look for the clip, though). Ironically, I thought he was dead by now. Hmmm... Mandela effect? (jk)

I have five kids, so you can shut your mouth.

Whoever said bring it on the nukes.

a reply to: Tempter

Why do having kids give you the right to tell people to shut up? Who are you speaking to? I don't get your post please explain .



Ah I get it now carry on yeah anyone who welcomes this is a douche.

a reply to: corblimeyguvnor

What do you think the last forty or fifty years of pointless scuffles in dusty places have been about?

Russia and America, more precisely Russia and the West in general, have been at one kind of war or another since the end of the Second World War. There was the Cold War, which never ACTUALLY ended, there has been the business wars, and more recently more proxy war than you can shake a foreign affairs policy document at.

The whole lot can get in the bloody sea as far as I am concerned.