In blockbuster poll, Sanders destroys Trump by 13 points

a reply to: tonycodes

Sanders is a pitbull, hilary is a puppet, she might look cute in the beginning, but Sanders will shred her when its all said and done!

Same thing happened with Ron Paul with me.

If you are backing Bernie you better know this.

You're going to get blue balled.

You're really gonna get schlonged..

a reply to: whyamIhere

Knowing the game is rigged, has an interesting effect on Sanders supporters, it Bernie or third party for a growing number of them.

Read this link see what I mean.

Sanders will be a popular write-in.

originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: whyamIhere

Knowing the game is rigged, has an interesting effect on Sanders supporters, it Bernie or third party for a growing number of them.

Read this link see what I mean.

When I learned about the Electoral College in High School I was pissed. What a scam.

Lots of Bernies supporters are very young. They don't want Hillary.

People want wholesale change. Electing Hillary is not change.

The link is interesting...Waiting until I can really get into it.

I can't see them voting for her. They will find anybody else.

Interesting times my friend...

a reply to: whyamIhere

To tell the truth I had quit voting Dems a few elections back and had planned a third party vote. The two party system is representing corporations and the elite to the point of destroying the middle class. Sanders is my only reason for considering voting democrat, and Hilary is an example of why I won't vote dem.

Sanders is quite aware of reddit and realizes he is sending a message to the youth and he knows he is polling strong with the millenials.

a reply to: AlaskanDad

Then why did he apologize to her over something his people found months prior? Because the MSM was waiting to release till it was a good time for her, not him.

I feel sorry for Bern to be honest but I think he is to politically entrenched. His outsider book was a good read but dont kid ourselves he is an insider.

a reply to: matafuchs

He apologized for the breach the actual intrusion into Clintons files by his campaigns data officer a few days ago. The first firewall glitch a couple months back the sanders campaign did not breach any file, rather they reported the problem to the DNC. When they cut off access to the server he said he would sue the DNC if they did not restore his access to the data server.

Wasserman Schultz says "he wouldn't dare sue".

He filed the suit in Federal court and Wasserman Schultz backed right down and restored Sanders data.

Then his supporters donated over a million the day this happened.

He owned Hilary and Waserman, that is why I called him a pitbull.

originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: matafuchs

He apologized for the breach the actual intrusion into Clintons files by his campaigns data officer a few days ago. The first firewall glitch a couple months back the sanders campaign did not breach any file, rather they reported the problem to the DNC. When they cut off access to the server he said he would sue the DNC if they did not restore his access to the data server.

Wasserman Schultz says "he wouldn't dare sue".

He filed the suit in Federal court and Wasserman Schultz backed right down and restored Sanders data.

Then his supporters donated over a million the day this happened.

He owned Hilary and Waserman, that is why I called him a pitbull.

Bernie shows why career politicians are a good thing. He knows exactly how the system works and won the fight when the establishment was against him. Because of his experience he could get things done, and as he showed in the debate he can be civil and polite while being tough.

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: AlaskanDad

Yeah, my wallet fears the hell out of the Bern. I cannot afford a Bernie Sander's presidency, nor do I want my children to grow up in an era of socialist horsecrap brought about by a bunch of self entitled little bastards in college who demand the world provide for them because they exist. We've had enough of that garbage from their parents... now is the time for tough love.

I haven't been able to afford any presidency so far, so moot point. If a bunch of kids want to be whiny then so be it, but my vote will be placed for much more important issues we have going on as a country. Crony Capitalism has been working well for these corrupt politicians. They have worked with the Banks, Wall Street, and corps to turn our own government into just another big business.

You say you can't afford Bernie, but he at least tells you his plans. What other candidate is being so transparent?

a reply to: intrepid

I would. Admittedly i identify as conservative but I'd be really surprised if hillary won reply to: intrepid

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: musicismagic

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: IAMTAT

Trouble with that is, if Clinton falls, she takes a LOT of people with her... likely even Obama, himself.

HIliary is an expert at chess playing. She has her soldiers ready if needed to protect her.

I think you give her too much credit. She's not that bright.

PLUS, her 'soldiers' know that the moment she gets in trouble, she'll throw them under the bus (sacrifice hr pawns) to save her big pantsuited A**!

I just don't want to see a witch in pants suits for the next four years.
Those pant suits are fugly.
As far as polls go they change to much daily. They would be more accurate if done monthly with a larger population of people.

It's such a shame that a self proclaimed "Socialist", who actually has advocated taxing the rich at 90%, could fair so well. It doesn't take a Rhodes Scholar to understand that any society needs top performers creating jobs to have a viable economy. When did it become a bad thing to be a top earner? When did it become a bad thing to be rich? I have never bought into the adage "The "Man" is keeping us down".
a reply to: AlaskanDad

a reply to: mdl59

Yet another person who calls Bernie a "Socialist" and moves along. Stop defending the people who are screwing you left right and center.

The issue is not "the RICH" existing, it is the OBSCENE wealth inequalit, with the .1% being as wealthy as the bottom 90%.

By the by, here is your short economics as to why Reagonomics e.g. Supply Side Economics e.g. Support Those Megacorps, They Create The Jobs, is a con. A lie.

What is the LAST thing a corporation wants to do?
That's right, create jobs. That is their LAST resort. They will only do when forced to due to a demand they otherwise cannot deal with.

Here's what happens if you cut taxes so a corporation makes an extra couple of billion a year: The corporation makes an extra couple of billion a year. The top execs and owners get massive bonuses. The lower rung workers? I'd be surprised if they saw a single cent of that tax cut.