It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Even if Trump reaches the magic number of 1,237 the media and RNC are touting, that does not mean Trump is automatically the nominee," Haugland said. "The votes earned during the primary process are only estimates and are not legal convention votes. The only official votes to nominate a candidate are those that are cast from the convention floor.
originally posted by: carewemust
from his history I would say that Curly is just an attention seeker. just like that reporter who said that Donald Trump's assistant threw her to the floor.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: carewemust
from his history I would say that Curly is just an attention seeker. just like that reporter who said that Donald Trump's assistant threw her to the floor.
I think this guy runs the risk of being unseated at the convention given his comments.
The thing is, though, that the 1237 threshold and any binding can be removed by the rules committee before the first ballot starts, at least if I have understood the process at the convention correctly.
Popcorn, beer , TV.
originally posted by: seeker1963
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: carewemust
from his history I would say that Curly is just an attention seeker. just like that reporter who said that Donald Trump's assistant threw her to the floor.
I think this guy runs the risk of being unseated at the convention given his comments.
The thing is, though, that the 1237 threshold and any binding can be removed by the rules committee before the first ballot starts, at least if I have understood the process at the convention correctly.
Popcorn, beer , TV.
Priebus, was on FOX today saying that there would be "NO RULE CHANGES".
roflmao
The people will hopefully finally be able to see "2 wings on the same vulture"! No offense to vultures...
originally posted by: introvert
Undermining the process and uprooting Trump is the only chance they have at potentially putting up a fight for the White House. Trump is a guaranteed loser if he goes against Hillary or Sanders.
I can see why they would do it, but not sure it is very ethical.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: introvert
Undermining the process and uprooting Trump is the only chance they have at potentially putting up a fight for the White House. Trump is a guaranteed loser if he goes against Hillary or Sanders.
I can see why they would do it, but not sure it is very ethical.
What difference will it make who they nominate? None of the Republican candidates will beat Hilary. Hilary has already been ordained as the next 'Criminal-in-Chief'.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: introvert
Undermining the process and uprooting Trump is the only chance they have at potentially putting up a fight for the White House. Trump is a guaranteed loser if he goes against Hillary or Sanders.
I can see why they would do it, but not sure it is very ethical.
What difference will it make who they nominate? None of the Republican candidates will beat Hilary. Hilary has already been ordained as the next 'Criminal-in-Chief'.
originally posted by: introvert
Undermining the process and uprooting Trump is the only chance they have at potentially putting up a fight for the White House. Trump is a guaranteed loser if he goes against Hillary or Sanders.
I can see why they would do it, but not sure it is very ethical.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: introvert
Undermining the process and uprooting Trump is the only chance they have at potentially putting up a fight for the White House. Trump is a guaranteed loser if he goes against Hillary or Sanders.
I can see why they would do it, but not sure it is very ethical.
What difference will it make who they nominate? None of the Republican candidates will beat Hilary. Hilary has already been ordained as the next 'Criminal-in-Chief'.
That's because none of them, except Kasich, seems to have what it takes to beat Hillary.
And let's be factually correct here. She is not a criminal. That will come later, if at all.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: UKTruth
If they do this, it will be the end of the GOP. People are paying attention this election. If they think that people are just going to roll over and vote for whoever they choose, against the will of the people, then they are delusional.
The voters have shown how they feel this election.
Some of the top party seem to recognize what will happen if they change the rules to go against the voters. Hopefully the rational ones will dominate the stupid ones.
.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: UnBreakable
80% of the people you talk to would vote Trump over the witch that doesn't surprise me. Like minded people usually consult each other, but polls are somewhat indiscriminate (not all). Most polls say he will be slaughtered if he is the nominee.
He polls about 50% with the republicans but they only account for about 30% of the electorate he polls single digits with the Dems and less than 10% with the independents. The majority of the voters are decided on Trump very few are undecided. Trump can't win enough votes to win.