Facebook and Twitter Censoring in Favor of Hillary

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: Gryphon66

You're way off topic, I hope mods will react and remove your post.

Oh, wait, they do that only to those who support Trump

I've been on topic in every post. The topic is an absurd contention that social media is discriminatory. I've shown examples that dispute that claim. I've quoted sources. One doesn't have to agree with the OP to be on topic.

ATS 101

In other news, Hillary's campaign manager is trying to state that Russia is helping Trump by leaking these emails...

It comes on the heels of "changes to the Republican platform to make it more pro-Russian," Robby Mook told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union" Sunday. "I don't think it's coincidental that these emails were released on the eve of our convention here, and I think that's disturbing," he said.

CNN Link


Honestly, Hillary's camp is legit crazy and will do/say ANYTHING

originally posted by: EmmanuelGoldstein
Makes no difference does it what?

The majority of twits won't even be bothered to show up an vote.

Yes it does. A lot of people are guided in their daily lives by what they see in Facebook, and twitter. Personally I only use Facebook to keep in touch with family and friends who are overseas, or who live in other states, but post rarely and only send private messages. The thing is there are people whose votes will be swayed by public opinion in those types of social media.

Recently I showed a similar censoring being done by google.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: burntheships

hmmm, I am taking an accounting class, and I wonder if allowing fake accounts is akin to a regular company misrepresenting sales in order to boost the bottom line? After all, sales are based on views and or users. Could be seen as fraud maybe?

originally posted by: lakenheath24

After all, sales are based on views and or users. Could be seen as fraud maybe?

Absolutely, and it was. The guy was indicted.

But Twitter is allowing this even now, letting hundreds of thousands of
accounts to be ran by software bots!

a reply to: DBCowboy

Facebook is not private.

Look up FB on the NASDAQ

a reply to: Gryphon66

Thinking 101 -

Collusion: noun: collusion

secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others.

a reply to: burntheships

/yawn

Forensics 101

Evidence: facts and/or data demonstrating whether a belief is true or valid (or pure partisan wish-fulfillment).

a reply to: burntheships

Thanks, I did not know that. I will have to google that. Twitter is publicly owned as well,so should be busted as well then. Of course, I see where a Saudi Royal has become the second largest shareholder.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Campaign law 101 -

Against the law to collude, lawsuits are in process.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Gryphon66

Campaign law 101 -

Against the law to collude, lawsuits are in process.

Congressional investigations too, I bet.

Best not look too deeply into inappropriate use of power for political ends.

a reply to: Gryphon66

jampac.us...

It is against the law to take money for political purposes and fraudulently
RIGG the process. Like the flawed Candidate Hillary's most qualifying
achievement to date, avoiding indictment...we will see if the DNC
gets as lucky.

In any case, it is a SHAM in the eyes of the American people!

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Gryphon66

jampac.us...

It is against the law to take money for political purposes and fraudulently
RIG the process. Like the flawed Candidate Hillary's most qualifying
achievement to date, avoiding indictment...we will see if the DNC
gets as lucky.

In any case, it is a SHAM in the eyes of the American people!

Right ... it's against the law ... now, your evidence of how the DNC broke this law?

That'd be the answer to the question.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I'll link it again. Evidence in Complaint to date.
jampac.us...

DNC has committed fraud. Indefensible.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Gryphon66

I'll link it again. Evidence in Complaint to date.
jampac.us...

DNC has committed fraud. Indefensible.

So, no trial is needed? Just toss the rule-of-law out the window?

Accusations, as long as it's against Democrats, are sufficient for conviction?

Gotcha.

a reply to: Gryphon66

People can make up their own mind, obviously.

Facebook and Twitter censoring anti Hillary posts
only makes it more obvious that she is desperate.

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Gryphon66

I'll link it again. Evidence in Complaint to date.
jampac.us...

DNC has committed fraud. Indefensible.

The DNC and Debbie are in big trouble.

Can't wait for the speeches this week.

Their entire platform is a lawsuit !!!

a reply to: Gryphon66

Like the old saying goes....

close enough for government work.

originally posted by: lakenheath24
Of course, I see where a Saudi Royal has become the second largest shareholder.

Very interesting, I will definitely check that out.

originally posted by: xuenchen

The DNC and Debbie are in big trouble.

Can't wait for the speeches this week.

LOL, yep. Probably the highlight all, another conspiracy
coming from HRC. First it was a right wing conspiracy,
now its a vast right wing Russian conspiracy.