A Detailed History of Hillary Clinton's Transgressions, Lies, and Chicanery

In researching sourced materials for another thread, I came across a detailed accounting of Clinton's role in the impeachment proceedings of Nixon. While the stories of what transpired have been argued at length in the past, it lead me on a new train of thought. So many posters have made references of Clinton's wrongdoings in the past, and provided links to support their positions. References of the email scandal, Bengazi, and using her position as SoS for personal gain are common, but what other historically documented events that exhibit a pattern of deceit and circumventing rules and laws can be attributed to her? That's the motivation for posting this thread. Lets begin.

1. Hillary's Role in the Impeachment Of Richard Nixon and subsequent "firing":
Upon graduating from Yale Law School in the early '70s, Hillary was hired on to the Watergate Investigation and subsequent impeachment proceedings of Nixon by the backing of her former law professor, Burke Marshall. Clinton was given the task of researching American impeachment cases, but ultimately aligned herself with "special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation." Jerry Zeifman, the general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee who supervised Clinton’s work on the Watergate investigation in 1974, stated this:

Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, called Clinton a “liar” and “an unethical, dishonest lawyer.” He contends Clinton was collaborating with allies of the Kennedys to block revelation of Kennedy-administration activities that made Watergate “look like a day at the beach.” Her brief, Zeifman said, was so fraudulent and ridiculous, she would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge. Polk confirmed Clinton wrote a brief arguing Nixon should not be granted legal counsel due to a lack of precedent. But Clinton deliberately ignored the then-recent case of Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, who was allowed to have a lawyer during the impeachment attempt against him in 1970. Moreover, Zeifman claims Clinton bolstered her fraudulent brief by removing all of the Douglas files from public access and storing them at her office, enabling her to argue as if the case never existed. Polk confirmed the Clinton memo ignored the Douglas case, but he could not confirm or dispel the claim that Hillary removed the files. Read more at www.wnd.com...

Zeifman was so incensed at Clinton's actions that he claims to have " fired Clinton from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation". Clinton's allies have refuted Zeifman's version of the events, and claimed he didn't have the authority to fire her. It must be noted that Zeifman's recollection of the incident was backed by the then panel's head Republican counsel. So egregious was Clinton's actions, in Zeifman's view, to "submit a brief so fraudulent and ridiculous", that he believed "Hillary would have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge". (1,2 & 3)

I believe this incident is important in that it set a precedent by Hillary very early in her career that lies of omission are simply that--lies. It also starts a pattern with her in that if she has an agenda, rules and trust be damned, the end justifies the means.

2. Hillary's Involvement in "Track the Money" Project:
Vince Foster Jr. wasn't just a colleague of Clinton's, he held position at the NSA and later became the Clinton WH Deputy Counsel. Foster, Webster Hubbell, and Clinton were the attorneys of record for Systematics, an Arkansas-affiliated banking computer services firm. Systematics assisted Household International in overseeing former CIA Director William Colby's "Tracking the Money" Project, the "successor to the CIA-linked NUGAN-HAND BANK", and linked to future S&L and securities dirty business(Hillary's later involvement with Foster via Chicago-based Hopkins & Sutter in the '90s is a topic for another thread).

"Starting in the late 1970s, VINCENT W. FOSTER, JR., purportedly a partner in the ROSE LAW FIRM, LITTLE ROCK, played a key espionage role. He came to hold the equivalent rank of general in the super-duper code-cracking intelligence operation known as the NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY [NSA]. He continued that role even after becoming, in 1993, CLINTON WHITE HOUSE DEPUTY COUNSEL. "FOSTER functioned, in combination with law partners HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON and WEBSTER HUBBELL, as head of a bank spying project, an offshoot of HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, alter ego and successor to the CIA-linked NUGAN-HAND BANK. After the purported collapse of NUGAN-HAND BANK, in 1980, HOUSEHOLD took over their worldwide operations, CALIFORNIA, AUSTRALIA, PHILIPPINES, PACIFIC BASIN, SAUDI, LONDON, AND GRANDCAYMANS, among other places. "Among their functions, TRANSFERRING COVERT OPERATION FUNDS, ASSASSINATION TEAM FUNDING, SKIMMING OF DOPE, GAMBLING, and GUN-RUNNING LOOT; military, civilian, international. U.S. MILITARY ADMIRALS AND GENERALS, as well as INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY OFFICIALS, supposedly either 'retired,' or 'on leave,' operated NUGAN-HAND, and aided thereafter HOUSEHOLD and its numerous units and subsidiaries. Former CIA DIRECTOR WILLIAM COLBY was overseer of both NUGAN-HAND and HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL. "The 'TRACKING THE MONEY' project was conducted over-all by HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL with the assistance reportedly of SYSTEMATICS, a banking computer services firm, originally a subsidiary of an Arkansas-based operation. Targeted have been the banks of both friends and enemies alike. FOSTER and his crew - HILLARY AND WEBSTER - used as a COVER that they were supposedly 'ATTORNEYS' for SYSTEMATICS.

(3,4 & 6)
Hillary's involvement with Foster seems to be a reoccurring issue when talking of dark events and shady deals, from his days at Rose Law Firm and the WH Travel Scandal in the '90s, until his questionable suicide in 1993. Hillary's involvement with Systematics paints a picture of someone willing to get her hands dirty, and participate to an unknown extent in nefarious dealings.



End of part 1

Part 2


3. Clinton's Poor Memory when being questioned about her involvement in...most things.
Hillary has been called upon at different times in her life by various entities to account for her involvement in incidents, deals, actions that are questionable. This woman is extremely intelligent, erudite and articulate. However, when pressed to recall events that could cast blame or duplicity upon herself, her memory seems to go blank. I understand the strategy of avoiding self-incrimination, but to dodge the basic responsibility for one's actions with the frequency Clinton has achieved is abhorrent.
Here are some examples:
-When questioned by Rand Paul as to which agency was responsible for overseeing the Annex in Bengazi, where weapons to Syrian fighters were rumored to be transiting, HRC replied: "I don't know. I have no information on that". How could she forget, as Panetta, Petraeus and her presented plans to arm Syrian Rebels to BHO, which the NYT reported was shot down by WH Officials.
-When questioned by 2 separate investigations as to her involvement in Castle Grande fraudulent land acquisitions during the Whitewater Scandal, she denied any knowledge of CG. "This is the first I've heard of Castle Grande". I guess she also forgot the billable hours recorded by Rose Law on her work on this project, and the 15 conversations with Seth Ward, Webster Hubbell's father-in-law(see above), who assisted in land deals for the CG project.
-When questioned by House Select Committee member Rep. Martha Roby on the contents of an email(Tab 31) and our "presence" in Libya, Clinton replied: "I'm sorry. I have no recollection".
There are more examples, but you get the drift.(2,7, 8 &9)

This is the Democratic front-runner, the D's hope for the WH. This is a woman who has made a career out of gathering wealth and power, something her and Bill vowed they would never become back in the '70s, as members of the "New Democrats". This is also a person who has been involved in questionable business dealings, and profited on a personal level from interventions while SoS(UBS deal:www.abovetopsecret.com...). I wish I could mail this post to all those thinking she should be the next POTUS. How can she be a leading candidate?(rhetorical). How is it she hasn't been held accountable for her actions?

Sources::
1. "HOW HILLARY TRIED TO SAVE NIXON" by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard - Watergate
[VCEPolitics.com] - The Nixon links: Now more than ever - Norman Nithman
2. www.eohistory.info...
3. www.angelfire.com...
4. www.angelfire.com...
5. "Catalyst Coup", Erik Lenhart, Slavak Journal of Political Sciences, pp. 106-110
6. Clandestine Projects, Sherman H. Skolnick, Conspiracy Nation, -- Vol. 8 Num. 18
7. www.breitbart.com...
8. www.wnd.com...
9. www.nytimes.com...

Holy jeebus dude, that's pretty impressive digging ya done there. When I actually care about cankles and sausage fingers Hillary I may actually read most of it.

Don't worry, she wont get elected, not a chance. She wont progress the war machine like the upper half's would want. We are in the final stage of take down America per the elitist agenda. Shes too soft core porn for them.....and she has cankles.......and sausage fingers........

HA you said chicanery in yer title.

S&F tho chief....

Hilary's greatest hits, now available on K-Tel records... $9.99, no C.O.D.

You know, of course, the liberals will be here soon to explain how ALL of this is a Republican conspiracy.

As I mentioned in an earlier thread, they could have proof that H.R.C. eats roasted babies with a side of fried puppies for breakfast, and they would spin it into her being an environmental champion... she recycles!

a reply to: BooCrackers

No pooh Dude, I'm spent. What started as one thread turned into a 6 hour project. I often posted how sleazy HRC is, now I've got some backup. I also got to use "erudite". That was worth some wood!

originally posted by: madmac5150
Hilary's greatest hits, now available on K-Tel records... $9.99, no C.O.D.

You know, of course, the liberals will be here soon to explain how ALL of this is a Republican conspiracy.

As I mentioned in an earlier thread, they could have proof that H.R.C. eats roasted babies with a side of fried puppies for breakfast, and they would spin it into her being an environmental champion... she recycles!

When your own party labels you "untrustworthy", it's a well earned moniker.

Great Thread !!


Keeping for reference.

originally posted by: Boscowashisnamo
a reply to: BooCrackers

No pooh Dude, I'm spent. What started as one thread turned into a 6 hour project. I often posted how sleazy HRC is, now I've got some backup. I also got to use "erudite". That was worth some wood!

I am sure if you kept digging, the rabbit hole would only go deeper. I had a friend that worked for the Clinton administration... he quit. I have heard stories that lead me to believe that they are both true sociopaths.

No, I will not repeat those stories. I was told in confidence.

The Clintons have a lot of suspected blood on their hands... as well as documented murders carried out by the Clinton administration. Waco and Ruby Ridge are examples of how the Clintons operate, and, more recently Benghazi. Of course, H.R.C. avows that we lost no Americans in Benghazi, but there are pi$$ed off families of the deceased that have a valid claim to the contrary.

originally posted by: BooCrackers
Holy jeebus dude, that's pretty impressive digging ya done there. When I actually care about cankles and sausage fingers Hillary I may actually read most of it.

And the OP didn't even touch on Whitewater or the the Arkansas-Columbia "alleged" drug running connection or a host of others. I'd like to know how the Clinton Foundation increased in assets by an almost identical amount to the amount "missing" from the state department during her tenure?

Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: Boscowashisnamo

Love that ^^^

"B", I was hoping you would include all the missing Clinton cronies from the past. Any chance you'll extend the thread?

Hillary's involvement with Foster seems to be a reoccurring issue when talking of dark events and shady deals, from his days at Rose Law Firm and the WH Travel Scandal in the '90s, until his questionable suicide in 1993. Hillary's involvement with Systematics paints a picture of someone willing to get her hands dirty, and participate to an unknown extent in nefarious dealings

Foster was suicided.

None could ever convince me otherwise.

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle

originally posted by: BooCrackers
Holy jeebus dude, that's pretty impressive digging ya done there. When I actually care about cankles and sausage fingers Hillary I may actually read most of it.

And the OP didn't even touch on Whitewater or the the Arkansas-Columbia "alleged" drug running connection or a host of others. I'd like to know how the Clinton Foundation increased in assets by an almost identical amount to the amount "missing" from the state department during her tenure?

Cheers - Dave

I ran outta steam and got short on time. I had to leave out several items due to space as well. The one thing that kept cropping up in relation to the OP was Household In't. That entity was listed in a mid 90s lawsuit filed against HRC, drug running/CIA accusations, and also appeared in an allegation of $48 million that eventually found its way to the Cayman Islands, under the account Chelsea Jefferson--and attributed to HRC. That deserves a thread of its own.

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: Boscowashisnamo

Love that ^^^

"B", I was hoping you would include all the missing Clinton cronies from the past. Any chance you'll extend the thread?

I'm pretty computer illiterate, but have a Part 2 planned. There is so much out there, and an equal amount on the Bush family. For so many reasons including the above I never wanted to see Jeb or Hillary taking the oath next January.

originally posted by: Boscowashisnamo
I'm pretty computer illiterate, but have a Part 2 planned. There is so much out there, and an equal amount on the Bush family. For so many reasons including the above I never wanted to see Jeb or Hillary taking the oath next January.

Don't know much about Bush Jr. I've heard some pretty harry stories about Sr. Some of 'em from my grampa ... and I didn't know him to spin tales. I saw him a bunch of times when he was VP and I knew he was way deadlier than Ron Bodine, but somebody could rightfully just accuse me of having the willies.

One'a these days ...

a reply to: Boscowashisnamo

The scary thing is that even if you made every Clinton supporter read all of her history they're still going to vote for her, still going to defend her, and still going to attack anyone who opposes her.

Excellent post and I don't blame you for burning out, there's a lot to dig through.

originally posted by: Snarl

originally posted by: Boscowashisnamo
I'm pretty computer illiterate, but have a Part 2 planned. There is so much out there, and an equal amount on the Bush family. For so many reasons including the above I never wanted to see Jeb or Hillary taking the oath next January.

Don't know much about Bush Jr. I've heard some pretty harry stories about Sr. Some of 'em from my grampa ... and I didn't know him to spin tales. I saw him a bunch of times when he was VP and I knew he was way deadlier than Ron Bodine, but somebody could rightfully just accuse me of having the willies.

One'a these days ...

The Bush family is corrupt. The Clinton family is corrupt. The media force fed Jeb Bush on us... CNN, FOX, etc. spoon fed us everything that Jeb said as Republican gospel... until he lost favor.

They quote everything that Hilary states as factual truth... even her bold faced LIES are off limits to detractors...

The media moguls ALL have deep political ties with the aforementioned families. All one has to do, is follow the money...

As a further indication of the Clinton's political treachery... and a case of history repeating...

During the 1996 election cycle, Pat Buchanan was a candidate much like Trump. He was an outsider. He vowed to take down the establishment. Pat Buchanan was packing in rallies, and gaining serious traction in the Republican primaries. Had Mr. Buchanan won the nomination, he would have faced W.J. Clinton. Then, he got a surprise "endorsement" by David Duke. The media labeled him as a "racist" and his supporters as "ignorant"... the media buried him. Patrick Buchanan was done.

Now, 20 years later... a Republican "outsider" candidate that may face another Clinton... and he receives an uninvited "endorsement" from the same David Duke; the same man used to take down Buchanan 2 decades ago. The media outlets immediately pegged Trump as a "racist", and his voters as "ignorant"... deja-fracking-vu.

The Clintons have DEEP roots in southern politics... you can bet the farm that David Duke was well paid both in 1996, and now.

originally posted by: madmac5150
All one has to do, is follow the money...

I don't know. These people are truly villainous IMVHO. Yeah ... they got a lotta money, but what they were doing was what they were born to do. Extremely scary people. You could be around them for five minutes and realize the definition of mortality. No one could ever explain that to you better than you would know for yourself.

I can't say it better than that. Maybe someone else has better words.

a reply to: madmac5150
And yet , the media doesnt mention the Clinton family's ties and respect for Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd.

originally posted by: Boscowashisnamo

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle

originally posted by: BooCrackers
Holy jeebus dude, that's pretty impressive digging ya done there. When I actually care about cankles and sausage fingers Hillary I may actually read most of it.

And the OP didn't even touch on Whitewater or the the Arkansas-Columbia "alleged" drug running connection or a host of others. I'd like to know how the Clinton Foundation increased in assets by an almost identical amount to the amount "missing" from the state department during her tenure?

Cheers - Dave

I ran outta steam and got short on time. I had to leave out several items due to space as well. The one thing that kept cropping up in relation to the OP was Household In't. That entity was listed in a mid 90s lawsuit filed against HRC, drug running/CIA accusations, and also appeared in an allegation of $48 million that eventually found its way to the Cayman Islands, under the account Chelsea Jefferson--and attributed to HRC. That deserves a thread of its own.

Here's a fun bit of watching for you;



Cheers - Dave

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
The scary thing is that even if you made every Clinton supporter read all of her history they're still going to vote for her, still going to defend her, and still going to attack anyone who opposes her.

Yesterday while searching Google I typed in "Hillary Clinton Jim Jones"...

The two articles below came up, while the second one appears to be satire, it is so close to reality that I never would have suspected it was fictional without the disclaimer.

As more damaging information about Hillary Clinton surfaces, liberals aren’t interested. Not only are they disinterested, they seem to harden their position on her, regardless of how bad that information is. And that’s scary. It reminds me of Jim Jones. Ironically, Jim Jones was a cult leader and -ready for it?- a community organizer and Marxist who also believed in “spreading it around.”

Jones was the darling of the left- at times hosting such notables as Angela Davis. Jim Jones had rabid sycophantic supporters who could not be persuaded by logic. Eerie, no? Over the last day two articles have caught my attention for different reasons and then I noticed what they had in common.

This is not a good person. This is not a nice person. They’ll still vote for her. Hillary could beat a child to death with a hammer live on Kelly and Michael and they’d still vote for her. And if Hillary told them to drink the Kool-Aid, you know they would do it for her. In a second. Hillary Clinton is not a candidate. She is a cult. Welcome to Hillarytown.

Hillary Clinton: The 2016 Reincarnation of Jim Jones - Do Not Drink The Kool-Aid

Hillary Clinton has been clearly mimicking the body language and speech structure of the cult leader James Warren "Jim" Jones... It wasn't until McKay observed the crowds around her that it finally clicked: "Once I made that connection everything started to fall into place effortlessly. It wasn't only Mrs. Clinton's body language. It was also the people around her - they all seemed under some kind of spell. She was consciously manipulating the crowd of minority voters to get them to follow her unconditionally, without question."

Hillary Clinton is no exception; I just find it curious that she is borrowing her techniques directly from Jim Jones. There's no doubt about it."

McKay spent weeks analyzing every word, speech pattern, and body movement made by Hillary Clinton as he painstakingly compiled a psychological case file on the Democratic front-runner. He discovered that Clinton deployed distinctly different combinations of language and demeanor. These combinations, or "sets," remain tucked away in her head like the various pantsuits in her closet, until she decides which one she should put on depending on who the audience is.

According to McKay, those same hypnotic techniques used by Jim Jones can be clearly observed in Hillary Clinton's speeches designed to secure the minority vote.

Hillary mimics cult leader Jim Jones to get minority vote