Lights in the sky above LA

originally posted by: JimOberg
Note that the NAVWARN message runs through tomorrow night and was NOT cancelled after Saturday night's launch.

Oh and that leads me to another thing? Why is that NAVWARN msg you been posting dated for the 15th?

a reply to: proob4
I made the same mistake.
The stamp is for November 2015

originally posted by: JimOberg
a reply to: proob4

Why do you think it was intentional?

Maybe because if you and phage can both give testimony as to why it had that effect, I would think they would have that info to the effects before launch? Really?

a reply to: PhageOk I understand That. Thanks

a reply to: proob4
Again. Why do you think it was intentional? Don't you think that there could, just possibly, be other factors which determined the launch time?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4
Again. Why do you think it was intentional? Don't you think that there could, just possibly, be other factors which determined the launch time?

I think maybe i am being misunderstood, i mean the effects of the launch and how they was a huge aerial display and all that. Are you saying that the?y couldn't predict that but you and Jim both can explain these effects and the testers could not have expected these result's?

ETA: Basically i am saying they predicted the launch time to get the colossal visual effect this missile caused.

originally posted by: proob4

I just have to wonder what kind of nifty fireworks China, Russia, or even Korea might just show off in the coming weeks?

Pretty good chance that Russia had been informed about it. To avoid confusion.

a reply to: proob4

Are you saying that the?y couldn't predict that but you and Jim both can explain these effects and the testers could not have expected these result's?

No. I'm saying that they probably did not launch at that time just so that the launch would be observed. I'm saying there were probably other reasons it occurred at that time.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: proob4

Are you saying that the?y couldn't predict that but you and Jim both can explain these effects and the testers could not have expected these result's?

No. I'm saying that they probably did not launch at that time just so that the launch would be observed. I'm saying there were probably other reasons it occurred at that time.

I understand that, but give an example. Btw see my edit to add to see where I am coming from.

a reply to: DaMac

Similar color trail/tail as the Norway spiral.


Nice find DaMac

a reply to: proob4

I didn't need to see your edit. I figured that's where you were coming from.

Example? OK, guessing now, how about there was an observation satellite in the correct position at that time?

How about, they were sure there were no aircraft that shouldn't be there approaching the area at that time?

a reply to: proob4

Sea/Air traffic in the area would be fairly low at that time.

Some programs do select visibility, here's my data on the Russian ICBM warhead tests from Kapustin Yar to Sary Shagan -- I call them 'KYSS' missions --that have sparked some spectacular UFO videos in recent years, because half have occurred in this narrow 'twilight zone'. I don't know why.



The entire report is here --

www.jamesoberg.com...

Ok what I am trying to say is this Phage.
Are you trying to tell me and the great folks on ATS that they had no idea that launching this missile at that exact time would not cause a extreme colossal aerial display they way it did?

Even though you and Jim surmised early last night on the effects of the sun had on the plume of this missile and now you are saying they testers had no idea that this effect would not happen yet you both immediately knew of this effect?

Really?

originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: proob4

Sea/Air traffic in the area would be fairly low at that time.

I am talking about showboating mass civilian sightings.

a reply to: proob4

Are you trying to tell me and the great folks on ATS that they had no idea that launching this missile at that exact time would not cause a extreme colossal aerial display they way it did?

No. I am not saying that. I don't know how you can get that from what I have said.

I am saying that I don't think they launched at that time in order to produce the display. I am saying that I think they had other reasons for launching at that time. Clear enough?

a reply to: Phage

No that's not clear enough according to the info you gave me last night. Look i am going to hold off on posting any further till some others can chime in and see the deception you are trying to pull off on me.

a reply to: proob4

They didn't "showboat mass civilian sightings", they launched at that time for a reason. One of those reasons was that sea and air traffic was at a minimum then, so there wasn't much chance of interference with the launch.

a reply to: proob4

Look i am going to hold off on posting any further till some others can chime in and see the deception you are trying to pull off on me.

Heh. You're calling me a liar now?
You asked me what I think. I told you what I think.

a reply to: HomeyKXTA

Test Missle launched from Edward's AFB.
Just what more did Edward Snowden find out that they're willing to start a World War and arms race in his name?