It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Woodcarver
So woody
I am guessing you believe we evolved from space dust and spacewater
That makes a great deal of sense, ha ha ha
You win the internet
evolution doesnt apply until life has already generated. before that, its sheer physics and chemistry, no biology.
and everything - literally everything around you - is comprised of matter forged in the hearts of stars that died long ago. this is fact.
originally posted by: Tucket
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: newnature1
The bible never sets out to prove there is a God. It assumes that God exists and never questions that assumption. Can science ignore the assumptions within Genesis?
The real question is why do christians ignore the fact that they believe in a being that has zero evidence to support it?
I think it's about the idea of having faith.. and so, scientific evidence wouldn't matter..
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Tucket
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: newnature1
The bible never sets out to prove there is a God. It assumes that God exists and never questions that assumption. Can science ignore the assumptions within Genesis?
The real question is why do christians ignore the fact that they believe in a being that has zero evidence to support it?
I think it's about the idea of having faith.. and so, scientific evidence wouldn't matter..
maybe they should do a trust fall off a tall building and see which wins, faith or science.
originally posted by: newnature1
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Woodcarver
So woody
I am guessing you believe we evolved from space dust and spacewater
That makes a great deal of sense, ha ha ha
You win the internet
evolution doesnt apply until life has already generated. before that, its sheer physics and chemistry, no biology.
and everything - literally everything around you - is comprised of matter forged in the hearts of stars that died long ago. this is fact.
Well said, we can learn a lot from that fifth 'a day' about what you just said.
originally posted by: newnature1
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Tucket
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: newnature1
The bible never sets out to prove there is a God. It assumes that God exists and never questions that assumption. Can science ignore the assumptions within Genesis?
The real question is why do christians ignore the fact that they believe in a being that has zero evidence to support it?
I think it's about the idea of having faith.. and so, scientific evidence wouldn't matter..
maybe they should do a trust fall off a tall building and see which wins, faith or science.
People do put their faith in the wrong thing. What is interesting, God was on the earth before he flood this out
www.youtube.com... God told Noah to build a boat. But Noah took God at his word and for the next 300 years he was building a boat.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: newnature1
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
originally posted by: newnature1
originally posted by: ms898
Science would look at the evidence. Evidence is lacking.... it very well to assume something, but science then has to prove it to get acceptance from the scientific community.
My belief is that they wouldn’t assume it because there is very little evidence that there is a god.
There is fossil evidence of those giants on the earth before the flood. These abnormal beings, their destruction was necessary for the preservation of the human race, and for the faithfulness of Yahweh’s Word (Gen. 3:15). Wouldn't science want to know who was behind breeding these beings?
Do you mean the dinosaurs?
The dinosaurs were before the sixth 'a day'.
So the giant fossils you speak of, are you talking about dinosaur fossils or giant human fossils?
originally posted by: Tucket
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Tucket
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: newnature1
The bible never sets out to prove there is a God. It assumes that God exists and never questions that assumption. Can science ignore the assumptions within Genesis?
The real question is why do christians ignore the fact that they believe in a being that has zero evidence to support it?
I think it's about the idea of having faith.. and so, scientific evidence wouldn't matter..
maybe they should do a trust fall off a tall building and see which wins, faith or science.
That sounds perfectly logical.
Not sure if Jesus will let me, though.. he's pretty protective.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
One thing I'm %100 sure of, Jesus will let you DIE if you jump from a high enough building.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: newnature1
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Woodcarver
So woody
I am guessing you believe we evolved from space dust and spacewater
That makes a great deal of sense, ha ha ha
You win the internet
evolution doesnt apply until life has already generated. before that, its sheer physics and chemistry, no biology.
and everything - literally everything around you - is comprised of matter forged in the hearts of stars that died long ago. this is fact.
Well said, we can learn a lot from that fifth 'a day' about what you just said.
many parallels may be drawn, but the fact remains that metaphysical texts are not a basis for scientific procedure.
originally posted by: newnature1
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Tucket
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: newnature1
The bible never sets out to prove there is a God. It assumes that God exists and never questions that assumption. Can science ignore the assumptions within Genesis?
The real question is why do christians ignore the fact that they believe in a being that has zero evidence to support it?
I think it's about the idea of having faith.. and so, scientific evidence wouldn't matter..
maybe they should do a trust fall off a tall building and see which wins, faith or science.
People do put their faith in the wrong thing. What is interesting, God was on the earth before he flood this out
www.youtube.com... God told Noah to build a boat. But Noah took God at his word and for the next 300 years he was building a boat.
the noah myth has been pretty thoroughly debunked.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: newnature1
That's a hoax video.
You need some serious work.
I've wasted enough time here.
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: newnature1
Im non religious
originally posted by: newnature1
originally posted by: Tucket
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: Tucket
originally posted by: Woodcarver
originally posted by: newnature1
The bible never sets out to prove there is a God. It assumes that God exists and never questions that assumption. Can science ignore the assumptions within Genesis?
The real question is why do christians ignore the fact that they believe in a being that has zero evidence to support it?
I think it's about the idea of having faith.. and so, scientific evidence wouldn't matter..
maybe they should do a trust fall off a tall building and see which wins, faith or science.
That sounds perfectly logical.
Not sure if Jesus will let me, though.. he's pretty protective.
Every temptation is first a thought introduced to our mind by our own carnality or the tempters themselves. If we ruminate on that thought and consider it an option, we will eventually act on it.
Can science ignore the assumptions within Genesis?
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
a reply to: newnature1
Read this...
Your giant human skeletons are a hoax
Don't be so brainwashed. Heaven is a lie.
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
a reply to: newnature1
Can science ignore the assumptions within Genesis?
Yes.
Science has already attempted to answer the God hypothesis and there's nothing there to quantify.
It's just hopes and faith something scientist whom deal in the empirical want no part in.
a reply to: Raggedyman
Yes scientist's embrace assumptions, they embrace them so as to find evidence to support said assumptions.
The only assumptions that are ignored are ones that have been disproven through evidence of the contrary or lack their of.