Let’s forget the Trump sideshow for a minute and get down to the important issue:
Obamas flimsy speech and the war on ISIS
Which I'm sure the ptb were delighted in the Trump distraction
Not to send 10’s of thousands of troops to immediately exterminate ISIS is a cruel and cynical path.
The West’s air forces (US/Russia/UK/France/ Germany/even Japan/China [and even many Arab states]) and the east’s ground forces:
Syrian/Egyptian/Iraqi/Jordanian/Kurds/Turks in the right numbers can be rid of ISIS in 2 weeks if the leaders had the will.
Russia has the will and the way but the West, led by the spineless con man Barack Obama, still wants to play this out for all that it is worth…led
by some sinister factional inside power group that has Obama by the proverbial balls….and their squeezing hard!
No one ever thinks of the fact that the more ISIS is allowed to rule millions of people and the more they use this erratic bombing to slowly degrade
ISIS’ areas of rule only brings more suffering on the millions of people under their power as Obama’s tedious, slow, process of beating ISIS plays
out over, at this rate, years and years and years.
Read here about the suffering of the people under ISIS
www.cnn.com...
Russia tried to garner the support and momentum for such a force but the US batted it down, of course… with Obama’s slow, tedious, phony war on
ISIS as the polarization and hatred is agonizingly perpetuated by the very existence of ISIS day after day.
Obama is fighting to continue this unsuccessful torturous way to a victory that will not come unless massive ground power is unleashed on ISIS along
with massive air power as ALL military commentators have said.
If this process (the idea of an expeditionary UN force of 100,000) would have been initiated from day one, right now ISIS would be a bad memory.
But Barack Obama doesn’t have the leadership capacity to get himself out of a paper bag, let alone the audacity, capacity, vision and flexibility to
form this real life coalition, something any or most presidents would have been doing….Similar to what George HW Bush did in 1992 to remove Saddam
Hussein’s invading army from Kuwait…a very successful invasion that could be a model for what Obama should be doing.
But no, Obama wants to send 50 to 200 special ops. If they really send them around ISIS they could likely get captured and we’ll have the horror of
these religious gangsters slaughtering on of our men (God forbid) while Obama fiddles in the white house.
The cliché is constantly being put forth: we don’t need thousands of our troops again in Iraq and definitely Syria.
Even though three times when the US really wanted to win a quick war in the ME they succeeded without any real blowback: the war in Iraq in 1993; the
war in Afghanistan in 2001; and the 2003 invasion of Iraq (which was lost NOT on the battlefield but the way the US administered Iraq).
And anyway the troops for this coalition will NOT be exclusively western troops but ME troops included.
UK
Iraq
Iran
Syria
Egypt
Kurds
Turks
Jordan
Russia
France
American
Canadians
Australians
Crack brigades from each of these countries can beat ISIS in a month without many casualties.
Obama wants a cowboys and Indians long war of attrition that will cause more casualties; allow for unnecessary suffering of the people under ISIS, and
extend the credibility of ISIS in the Muslim world…
Indeed the Colon Powell doctrine of a massive force will win the war in a short time with less casualties than the Obama method and then a
international ME conference to adjust to the aftermath of ISIS can proceed.
The key to forming this coalition is American leadership which unfortunately is sorely lacking
So if this isn’t adapted, a clear and concise plan that will work, it must be that a certain faction amongst the powers that be DO NOT WANT A
SOLUTION!
edit on 9-12-2015 by Willtell because: (no reason given)
edit on 9-12-2015 by Willtell because: (no reason given)