Darrell Issa: There Is Enough Evidence to Indict Hillary Clinton

there was a thread 3 weeks about about the indictment being "imminent"

it is obviously being stalled for a reason

out choice is an illusion

Sure he does sure he does.

After she becomes president there will not be anything anyone can do about what she has done.

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
there was a thread 3 weeks about about the indictment being "imminent"

it is obviously being stalled for a reason

out choice is an illusion

Consider that the Dems may want a brokered convention to put in a Biden/Warren ticket. They have to hold off Bernie and wait for the right moment to get Hillary. She can then graciously step down [and be pardoned and gone from politics forever] and the Dems can have a winning ticket.

a reply to: rickymouse

Was Mussolini still technically in power when the people got a hold of him and delivered justice?

originally posted by: Picklesneeze
a reply to: rickymouse

Was Mussolini still technically in power when the people got a hold of him and delivered justice?

The rules are stronger in this country, the president is immune unless impeached. Impeachment rarely happens. It won't happen for these kinds of charges.

Why can't we get a decent and honest president. They seem to choose the biggest liars for us to pick from.

Oh, trump doesn't actually lie too much, at least not knowingly, he just has a big head and ego. He has succeeded, so his ego and head are justifiable. He is not pulling our tail.

a reply to: rickymouse

The rules don't seem to be working.

Luckily people are getting to the breaking point and realize that the only way to get rid of a tyrannical admin/gov is to violently overthrow it.

Hillary not being brought to justice will be one more nail in the proverbial coffin.

originally posted by: Picklesneeze
a reply to: scubagravy

Some of us actually care if the "person" running for president is a criminal/traitor.

And we know she is, you know how? from 50 other thread we've already had about it.

a reply to: scubagravy

There is no such thing as too much honesty.

The investigation is just to say they did one. This goes nowhere. She made sure people were afraid of her long ago when bodies started piling up.

originally posted by: Picklesneeze
a reply to: rickymouse

The rules don't seem to be working.

Luckily people are getting to the breaking point and realize that the only way to get rid of a tyrannical admin/gov is to violently overthrow it.

Hillary not being brought to justice will be one more nail in the proverbial coffin.

We don't need to overthrow our government, we need to get serious and try to get honest and sincere people into Congress and the White House. The thing is that these congressmen need to make deals so they get cooperation from other congressmen to get things for their districts. We need to put the taxpayers money into necessary things, not pork barrel projects used to stimulate support and reelection. We have major issues to fix, it won't be easy.

a reply to: xuenchen

I find it difficult to believe that she will be indicted when the elite that controls the establishments of both the Democratic and Republican Parties are still pulling all the strings behind the scenes.

There are no doubt monumental crimes of Madame Clinton still to be revealed, and it is possible that some friends of humanity all about the internet have the capacity to dump such information in a coordinated effort.

May they do so soon

No one in a sane frame of mind should bank on any part of the USA's government indicting Madame Clinton over anything. Bringing her down politically and juridically is entirely in the hands of ordinary people because the USA's federal system is entirely rigged.

a reply to: xuenchen

As much as I'd like to see her go down is it any surprise a Republican is making this claim? What else would he say? She may get a slap on the wrist? Of course he's gonna say this!

Whatever the case will be I don't think any of it will be relevant till after the election. It's funny, both Clinton's FBI investigation and Trumps fraud lawsuit are all to be settled after the election.

I'm sure the five other right wing wackos who post here will be very excited to read this inconsequential bit of half truth. We get it. Hillary's corrupt. Can you actually do something about it please instead of posting to the same people here? Start a real protest we can all get behind.

Bears repeating with emphasis:

originally posted by: In4ormant

When this parasite becomes POTUS we will know it's the end. If someone this openly corrupt and criminal can attain it we are all screwed.

One quibble . . . it's a bit weakly put . . .

we'd be all HORRIFICALLY AND BRUTALLY SCREWED.

WORTH REPEATING AGAIN WITH EMPHASIS:

originally posted by: Kapriti
a reply to: xuenchen

I find it difficult to believe that she will be indicted when the elite that controls the establishments of both the Democratic and Republican Parties are still pulling all the strings behind the scenes.

There are no doubt monumental crimes of Madame Clinton still to be revealed, and it is possible that some friends of humanity all about the internet have the capacity to dump such information in a coordinated effort.

May they do so soon

No one in a sane frame of mind should bank on any part of the USA's government indicting Madame Clinton over anything. Bringing her down politically and juridically is entirely in the hands of ordinary people because the USA's federal system is entirely rigged.

However, those who aid and abet this treasonous bw*tch will bear the same punishments she incurs.

The universal law that we reap what we sow operates for all . . . all the time . . . regardless of when the "harvest comes in!"

One cannot plant cacti ruthlessly decade in and decade out and forever expect to harvest only strawberries and warm fuzzy lesbian orgies at Camp David that leave the guards feeling ill.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
WORTH REPEATING AGAIN WITH EMPHASIS:

originally posted by: Kapriti
a reply to: xuenchen

I find it difficult to believe that she will be indicted when the elite that controls the establishments of both the Democratic and Republican Parties are still pulling all the strings behind the scenes.

There are no doubt monumental crimes of Madame Clinton still to be revealed, and it is possible that some friends of humanity all about the internet have the capacity to dump such information in a coordinated effort.

May they do so soon

No one in a sane frame of mind should bank on any part of the USA's government indicting Madame Clinton over anything. Bringing her down politically and juridically is entirely in the hands of ordinary people because the USA's federal system is entirely rigged.

However, those who aid and abet this treasonous bw*tch will bear the same punishments she incurs.

The universal law that we reap what we sow operates for all . . . all the time . . . regardless of when the "harvest comes in!"

One cannot plant cacti ruthlessly decade in and decade out and forever expect to harvest only strawberries and warm fuzzy lesbian orgies at Camp David that leave the guards feeling ill.

England pulled out of the EU before hades rains down on it.....methinks on a hunch that there is a direct EU connection to 911....and that when the truth is known and assimilated globally Uncle Sam will be locked and loaded and ready to roll....and that England will be riding shotgun with Russia flanking the play covering China......something about Germany and Japans union makes me suspect a repeat......for these reasons I doubt Hillary ends up in Office.She will not be wheel when TSHTF....because methinks her cabal is going to be the ones remediated.So who in the EU has pickled Americas onions because Merry Olde England just PAVED THE ROAD for the USA to let the hounds loose.

a reply to: scubagravy
I see rhetoric tripe words , but you left out the link(s) to the other threads you so readily mentioned. I would so like to check them out...

a reply to: scubagravy
So , quit baiting and point us to the other 50

a reply to: one4all

I'd love to see you elaborate that at some length in an OP to a new thread you started.

Sounds quite perceptive in at least some respects.

Thanks.