Dallas Police Killings - A Tin Foil Hat Analysis

A warning before you read this post: place the tin foil hat on your head and prepare for an analysis of the Dallas shootings from a viewpoint of international conspiracy and geopolitical plotting.

The USA has been falling into a deep and divisive political hole. Here are a few facts that should be taken into consideration when analyzing the situation as is right now.

First some local politics:

1. “Racial” tensions have been rising due to systematic racism and overt police brutality.

2. Drugs and violent crime are omnipresent on American streets.

3. The American prison system has grown exponentially while the American school system is deteriorating.

4. The election campaign and the rise of populism are actively dividing people among ideological lines.

Now some geopolitical factors:

1. The USA has during the Obama Administration followed a foreign policy of retreat and an end to overt projection of US military and political might. This has provided the opportunity for several countries such as for example Russia and China to fill the void in regional struggles for geopolitical control.

2. Even while projecting a certain kind of weakness on geopolitical matters, NATO has been actively provoking Russia by recruiting neighbor states and continuing to supply arms and upgrade defensive systems in the Eastern Europe region.

3. Obama is currently (as of the day of the Dallas police killings) in Poland for a NATO Summit where “U.S. President Barack Obama and leaders of the 27 other NATO countries will decide in Warsaw on how to deal with aggressive moves by Russia, extremist organizations like Islamic State, attacks in cyberspace and other threats to allies' security.” (abcnews)

Now we come to the heart of things. Several powerful countries, such as the USA and Russia have in the recent past actively supported uprisings and acted as foreign influencers during the destabilization of several nations, specifically in the Middle East and in the Ukraine. This includes financial support to opposition parties, rebel groups and other actors that might be able to have political impact. Beyond the financial support, there are also unproven allegations that both the USA and Russia have in several recent conflicts spurred the violence and supported political upheaval by acting as agent provocateurs. But this post is not about those conflicts, so let’s get to the point.

There is a distinct and very likely possibility that the attacks on police during the Black Lives Matter rally was a purposeful provocation by a foreign state seeking to destabilize the United States of America.

The tactics of attacking Law Enforcement during a politically tense demonstration or rally is consistent with what was seen in other countries such as in Syria and the Ukraine. The timing is impeccable, and the target was well chosen.

Due to the incredibly sensitive political nature of this possibility, I do not foresee the American government ever admitting to this, even if it was true. Further analysis of the facts as they emerge will be necessary to completely understand what happened.

Keep in mind, that even if the people responsible for the violence are American citizens, of a political or hateful organization, this does not mean that the theory presented here is invalid. As was pointed out earlier, supporting and inciting potentially dangerous groups is the known modus operandi for creating political upheaval.

You may now remove your hat.

things that make ya go Hmmmmmmmmm....

a reply to: fedeykin

I'm interested OP thinks this could be a "foreign state trying to destabilize the US". Similar to events that have happened in Syria and Ukraine? Can you expand on this at all? Interesting thoughts.


Also, it's interesting to look at BLM funding and origins. Take a peak if you're curious at this, "Reds Exploiting Blacks" wwwaim.org...

a reply to: fedeykin

are you insinuating agent provocateurs have infiltrated BLM and taken advantage of the overzealous ideology to recruit a few patsy to further their agenda, - I find that hard to beleive...

originally posted by: Tellurian
a reply to: fedeykin

are you insinuating agent provocateurs have infiltrated BLM and taken advantage of the overzealous ideology to recruit a few patsy to further their agenda, - I find that hard to beleive...

I have no proof, hence it is a conspiracy theory. It makes rational sense, but without any kind of evidence it will be a theory. The agenda from what I will continue to call "foreign actors" in order to avoid directly pointing fingers (looking at you Putin), is to destabilize.

Destabilizing internal politics of a nation decreases the political power of a country's leadership and additionally forces them to draw their attention away from geopolitical maneuvers (such as the NATO Summit currently underway) and forces them to focus on internal issues. This is a powerful strategy that has been used throughout history going back to "De Bello Gallico".

You may want to add in the fact that it is currently Texas that is a fulcrum for calls to have a Constitutional Congress of the States. Talk of a Texit is getting a lot of media play these days...especially alternative media.

It does not make rational sense, because your claims are not legit.
Drugs and violent crime are not omnipresent on American streets.
Violent crime is down, #2 should be erased.
The death of 5 police officers will not destabalize our country.
You're trying to hard to shoehorn fit this theory into a reality that does not match it.

originally posted by: fedeykin
A warning before you read this post: place the tin foil hat on your head and prepare for an analysis of the Dallas shootings from a viewpoint of international conspiracy and geopolitical plotting.

The USA has been falling into a deep and divisive political hole. Here are a few facts that should be taken into consideration when analyzing the situation as is right now.

First some local politics:

1. “Racial” tensions have been rising due to systematic racism and overt police brutality.

2. Drugs and violent crime are omnipresent on American streets.

3. The American prison system has grown exponentially while the American school system is deteriorating.

4. The election campaign and the rise of populism are actively dividing people among ideological lines.

Now some geopolitical factors:

1. The USA has during the Obama Administration followed a foreign policy of retreat and an end to overt projection of US military and political might. This has provided the opportunity for several countries such as for example Russia and China to fill the void in regional struggles for geopolitical control.

2. Even while projecting a certain kind of weakness on geopolitical matters, NATO has been actively provoking Russia by recruiting neighbor states and continuing to supply arms and upgrade defensive systems in the Eastern Europe region.

3. Obama is currently (as of the day of the Dallas police killings) in Poland for a NATO Summit where “U.S. President Barack Obama and leaders of the 27 other NATO countries will decide in Warsaw on how to deal with aggressive moves by Russia, extremist organizations like Islamic State, attacks in cyberspace and other threats to allies' security.” (abcnews)

Now we come to the heart of things. Several powerful countries, such as the USA and Russia have in the recent past actively supported uprisings and acted as foreign influencers during the destabilization of several nations, specifically in the Middle East and in the Ukraine. This includes financial support to opposition parties, rebel groups and other actors that might be able to have political impact. Beyond the financial support, there are also unproven allegations that both the USA and Russia have in several recent conflicts spurred the violence and supported political upheaval by acting as agent provocateurs. But this post is not about those conflicts, so let’s get to the point.

There is a distinct and very likely possibility that the attacks on police during the Black Lives Matter rally was a purposeful provocation by a foreign state seeking to destabilize the United States of America.

The tactics of attacking Law Enforcement during a politically tense demonstration or rally is consistent with what was seen in other countries such as in Syria and the Ukraine. The timing is impeccable, and the target was well chosen.

Due to the incredibly sensitive political nature of this possibility, I do not foresee the American government ever admitting to this, even if it was true. Further analysis of the facts as they emerge will be necessary to completely understand what happened.

Keep in mind, that even if the people responsible for the violence are American citizens, of a political or hateful organization, this does not mean that the theory presented here is invalid. As was pointed out earlier, supporting and inciting potentially dangerous groups is the known modus operandi for creating political upheaval.

You may now remove your hat.

No tin foil hat necessary. What you described is fully in the realm of possibility and even plausible.

a reply to: fedeykin
have you considered that it just may have been a reaction to the police brutality and killings that has plagued the US for some time now , not everything is a conspiracy , some times it is just what it appears to be .

originally posted by: tom.farnhill
a reply to: fedeykin
have you considered that it just may have been a reaction to the police brutality and killings that has plagued the US for some time now , not everything is a conspiracy , some times it is just what it appears to be .

That's what my first thought was, yes. But Occam's Razor should be applied with the inclusion of all known facts with the desired result to exclude as many assumptions as possible. In such a complex environment as is the case with any social unrest it is almost impossible to arrive at a conclusion based solely on facts.

The reasons for this is that the actions of such a multitude of people with so many different agendas, mixed with generally chaotic conditions makes the gathering of data difficult. It is also very difficult to trust the veracity of the presented data, and hence assumptions must be made, such as the assumption that the government is telling the truth (and this is an assumption that I generally have issues with).

In any case, this remains nothing but a theory at present.

originally posted by: fedeykin
But Occam's Razor should be applied with the inclusion of all known facts with the desired result to exclude as many assumptions as possible. In such a complex environment as is the case with any social unrest it is almost impossible to arrive at a conclusion based solely on facts.

Add to that all the unknown facts leading up to this. Like, how many times the government has used false flags and patsies, gotten away with it, and what data they collected to fine-tune their methods, up until now.

I think Occam's Razor is useless when highly-skilled conspirators may be hatching plans that are specifically designed to defeat it.

originally posted by: Orionx2
What happened to the other 3 people they arrested they thought was with the shooter?

They're already buried in the desert, out past Terlingua.

wrong thread - sorry

I 100% disagree.
A - Blacks commit 5 x more crimes than whites, I cannot guarantee if there is a police aggravation here but there are reasons for that isn't it?
B - Cair and the Muslim Brotherhood have been infiltrating in the USA and in Europe, Dems have been collaborating widely with it, also the EU community.
C - Cair and Islam in general are claiming an alliance with BLM, regardless the fact that Islam has been more active than Europeans on the slave trade, cutting the penises of the males and exploiting the women as sexual slaves and killing the eventual black kids.
D - That is a good scenario for a major confrontation with genocidal overtones, and seems to be a global one, MSM is just putting up with it.
E - NWO intensifies.

July 11, 2016

Why is the mainstream media (Fox/Cnn) saying that the Dallas shootings is the largest attack on police since 9-11? The terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 were NOT attacks on Police. Right?

DALLAS IS THE LARGEST attack on USA police officers in modern times.