It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not everyone getting a gun is out to kill a person. Everyone getting an abortion is
originally posted by: roadgravel
Men should not be the ones making the law on abortion.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: neo96
And to think the first 28 years of my life the background check never existed.
I wonder how Americans ever got along without it.
Yeah, but weren't you born around 1776 also???
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Not everyone getting a gun is out to kill a person. Everyone getting an abortion is
Abortions don't kill people. They terminate "potential" people.
Guns are made to exact lethal force, for hunting or for self defense. Abortion is a kind of self defense, "Stand your ground", if you will.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Not everyone getting a gun is out to kill a person. Everyone getting an abortion is
Abortions don't kill people. They terminate "potential" people.
Guns are made to exact lethal force, for hunting or for self defense. Abortion is a kind of self defense, "Stand your ground", if you will.
So you use the term potential people.
Though the State cannot override that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman's health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a "compelling" point at various stages of the woman's approach to term.
For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother
Just wondering where the potential people cut off is.
Abortions don't kill people the same way guns don't kill people...your argument is getting to be as bad as the OP at this point.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Vasa Croe
So you use the term potential people.
Not only me. That's what the Supreme Court uses, in Roe V Wade.
Though the State cannot override that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman's health and the potentiality of human life, each of which interests grows and reaches a "compelling" point at various stages of the woman's approach to term.
For the stage subsequent to viability the State, in promoting its interest in the potentiality of human life, may, if it chooses, regulate, and even proscribe, abortion except where necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother
www.law.cornell.edu...
Just wondering where the potential people cut off is.
See the above.
how can I fly like an eagle when I'm surrounded by turkeys"
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: ketsuko
So when does a "potential" person become a person?
A person is born into the world.