Pence: 'Name Calling' Has No Place in Politics

a reply to: DBCowboy

When you're sleeping with whores, and Clinton is one, then you really can't consider yourself innocent.

And, by your analogy, Trump IS sleeping with whores!

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: DBCowboy

When you're sleeping with whores, and Clinton is one, then you really can't consider yourself innocent.

And, by your analogy, Trump IS sleeping with whores!

Yes.

I thought I made that clear.

Trump sleeps with whores.
Hillary is a whore.

Is that better?

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: TheAmazingYeti

Face it, they all do it, they all act like 10 year olds on the playground now. There is no decorum, no intelligent debate no sticking to facts. Might as well have clowns running for all offices in all parts of government large and small.

Someone said clowns?

a reply to: DBCowboy

Trump sleeps with whores. Hillary is a whore. Is that better?

I don't know? Is Donald sleeping with Hillary? Does the one who sleeps with whores have the moral high ground?

Isn't Donald Trump Putin's whore? I mean, he's already pushing Putin's agenda with his stance on NATO and all.

What goes around, comes around. Sleep with dogs, and you get fleas! And so and so forth.....

a reply to: windword

Putin isn't running for election in America Only his whore-proxy, Clinton is.

And now you want to add morality to US politics?

hahahahahahahahaha

Since when?

Russia invaded Georgia in 2008.
Hillary gave Russia a "reset" button in 2009.

I'd call Hillary the bigger whore.

Trump just uses whores.

Has anyone seen the sign they produced in Nebraska and her campaign released? Speaking of whores ...

a reply to: DBCowboy

Putin isn't running for election in America Only his whore-proxy, Clinton is.

Oh no man! You've got that wrong! Trump is Putin's "whore-proxy".

a reply to: DBCowboy

WTH are you talking about? Hillary wasn't the president in 2008-9. She served at the appointment of the Oval Office.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: DBCowboy

WTH are you talking about? Hillary wasn't the president in 2008-9. She served at the appointment of the Oval Office.

Yeah, Hillary was just Sec of State. Foreign policy was her area.

Face it, she's a whore. Russia probably ponied up some cash for the Clinton Foundation and all she probably said was, "No kissing on the mouth".

a reply to: DBCowboy

Yeah, Hillary was just Sec of State. Foreign policy was her area.

The Secretary of State doesn't make foreign policy. The Secretary advises and takes advice.

The Secretary of State, appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, is the President's chief foreign affairs adviser. The Secretary carries out the President's foreign policies through the State Department and the Foreign Service of the United States.

You give this woman way too much credit.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: DBCowboy

WTH are you talking about? Hillary wasn't the president in 2008-9. She served at the appointment of the Oval Office.

Facts don't matter to many anymore on ATS.

I can't stand Hillary, but to say she's Putin's "proxy whore," is absolutely ridiculous.

What is there to this claim - where's the proof? It doesn't matter - it just gets whitewashed with the hollow chants and speeches of Hope & Change 2.0 that we unfortunately have to deal with on a daily basis.

People are so (rightfully) upset at the current administration that they desperately look at any other option, and many are so blinded by partisan trolling that they can't see past their respective colors - and thus, divide. And rather than voting for ideals, principles, platforms, rationality - people are voting a vote "against," another candidate rather than "for," their own - while, again, completely ignoring alternatives.

The notion of, "this time, it'll be different!," because a different establishment candidate says so hasn't done much and is recycled and rehashed - and I swear the American people suffer from amnesia because every four years they seem to forget.

I blame # like Twitter (and it's why Donald loves it). Hardly anyone will actually bother reading my post, and it's hardly that long, because the reading comprehension in this nation is atrocious and Americans need their "facts," and "news," in one to two sentences rather than elaborating and commenting on discussions.

To think that Donald is any different than Hillary is delusional. Donald wants to put former Sachs banker Steve Mnuchin as head as the U.S. Treasure Secretary.

So yeah - he's a whore just like Hillary. Keep on telling yourself he represent the working American. You people sound like Obama supporters in 2008.

a reply to: windword

So Obama was the pimp for the Clinton whore.

Russia was just the customer.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Russia was just the customer.

Russia owns Trump, bought and paid for.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: windword

So Obama was the pimp for the Clinton whore.

Russia was just the customer.

Trump has been Russia's whore since the 80's. It's no shock that Trump praises Putin cause ho's love their sugar daddy.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

But a woman, actually political whore,

What does that make the Donald, who brags about how he's lined politicians' pockets to get what he wants? It takes two to make a "whore".

I don't disagree, however the Donald would be purchasing favours that ultimately keep people employed, sure he'd make money as well. Hillary however would be taking bribes to enrich herself only, there are not any employees she shares with. If there were she wouldn't have more than 2 billion in the faux charity foundation that she probably uses as her personal piggyback for paying off other politicians. The truth is all going to come out ;-) Won't be too much longer now...

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: bobs_uruncle

I don't disagree, however the Donald would be purchasing favours that ultimately keep people employed, sure he'd make money as well. Hillary however would be taking bribes to enrich herself only.....

That's pretty biased. It's not like Hillary Clinton hasn't spearheaded some really good community/social projects in her public service career. What has the Donald spearheaded, in the way of positive social projects?

And besides, Donald Trump has already announced, on several occasions that he's bribed politicians, lined their pockets, to get what he wants, for his personal self interest. Just because he says he's not in this for personal gain doesn't make it true.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

I don't disagree, however the Donald would be purchasing favours that ultimately keep people employed, sure he'd make money as well. Hillary however would be taking bribes to enrich herself only.....

That's pretty biased. It's not like Hillary Clinton hasn't spearheaded some really good community/social projects in her public service career. What has the Donald spearheaded, in the way of positive social projects?

And besides, Donald Trump has already announced, on several occasions that he's bribed politicians, lined their pockets, to get what he wants, for his personal self interest. Just because he says he's not in this for personal gain doesn't make it true.

Trump hasn't been in politics so he really hasn't had the opportunity Clinton has to date wasted. What are those great community programs, other than taking money from foreign governments and warlords to sell them arms or keep them off the terrorists lists? The news just popped up in the last couple of days about boko harem. The criminal hits just keep cummin!

Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: TheAmazingYeti
Why is the Republican VP complaining about the democrats?

Because that's his job? Because Trump is busy staying on-track with burying Hillary in her history?
I don't know. But, it sounds good to me.

How much will the female electorate take of bashing Clinton until they see it as political rape?

Alienate the ladies at your own peril Donald!!

Even Conservative women won't put up with that BS for very long.

We can take it.

~Not an emotional snowflake~

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: olaru12
How much will the female electorate take of bashing Clinton until they see it as political rape?

They'll have to take it as long as it's the truth. If they can't deny their own ignorance, who wants them tainting the vote 'for' Trump.

Who cares about "Truth" in a political campaign? Perception is the operating system.

Ever heard of the "maternal instinct" Women don't like bullies....that's a guy thing.

Without women and minorities...Trump is DOA! And it's his own fault.

I am a woman/mother/grandmother who has "maternal instinct" and I have MANY friends/family/co-workers who are woman/mothers with the same "maternal instincts" we are all against Hillary! We find her to be a YUGE LIAR and narcissistic criminal. I could go on with the adjectives but I won't. We are all registered to vote.