It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: 3danimator2014
See above post.
I saw it...still dont get what you are saying
originally posted by: greencmp
originally posted by: 3danimator2014
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: 3danimator2014
See above post.
I saw it...still dont get what you are saying
greencmp:
They will benefit from SpaceX's work and take new risks resulting in even better understanding of the technologies involved.
phage:
Yes. That's possible.
It's also possible that they will avoid any such venture and direct their resources elsewhere. Not every company has an Elon Musk at the helm.
greencmp:
Well, that's what happened with every other technological innovation isn't it?
The pioneers failed so no one ever dared venture down those paths ever again.
phage:
Nope. Not every one. Obviously. But some.
Concorde was a wonderful thing.
greencmp:
And it was government that restricted its commercial use.
originally posted by: Phage
Awesome. Now we can blow up Jupiter...again.
When NASA announced its “Galileo into Jupiter” option, among those to publish immediate, serious objections (and later to repeat them on “Coast to Coast AM”) was an engineer named Jacco van der Worp. Van der Worp claimed that, plunging into Jupiter’s deep and increasingly dense atmosphere, the on-board Galileo electrical power supply – a set of 144 plutonium-238 fuel pellets, arrayed in two large canister devices called “RTGs” (Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators – see image and schematic, below) – would ultimately “implode”; that the plutonium Galileo carried would ultimately collapse in upon itself under the enormous pressures of Jupiter’s overwhelming atmosphere—
www.enterprisemission.com...