Students protest transgender invasion of privacy

So the little teenaged girls have no rights, because their thinking is wrong.

If their thinking was right, then it doesn't matter.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
So the little teenaged girls have no rights, because their thinking is wrong.

If their thinking was right, then it doesn't matter.

It doesn't pay to be normal anymore. As I quoted Creep Thumper earlier in the thread:

"ABNORMAL IS THE NEW NORMAL."

a reply to: DBCowboy

Their rights end where everyone else's begin.

I'm sure you've heard that before.

Actually hermaphrodites are in between and made by nature. there is a theory that many transgenders are actually mistakes made by th e doctoor when they were born when they guessed the wrong sex organs are corrected to assign to said baby to avoid a lawsuit by th e parents.

a reply to: 123143

It doesn't pay to be normal anymore.

I'm normaller than you are!

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy

Their rights end where everyone else's begin.

I'm sure you've heard that before.

Where does the transgendered persons rights end?

a reply to: DBCowboy
At behaving inappropriately, would be for starters. You could move on from there to rape and murder. No right to do any of those things.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DBCowboy
At behaving inappropriately, would be for starters. You could move on from there to rape and murder. No right to do any of those things.

Like I said, based on society's preconceived notions, their (the girls) right to privacy is now invalid.

It's negated.

it doesn't exist anymore.

originally posted by: [post=20189608]123143[/post
"ABNORMAL IS THE NEW NORMAL."

And does your wife, mother, daughter or sister wear pants, work outside the home or vote? "NORMAL" is not some fixed point in time. Ignorance fades and society grows. Tough for those that can't keep up or are rigidly locked in the past.

a reply to: DBCowboy

It's negated.

it doesn't exist anymore.

I understand how they can feel that way. I don't blame them.
But, in a communal locker room they never really had a "right to privacy" as far as other hetero girls, or lesbians, or transexuals goes. Never really did.

originally posted by: Freija

originally posted by: [post=20189608]123143[/post
"ABNORMAL IS THE NEW NORMAL."

And does your wife, mother, daughter or sister wear pants, work outside the home or vote? "NORMAL" is not some fixed point in time. Ignorance fades and society grows. Tough for those that can't keep up or are rigidly locked in the past.

What you label ignorance is actually adherence to nature's laws.

A penis does not belong in the girls' locker room. It's basic common sense if you are a decent person.

originally posted by: Freija
One thing is perfectly clear, nobody here has ever known a transgender child or faced the difficult struggles their parents deal with in trying to raise healthy and happy children.

Oh, but since trans kids are mentally ill aberrant freak of nature sexual predators, let's exclude, isolate and segregate them so they'll for sure know their place as broken deviant perverts when they grow up. Let's all do our best to dehumanize these kids and invalidate their identities and who they are and if we're really lucky, maybe they'll just all kill themselves so none of the "normal" kids have to be a little uncomfortable around people that are different through no fault of their own.

Having compassion for others does not mean their need would infringe on others rights to privacy and safety. And any decent teen ager who was alternative gender oriented, would get that. They would not even want to make the others wear their cross in life, because everyone has a different mix of crosses, and that is theirs, and feel unsafe and exposed in school. They wouldn't be so ego centric and wrapped up in their own feelings and think their rights can walk over others with steel toed boots, like little Nero's.

My children's safety at school and privacy is simply not negotiable and a medium to try and force someone's rights simply does not walk over the other's right to privacy and safety, within their own comfort levels. It does not and will never do so, no government can mandate that away. This isn't happening here but there would be hell to pay and I can't even legally say what would entail for a government to break its contract with the people and put my children or anyone's in danger.

a reply to: Phage

So the teenaged girls never had an expectation to privacy in the first place.

a reply to: Unity_99

Safety? Danger?





Yeah, these kids are really a threat to your daughters. Who is at the higher risk here?

a reply to: ketsuko
Now if we can get someone to ask Atlas a question, or kick in the shin.

Anything to get him to shrug.

a reply to: Freija

If you put lipstick on a pig it's still a pig.

Teenaged girls don't have a right to privacy in high school locker rooms.

Apparently.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Phage

So the teenaged girls never had an expectation to privacy in the first place.

Unless they had access to a private dressing area, no. In which case, they still would have that access.

As I've said, I can understand them feeling uncomfortable. But that is not a denial of a right.

a reply to: Phage

You don't see an issue with the violation of the dignity of the majority to accommodate a chosen few?

a reply to: Phage

If they have no right to privacy, then anyone can walk into the room. They have no right in a school locker room.

It'll be interesting to explore case studies about privacy rights in high school locker rooms.