CIS study: UN is choosing who will be NEW Americans!

Here's an interesting story that might shed light on why the U.S. Government seems to be lacking the resources and know-how when it comes to vetting refugees that are under consideration for entry into the U.S.

Looks like the U.S. Gov has been actively supporting and funding a United Nations outfit called the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

The U.S. has apparently given this outfit $4.5 billion since the "crisis" in Syria started in 2011 !!!!!!

Well no wonder the U.S. is claiming they can't get the low-down on refugees !!!

Big NWO agenda in play here.

No small wonder we are seeing what we are seeing is it.

Who are the real suckers now?

CIS study: UN is choosing who will be NEW Americans!

What is not common knowledge is that we are also giving another group of people a delicate assignment to accomplish within the refugee resettlement program. Whether this is being accomplished successfully is open to question.

The United States is entrusting the staff of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) with the entire selection and pre-screening process of Syrian refugees eligible for resettlement in the United States. “UNHCR is the United States’ largest partner overseas. We provide substantial funding to that agency,” said Larry Bartlett from the State Department.11 The United States has donated $4.5 billion to UNHCR since the beginning of the Syrian crisis in 2011. For those who question its humanitarian outreach, the United States is the most generous donor to the refugee cause of any nation in the world.

The UNHCR is deciding not only who can move to the United States, it is also choosing who gets a chance to become American and who doesn’t. Given such high stakes, Americans should be encouraged to question this opaque system.

W H A T ??

a reply to: xuenchen

What could possibly go wrong?

The same UN that decided to make Saudi Arabia the head of the Human rights for the UN?

The same UN that has vetted multiple people that have carried out attacks in various forms ?

Awesome!

Um. Why do you make it sound like US authorities play no role? Never mind. It's a rhetorical question.

From the actual report:

Out of the four million-plus registered Syrian refugees in the region, UNHCR has so far submitted 22,427 cases to the United States for resettlement consideration. Of those, about 2,000 were accepted last year.

cis.org...

UNHCR lists two preconditions for resettlement consideration: First, the applicant should be determined by UNHCR to be a refugee. Second, resettlement should be identified as the most appropriate solution after all durable solutions are assessed.

The UNHCR provides an initial determination that applicants have refugee status. US authorities take it from there.

"The United States has donated $4.5 billion to UNHCR since the beginning of the Syrian crisis in 2011. For those who question its humanitarian outreach, the United States is the most generous donor to the refugee cause of any nation in the world."

W H A T ???

The US is the reason for the people to flee, because of that "democracy"-bringing.
How many syrian refugees did the US take, or is willing to take them, maybe, in the future?
Humanitarian outreach, wow, that made me laugh!

originally posted by: ManBehindTheMask
The same UN that decided to make Saudi Arabia the head of the Human rights for the UN?

The same UN that has vetted multiple people that have carried out attacks in various forms ?

Awesome!

Funny how that works isn't it?

Maybe they should make North Korea the next human rights head.

I never realized that it was an ironic posting before.

I wonder how many of these patriotic Syrians want to go back and overthrow their government?

After guerrilla warfare training, of course.

4.5 billion dollars for 2000 refugees.

Those are the richest refugees in the history of the world.

The UN continues to erode our sovereignty and fill their coffers with our money.

a reply to: Phage

All the facts you say?

Pfft.

originally posted by: DerBeobachter
"The United States has donated $4.5 billion to UNHCR since the beginning of the Syrian crisis in 2011. For those who question its humanitarian outreach, the United States is the most generous donor to the refugee cause of any nation in the world."

Can you also provide percentage per capita in comparison to other countries?

a reply to: TinfoilTP

8.5 billion dollars for 2000 refugees.

It's 4.5, but you think the US is paying refugees that money?

Those are the richest refugees in the history of the world.

That's just stupid.

originally posted by: Phage
Um. Why do you make it sound like US authorities play no role? Never mind. It's a rhetorical question.

From the actual report:

Out of the four million-plus registered Syrian refugees in the region, UNHCR has so far submitted 22,427 cases to the United States for resettlement consideration. Of those, about 2,000 were accepted last year.

cis.org...

UNHCR lists two preconditions for resettlement consideration: First, the applicant should be determined by UNHCR to be a refugee. Second, resettlement should be identified as the most appropriate solution after all durable solutions are assessed.

The UNHCR provides an initial determination that applicants have refugee status. US authorities take it from there.

So basically the U.S. is paying an NGO group 4.5 BILLION, to assess people and give us 2,000 new 'citizens'?

...........WHY?

a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

So basically the U.S. is paying an NGO group 4.5 BILLION, to assess people and give us 2,000 new 'citizens'?

No. The US is, and has been, contributing to assist refugees.

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees was established on December 14, 1950 by the United Nations General Assembly. The agency is mandated to lead and co-ordinate international action to protect refugees and resolve refugee problems worldwide. Its primary purpose is to safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees. It strives to ensure that everyone can exercise the right to seek asylum and find safe refuge in another State, with the option to return home voluntarily, integrate locally or to resettle in a third country. It also has a mandate to help stateless people.

www.unhcr.org...

Also, refugees which are accepted to the US are not given citizen status until, and unless they go through the naturalization process.

The US has been helping fund the UNHCR since the 1950s why is it a problem now?

They work in 123 countries to help and protect millions of refugees.

Yes the UN acts a pre screening agency and then the ones who pass go through the US screening. Takes a couple of years and about 1% make it through both processes. The US pays the UN to create camps for the refugees in other countries so we do not have to pay for and have them here. It is just common sense folks and it is cheaper. Did you think the US just let anybody apply for refugee status and then do the US screening? No that would be massively expensive. The UN weeds out most of them at a much cheaper rate. And how is this a surprise? Where have you people been for the last 50 plus years?

Expensive refugees.

I wonder what 4.5 Billion could do for U.S. Veterans that have half their faces blown off....

a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

If you want to talk about apples and oranges, ok.

The President's 2016 Budget includes $168.8 billion for VA in 2016. This includes $70.2 billion in discretionary resources and $95.3 billion in mandatory funding.

www.va.gov...

So people want extensive screening for the refugees but then complain when that costs money..

originally posted by: Phage
It's 4.5, but you think the US is paying refugees that money?

No

But the US Tax payer is footing the bill and getting the shaft.

Two for one deal to the tune of 4.5 Billion.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain

If you want to talk about apples and oranges, ok.

The President's 2016 Budget includes $168.8 billion for VA in 2016. This includes $70.2 billion in discretionary resources and $95.3 billion in mandatory funding.

www.va.gov...

Let's make it 173.3 Billion in VA spending, and forget refugees.

I like Oranges, not so much Apples.