It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Two objectors, Lawrence Joyce and William Graham, had challenged Cruz’s presidential bid with the board, contending that his name should not appear on the March 15 ballot because his candidacy did not comply with Article II of the Constitution.
Adopting the recommendations of a hearing officer who considered the matter last week, the board of elections on Monday rejected both objections, ruled Cruz eligible and ordered that his name be certified for the election.
“The Candidate is a natural born citizen by virtue of being born in Canada to his mother who was a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth,” the board said, reasoning that Cruz met the criteria because he “did not have to take any steps or go through a naturalization process at some point after birth.”
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Can't get more official than the board of elections in a liberal state.
Case closed.
Well, not really, we'll still need to have him bashed here by the Bernie Brigades.
Some debate exists as to the meaning of this phrase. Consensus exists that anyone born on U.S. soil is a "natural born Citizen." One may also be a "natural born Citizen" if, despite a birth on foreign soil, U.S. citizenship immediately passes from the person's parents.
originally posted by: WeRpeons
I really think the founding fathers interpretation of a natural born citizen was being born on U.S. soil. I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up going to the Supreme Court. It needs to be clearly defined for future candidates or it will continue to be an issue.
Some debate exists as to the meaning of this phrase. Consensus exists that anyone born on U.S. soil is a "natural born Citizen." One may also be a "natural born Citizen" if, despite a birth on foreign soil, U.S. citizenship immediately passes from the person's parents.
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: WeRpeons
I really think the founding fathers interpretation of a natural born citizen was being born on U.S. soil. I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up going to the Supreme Court. It needs to be clearly defined for future candidates or it will continue to be an issue.
Some debate exists as to the meaning of this phrase. Consensus exists that anyone born on U.S. soil is a "natural born Citizen." One may also be a "natural born Citizen" if, despite a birth on foreign soil, U.S. citizenship immediately passes from the person's parents.
I too, think it means born on U.S. Territory.
Just the same, I don't know why anyone would vote for a Canadian. Those people screwed up bacon, for pete's sake.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Flatfish
They kill baby seals too !!!!