Hillary kept Boko Haram off of Terrorist designation for cash

originally posted by: derfreebie

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: 727Sky
His speech fees doubled and tripled when she became SOS.

Not to mention her speeches to wall street bankers.

If Trump uses even a quarter of the already admitted-to
cannon fodder available during the two debates-- it'll make
how Kennedy stomped Nixon in 1960 look like like a waltz.

The pantsuit might be teflon but the mud's mounting up
to roll over her like a wet California spring now. Glad I'm not her.

The MSM asks the questions. Don't expect Trump to get a fair chance.

Remember Mitt?

Shes our Merkel. God help us .

Well given all the conspiracy theorists wild imagination's, at least when she becomes president we'll all be right!

I mean....what's the worst that could happen? Right?!

originally posted by: ColCurious
a reply to: Gin

S&F!
Piece by piece the truth comes to light...

Not the first time... nor will it be the last time that the U.S. is protecting radical islamists.

Same thing happened with groups like Jaysh al-Islam and Ahrar al-Sham.
Although they openly state their goal to create an Islamic state under Sharia law, the U.S. vehemently blocks them from being designated as a terrorist organization on the UN-list!

Look it up! Wake up Americans... you are the bad guys here!!

This is all true,

Reason is called "The War Machine"
It is a known fact that throughout history the "ruling elite" or "money men" have funded both sides of the wars, If you own a multi trillion dollar arms making company the last thing on earth you want is PEACE

Peace will never happen as long as our political system is controlled by money and not people...but that's democracy for you

Generally politicians just do as they are told, they sell their souls essentially, if not you will probably have half your brain blown out in an open top car

I'm in the UK and we have our own problems but not on the scale of the USA, Trump and Clinton are two sides of the same coin and it don't really matter which side it drops in a toss up...I really feel for America and the rest of the world for the next few years with either of these corporate monkeys running things... same old same old I guess

IN reply to BS Shinder above (sp?)

Yea they both could be Fascists with evil deeds in their future. So far this Libertarian sees the Clinton's work as the one to be most concerned with. I may vote Trump, but I am a Libertarian Johnson guy. However, their is no way in hell that I could see such evil get a pass in my lifetime when it comes to Hillary for Pres and what to do with my vote and influence with my friends. This corruption is in dire need of a fair trial.

ETA: Oh, I crossed over for Cruz in the primary and can't blame him for not selling his wife out and endorsing the Donald. He had the best chance to be a conservative in office and he is not perfect. Canadian or not, he is a great Constitutional scholar.

a reply to: Gin

If the US gubment denies the terrorists are in Nigera, its because they are behind it.

Their job isn't done yet. They need to be preserved to justify humanitarian intervention there when the time comes.

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
Well given all the conspiracy theorists wild imagination's, at least when she becomes president we'll all be right!

I mean....what's the worst that could happen? Right?!

The problem is what is the best that could happen , seems distant and unreachable goal for the Democratic Socialist and RINO R's.

a reply to: Gin

Book Haram is but one thorn in one countries side in Africa.

The whole continent was denied unity, its own banking system, its own communication network, of by and for Africans, when Hillary was in the state Department and helped to take down Qaddafi in Libya.

Qaddafi had big plans. He was going to fund the half billion dollars for an African communications satellite the year he was killed.

He was organizing nations in Africa to have their own central bank and an African Monetary Fund; an AMF instead of the IMF. And he was going to replace the Petro dollar with the Gold Dinar for oil purchases.

Hillary's laughter when she heard he was murdered, "We came, we saw, he died", shows how delighted she was at his demise.

Good bit on how the destruction of Libya keeps the continent divided and the peoples poor.

a reply to: stosh64

I watched this last night... The depth of the Clinton's shady dealings is very worrisome. I honestly can't believe liberals have such hate for Trump that they can look past all this... I am NO Trump supporter, and I believe he is a horrible candidate, so lets get that out of the way, but Hillary is a special kind of evil. She's pathological. She's in so deep, that there's no saying what she's capable of, and the reason why she hasn't gone down, is because she's like the banks "too big too fail", where if she goes down, she likely will be taking down a bunch of high profile people with her..... It's honestly no surprise that Hillary would keep Boko Haram off for a paycheck.. not surprising at all after watching Clinton Cash..

originally posted by: moebius

Boko Haram has been designated by the USA as a terrorist organization in 2013. The kidnapping happened 2014. The Nigerian government has been against this designation.

Why exactly should Clinton be responsible? Is the secretary of state of the USA in charge of governing Nigeria?

The UN and Australia designated Boko Haram as a terrorist organization in 2014 after the kidnapping happened. Following your logic, shouldn't they be blamed for it? It happened on their watch.

Well let's see now...

In 2009 Boko Haram was responsible for the murders of 700 people
In 2010 Boko Haram killed 75 people (a slow year apparently)
In 2011 Boko Haram massacred 569 people
In 2012 Boko Haram got busy and took out another 1,650 innocent people

This represents a total not dissimilar to the death toll on 9/11...all on her watch.

The kidnappings aside...just how many people did Hillary have to see murdered by a known Al Qaeda affiliate, before she would agree that they should be designated a terrorist organization?

a reply to: 727Sky

They are now billionaires. Over $2 Billion.

It's just fun and games

You lost me at:

We also now know that the Obama administration was sitting on intelligence -- obtained as a result of the Bin Laden raid

The "Bin Laden" raid cannot be proven to be true and was most likely staged so any information allegedly obtained from that raid is also fake.

Getting tired of these subliminal red herrings that keep on trying to trick us into thinking the bun Laden raid even took place.

At least they gave him a proper Muslim burial lmao

wow i dont really care for politics that much but this really hit a nerve! hill dog would sell her soul for some cash. how can anyone still believe her, wow if she wins americans are totally screwed. see you on the other side.

originally posted by: Gin
Hillary Obstructed Boko Haram's Terror Designation as Her Donors Cashed In

An important two-part investigative series by WORLD magazine reporters Mindy Belz and J.C. Derrick provides some insight:

Belz and Derrick discovered that Hillary Clinton's obstruction of the Boko Haram designation, and the continuing chaos in northern Nigeria -- Africa's largest economy and the 10th largest oil producer in the world -- directly benefited Clinton Global Initiative donors and a close Clinton confidante who bundled campaign cash for Hillary.

No wonder USA had a zero stance against Boko Haram.

We also now know that the Obama administration was sitting on intelligence -- obtained as a result of the Bin Laden raid -- that revealed Boko Haram's direct connection to al-Qaeda and the international terror network in 2011 and 2012. In other words, Hillary's State Department was arguing that Boko Haram had no such connections, that it wasn't a transnational terror threat, even though the Obama administration -- and likely Clinton herself -- knew that was false.

On page two the article goes on about all of Hillary Clinton's donor's from Nigeria forced her to keep it off the terrorist list and how some of them also smuggle heroin into America.

Yeah, Clinton is the gift that keeps on giving, ya know? I'm no Trump fan, but I am DEFINITELY not a Clinton fan, because I actually WATCH what these politicians DO, and realized a long time ago, that the Clintons are really NEOCONS in Democrat clothing, and the proof is Hillarys PRO TPP, their pro NAFTA, their pro increasing prison time, which has destroyed millions of families...I could go on. It's only the truly brainwashed and those absolutely terrified by the truth of what our gov't has been doing to us, that can ignore all of these facts...

Heck, just do a web search on 'benghazi moriarty dia' to find out what REALLY happened in Benghazi and Libya that Hillary was doing. It ain't pretty folks, but it's true, and the Moriarty's were THERE and reported it, to the DIA, and to any media market they could find, only to be played around by the DIA, and ignored by EVERY SINGLE MAINSTREAM MEDIA OUTLET.

Just go to ahealedplanet.net to get an idea of what our gov't is up to. If you can spend 5 minutes on that site and still think all of these people are lying, I want to have what your drinking...the site may be down, because, well, certain people obviously do not want you to see what's on that website....

originally posted by: Gin
Hillary Obstructed Boko Haram's Terror Designation as Her Donors Cashed In

An important two-part investigative series by WORLD magazine reporters Mindy Belz and J.C. Derrick provides some insight:

Belz and Derrick discovered that Hillary Clinton's obstruction of the Boko Haram designation, and the continuing chaos in northern Nigeria -- Africa's largest economy and the 10th largest oil producer in the world -- directly benefited Clinton Global Initiative donors and a close Clinton confidante who bundled campaign cash for Hillary.

No wonder USA had a zero stance against Boko Haram.

We also now know that the Obama administration was sitting on intelligence -- obtained as a result of the Bin Laden raid -- that revealed Boko Haram's direct connection to al-Qaeda and the international terror network in 2011 and 2012. In other words, Hillary's State Department was arguing that Boko Haram had no such connections, that it wasn't a transnational terror threat, even though the Obama administration -- and likely Clinton herself -- knew that was false.

On page two the article goes on about all of Hillary Clinton's donor's from Nigeria forced her to keep it off the terrorist list and how some of them also smuggle heroin into America.

Yeah, Clinton is the gift that keeps on giving, ya know? I'm no Trump fan, but I am DEFINITELY not a Clinton fan, because I actually WATCH what these politicians DO, and realized a long time ago, that the Clintons are really NEOCONS in Democrat clothing, and the proof is Hillarys PRO TPP, their pro NAFTA, their pro increasing prison time, which has destroyed millions of families...I could go on. It's only the truly brainwashed and those absolutely terrified by the truth of what our gov't has been doing to us, that can ignore all of these facts...

Heck, just do a web search on 'benghazi moriarty dia' to find out what REALLY happened in Benghazi and Libya that Hillary was doing. It ain't pretty folks, but it's true, and the Moriarty's were THERE and reported it, to the DIA, and to any media market they could find, only to be played around by the DIA, and ignored by EVERY SINGLE MAINSTREAM MEDIA OUTLET.

Just go to ahealedplanet.net to get an idea of what our gov't is up to. If you can spend 5 minutes on that site and still think all of these people are lying, I want to have what your drinking...the site may be down, because, well, certain people obviously do not want you to see what's on that website....

OR it could be fact checked more deeply and the "spin" of right wing media could be left off and then you get this:

Wash. Post: “No Evidence That Clinton Played A Role Or ‘Fought’ To Keep Boko Haram Off The List” Or “That A Terrorist Designation Any Sooner Would Have Prevented” The Mass Kidnappings.

Washington Post fact-checkers Glenn Kessler and Michelle Ye Hee Lee wrote that “Christie grossly simplifie[d] a complex debate at the State Department -- which actually did not involve Clinton personally.”

The Fact Checker blog noted that State Department officials conceded they could have moved faster with Boko Haram’s designation, but that “there is no evidence that Clinton played a role” and that there is also “no evidence” that the terrorist designation “any sooner would have prevented the kidnapping of the girls.” The fact check also pointed out that the hashtag campaign “came after Clinton had left the State Department.”

From the July 19 article:

Christie grossly simplifies a complex debate at the State Department — which actually did not involve Clinton personally.

In 2014, the Fact Checker closely examined this issue, concluding that claims that Clinton was responsible for the decision betrays a misunderstanding of how the State Department works. Yes, Clinton was secretary of state in 2012. Designations of foreign terrorist groups are ultimately issued by the secretary of state. But the decision on how to handle the group was resolved before it ever reached her level, according to officials familiar with the deliberations.

State Department officials in 2012 vigorously debated how to treat Boko Haram, with the Bureau of Counterterrorism, headed then by Assistant Secretary Daniel Benjamin, leaning toward designation, and the Africa bureau, headed then by Assistant Secretary Johnnie Carson, urging caution. One big issue was that Nigeria was a government close to the United States — and Nigeria was adamantly opposed to the designation, arguing it risked entrenching Boko Haram. Nigerian officials also argued that a terrorist designation — which halts any flow of funds to the entity or people associated with it — would make it difficult for humanitarian aid to continue in the region where Boko Haram operated.

There was another, complicating issue: U.S. officials thought the Nigerian army had engaged in brutal human rights abuses in its efforts to fight Boko Haram. So a compromise was reached internally: The administration would name three leaders of Boko Haram as specially designated global terrorists while holding out the possibly of a broader designation of the entire group as a means of improving the behavior of Nigerian forces battling Boko Haram.

In any case, in 2013, the State Department formally designated Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist organization. Officials later conceded that, in retrospect, they could have moved a bit faster, but there is no evidence that Clinton played a role or “fought” to keep Boko Haram off the list. The internal debate did not rise to her level; it was handled by the deputy secretary of state.

There is no evidence that a terrorist designation any sooner would have prevented the kidnapping of the girls. As for the hashtag campaign, that came after Clinton had left the State Department. [The Washington Post, 7/19/16]

[url=http://mediamatters.org/research/2016/07/20/chris-christie-s-debunked-clinton-claim-about-boko-haram-comes-straight-right-wing-media/211754]LINK[ /url]

Facts do matter.

- AB

a reply to: AboveBoard

But Fact Checker is part of the Annenberg Foundation.

A Left Wing organization.

Hmmm.

a reply to: xuenchen

I see. So facts DON'T matter, just the leaning of who delivers them. Did you even read it or do you just want to debunk it with a one liner?

originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: xuenchen

I see. So facts DON'T matter, just the leaning of who delivers them. Did you even read it or do you just want to debunk it with a one liner?

LOL

Not easy to read a broken link.

Clever.