It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
People who watch MSNBC and CNN exclusively can answer more questions about domestic events than people who watch no news at all. People who only watch Fox did much worse. NPR listeners answered more questions correctly than people in any other category.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UnBreakable
He didn't run in the primaries so was not an opponent who lost in the primaries but then the winner made him veep. Which is what I said never happened and won't now.
Maybe it did happen way back in the gaslight days which would require much social studying to find out LOL but let's just assume I'm talking twentieth century onward . I was three when Kennedy was elected. BTW
At six when he was assassinated I already knew who he was and what ever my version of what president was back then which might have been along the line of a king.
But I'm going to give this one to you because he was somehow an opponent outside the roll.
Still I don't see it with these two .
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UnBreakable
Ok. Did you notice that in any case, online or telephone polls, Clinton was still leading Trump?
originally posted by: stosh64
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: stosh64
Bernie has always been a big supporter of Climate Change policies and equal opportunities. What are you talking about?
Are you kidding?
Bernie has done nothing but rally against corruption in Government brought about by corporate oligarchy.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UnBreakable
Why do you suppose anyone would not admit to supporting him?
Are they ashamed, guilt by association?
Are they worried about what people will think?
Like some discerning members of the GOP who won't "admit" their support either?
But under cover of the voting booth...dum ta dum dum. (Perry mason music)
Her lead goes from 9 pts to 4 pts.
Do you know how many times the lead in the polls will flip-flop in the next five months? After each convention and debates. Also if Hillary's lead is only 2 or 3 pts come November, those 5% hiding behind online and landline phones will make up the difference.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UnBreakable
He didn't run in the primaries so was not an opponent who lost in the primaries but then the winner made him veep. Which is what I said never happened and won't now.
Maybe it did happen way back in the gaslight days which would require much social studying to find out LOL but let's just assume I'm talking twentieth century onward . I was three when Kennedy was elected. BTW
At six when he was assassinated I already knew who he was and what ever my version of what president was back then which might have been along the line of a king.
But I'm going to give this one to you because he was somehow an opponent outside the roll.
Still I don't see it with these two .
I still say her VP pick will be Julian Castro. It should be Corey Booker but she's afraid he'll outshine her. He's more popular than she is.
originally posted by: butcherguy
You are seeing this through the eyes of Hillary supporter.
To a lot of Bernie supporters, he just sold out.