It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The court’s creation would require an international treaty or a binding act of the United Nations to ensure its universal jurisdiction. Most likely, it would be adopted through a binding resolution of the UN Security Council, with the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon serving as precedents.
To be sure, the creation of such a court would face difficulties, the most important of which remains the lack of consensus on what constitutes the crime of terrorism. We propose adopting a “common-denominator approach.” In addition to encompassing the acts agreed upon in existing sectorial conventions, the ICT’s jurisdiction would be based on customary international law, taking into consideration intent (was the act intended to spread fear or coerce authorities), as well as the crime’s gravity and international character.
Establishing the ICT and imbuing it with legitimacy will require the support of civil society, academia and the general public. Obtaining this support will not be easy, particularly at a time when policymakers face so many other economic and strategic challenges. But we believe that a powerful legal instrument in the global fight against terrorism would quickly prove indispensable — easily justifying the effort devoted to its creation.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: NateTheAnimator
Don't we really already kind of have that? It's not law enforcement though, it's military.
originally posted by: NateTheAnimator
I personally have no problem with this, I find that this ICT is an inevitable reaction to an already out of control problem.
We already have become so economically integrated with trade deals like TPP and We have alliances like NATO. IS any of this really that bad? Only time will tell as the next chapter in humanity's story continues.
What say you ATS community?
originally posted by: boncho
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: NateTheAnimator
Don't we really already kind of have that? It's not law enforcement though, it's military.
The point is to dilute the peoples of the world so they're all the same, under the same local authority.
Don't we really already kind of have that? It's not law enforcement though, it's military
To keep Interpol as politically neutral as possible, its charter forbids it, at least in theory, from undertaking interventions or activities of a political, military, religious, or racial nature or involving itself in disputes over such matters. Its work focuses primarily on public safety and battling terrorism, crimes against humanity, environmental crime, genocide, war crimes, organized crime, piracy, illicit traffic in works of art, illicit drug production, drug trafficking, weapons smuggling, human trafficking, money laundering, child pornography, white-collar crime, computer crime, intellectual property crime and corruption.
Interpol is not a supranational law enforcement agency and has no agents who are able to make arrests.[17] Instead, it is an international organization that functions as a network of criminal law enforcement agencies from different countries. The organization thus functions as an administrative liaison among the law enforcement agencies of the member countries, providing communications and database assistance, assisted via the central headquarters in Lyon, France