Friendly reminder: Hillary Clinton still hasn't had a open press conference.

a reply to: BO XIAN

Oh well if you're one for conspiracies ... just no.

a reply to: xuenchen

What question would you ask?

a reply to: Deny Arrogance

So what are you saying? They can't ask unbiased questions ? Yeah there's that trump message.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Blindness to reality

does not alter the reality.

Not my fault you have evidently not studied the problem since 1965

a reply to: BO XIAN

Go say that in front of the mirror.
Don't make this about me. Mods don't like that.

Still no open press conference and I quote:


"Friday's event was carefully controlled, with Clinton taking just seven questions from preselected journalists."


Status quo

The way it's looking, she doesn't have to say anything. She'll win by default because of the constant screw ups from the Trump campaign.The smartest strategy for her might be to simply sit back & let Trump keep alienating people.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: DBCowboy

And don't call me a liar Cowboy.

If you're going to be defending and supporting Hillary, you might want to get used to the term.

a reply to: RickinVa

Well , she Held one today , Only No Crackers Allowed .

a reply to: enlightenedservant

Do you think they are screw-ups? I think you mean the candidate and his team don't know what they're doing. I have no idea if you're correct, but it seems amazing for someone to gather such resources and suddenly have none.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Trump is just not as smart or well informed of world affairs as Hillary is.

Under her dominion nations collapse, rightful leaders are murdered... and she laughs.

Thanks, I'll take the successful business man over the treacherous manipulator any day.

ABSOLUTELY INDEED.

Bears repeating . . . if you can bear the association. LOL. . . . of us agreeing too much, still. Shocking.

originally posted by: intrptr

Under her dominion nations collapse, rightful leaders are murdered... and she laughs.

Thanks, I'll take the successful business man over the treacherous manipulator any day.

Which part of frightful Hitlarian, Stalinistic, Marxist, Pol Pot, Fosterizing, Vengeful, Rage-a-holic, supremely arrogant, tyrant . . . do folks fail to get?

This is one miserable piece of human garbage power-grasping for all she can scratch at.

She takes no prisoners.

She tolerates no questioners.

Part of me, looking at her character and personality, thinks that if she gets very full sway at all, she'll make Hitler look like a choir boy on Vallium.

originally posted by: oriondc
a reply to: enlightenedservant

Do you think they are screw-ups? I think you mean the candidate and his team don't know what they're doing. I have no idea if you're correct, but it seems amazing for someone to gather such resources and suddenly have none.

I honestly don't know anymore. I said in another thread that I'm having a hard time accepting that a billionaire's presidential campaign can be so incompetent. Either way, if he were my opponent, I'd just stay silent and let him keep sticking his foot in his mouth. No need to redirect the media's attention onto myself.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Actually, I think the screechy pants suit's IQ is farrrrrrrrrrrrrrr overrated.

Her blind spots are as broad as the White Cliffs of Dover.

Her understanding can't crawl out from under her massively blinding narcissism and ruthlessness.

Her sensitivity is possibly a nanometer thick and maybe a square nanometer in breadth and about few things is she very constructively sensitive at all.

She is VERY sensitive about being looked in the eyes or spoken to on their own initiative--even with merely "Good Morning" by any "little people" who dare to be within 50 feet of her.

I'm skeptical anyone could bioengineer a worse candidate or a worse human creature on the island with Dr Moreau.

a reply to: BO XIAN

Hitler, Stalin, Marx, and Pol Pot? Really? You really think Hillary will kill off millions of her own citizens the same way Stalin and Pol Pot did? You really think she'll push some crap like the "Hunger Plan" or "Living Space", or target and commit genocide against minority groups (like the Romani) and the members of an Abrahamic religion like Hitler did? From where I'm standing, Trump looks more likely to try to kill off an entire Abrahamic religion (Muslims) than Hillary, and I don't even like Hillary.

And Marx was just a philosopher. He believed societies would rightfully transition from feudalism to capitalism, then from capitalism to socialism, then from socialism to communism. Hillary, on the other hand, is a diehard capitalist who aggressively backs Wall Street and the world's wealthy. She's far more likely to push America from capitalism to feudalism than to push it to communism, which is the opposite of Marxism.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

I fiercely disagree.

YES.

I do believe that with the backing of the oligarchy she'd LOVE to reduce the population of the planet as much as she could get away with.

Globalists are Marxists in a lot of respects. She was well trained and conditioned with such values.

She is ON BOARD with the oligarchy's depopulation goals.

She's also a practicing witch sucking up to all the suffering, tyranny, death memes she can get away with.

Trump is a gentle pussy cat by comparison.

His most fierce stuff is his blow hard rhetoric. And, maybe some of his harsher business decisions.

The Clinton death pile is just a HINT . . . a FAINT HINT

of the character and values of the screechy one.

I hope and pray that she is not the one who ends up in the slot when the oligarchy pulls the plug on history and our culture as we have known it. She would delight in being ordered to be a massively overt destroyer.

She has extreme ruthlessness and vengeance in her blood, in her DNA.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

The Clintons have been closet Marxists for at least 40 years. Research California Communist Party meetings they attended and the comments about them by some of the Party faithful.

originally posted by: enlightenedservant
The way it's looking, she doesn't have to say anything. She'll win by default because of the constant screw ups from the Trump campaign.The smartest strategy for her might be to simply sit back & let Trump keep alienating people.

Thats the press more than anything. Hillary says things all the time that alienate just gets blacked out of fancied up.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: enlightenedservant

The Clintons have been closet Marxists for at least 40 years. Research California Communist Party meetings they attended and the comments about them by some of the Party faithful.

Dude, I'm an actual socialist. And depending on the setting, I agree with some aspects of communism (in theory not in practice). Hillary's economic and social plans have absolutely nothing to do with Marxism. She's a literal representation of what his theories oppose rather than what his theories support.

originally posted by: Logarock

originally posted by: enlightenedservant
The way it's looking, she doesn't have to say anything. She'll win by default because of the constant screw ups from the Trump campaign.The smartest strategy for her might be to simply sit back & let Trump keep alienating people.

Thats the press more than anything. Hillary says things all the time that alienate just gets blacked out of fancied up.

Isn't the whole point of this thread to point out how she refuses to say things at all and speaks publicly as little as possible? So what is she saying "all the time" that you're referring to?