It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Hakenkreuz (better known as the Swastika) was originally intended to be a symbol of good luck, or if you take the Japanese Interpretation, that many people are united. Symbols change meaning over time, unfortunately. It's rallying banner of the LGBT movement, and has no place on government buildings.
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
Here's the funny thing.
When the rainbow flag was designed in 1978, it was not created for the sole use of the Queer community. The actual name of the flag is the Equality flag, with the colours used to symbolize that everyone everywhere fits somewhere under the rainbow, gay or straight.
Unlike the Confederate flag which is a pretty inclusive symbol to a (hopefully) small group, the equality flag is meant for everyone including your enemies.
That's why it shouldn't be removed.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
One is a flag of hatred and oppression.
The other is a flag of a movement for freedom from hatred and oppression.
I think there's a very large distinction there.
Christians need to remember. You reap what you sow.
If you are constantly condemning gay people. It's gonna come back at ya.
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
a reply to: yuppa
It's not too far of a stretch. Majority of the South, presently and historically, has been Christian. Some used the Bible to justify owning slaves because it was their "god-given right" according to the "good" book.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
One is a flag of hatred and oppression.
The other is a flag of a movement for freedom from hatred and oppression.
I think there's a very large distinction there.
Christians need to remember. You reap what you sow.
If you are constantly condemning gay people. It's gonna come back at ya.
The opposite could be argued on the Rainbow flag.
the Confed flag was seen by its supporters back then was seen the same way. It was in protest in their eyes against Northern Oppression. the only difference is your point of view.
Also... The confederate flag is nto a RELGIOUS ONE so how is it "christians fault?"
originally posted by: WarminIndy
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
I'm a Northerner anyway, the Confederate flag is of another country.
But how many other flags fly at our schools in California and Texas? That Mexican flag needs to go from schools.
How many people on ATS will say the flag of Mexico is appropriate and should be flown because of the large Mexican population?
This is the United States, the United States flag is to be flown on government buildings, and schools right now are government buildings, they are part of the communities, counties, states and country.
Gay pride flag? It is not the official flag of this country so take it down. Confederate flag? That's also of another country because the Confederacy WAS another country, seceded from the United States.
The first has a demonstrable history of a powerful group enslaving and oppressing a minority (Blacks).
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: WarminIndy
YUP, how about that Mexican flag?
originally posted by: MonkeyFishFrog
a reply to: ketsuko
I'm not calling it a Christian symbol. It is a racist flag. I'm just stating that it wouldn't be surprising or a stretch that some Christians stood behind the flag proudly at one time or another. Look at the KKK. They are a Christian organization that happily waves the Confederate flag in addition to their own.
Don't forget that the South has also the distinction of being the Bible Belt of America.
originally posted by: yuppa
The opposite could be argued on the Rainbow flag.
the Confed flag was seen by its supporters back then was seen the same way. It was in protest in their eyes against Northern Oppression. the only difference is your point of view.
Also... The confederate flag is nto a RELGIOUS ONE so how is it "christians fault?"