It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A strange fish rain in the Gollamudi village of Nandigama Mandal near Vijayawada shocked the villagers early in the morning yesterday. Hundreds of fish ‘rained from the sky and fell in the fields of the villagers, who collected them excitedly from their waterlogged fields and took them home.
As per the villagers, fish belonging to the Vallaga species and in varying sizes of 4 to 6 inches fell from the clouds along with the heavy downpour in the Friday morning.
The jubilance was such that the villagers even informed people belonging to their neighboring villages, who rushed to the fields on the outskirts of Gollamudi.
According to an environmentalist, fish rain is due to the displacement caused during rain and strong gales or tornados. The water from nearby rivers, canals, and fish tanks get displaced due to heavy wind and that fish does not fall from the sky.
Apparently, similar fish rain occurred in the 1970s in Srikakulam and Vizianagaram and often occur in foreign countries.
Recently the residents of Gollamudi village near Nandigama in India woke to a strange incident of fish raining down from the sky. Farmers of the village reported that fish had simply rained down from the sky.
Although there were no witnesses to it, farmers who went to their fields this morning saw fish squirming around in their fields.
Local people assumed that fish has rained down from the sky since there is no water body nearby. Interestingly, the fish were not of any local variety.
One assumption to explain such reports is that tornadoes build waterspouts and occasionally pick up creatures and transport them long distances before finally discarding them.
Another assumption is that the fish may have fallen into canals with the discharge of water from upstream reservoirs.
originally posted by: Lazarus Short
Of course, Charles Fort pointed out decades ago that these rains commonly involve single species of fish, frogs, or whatever. A storm, cyclone, or waterspout is not selective.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Lazarus Short
Of course, Charles Fort pointed out decades ago that these rains commonly involve single species of fish, frogs, or whatever. A storm, cyclone, or waterspout is not selective.
If a waterspout or cyclone is NOT selective, how is one species of fish picked up and dropped?
I wasn't replying to the OP. I was replying to someone else who stated something that Charles Fort never said.
originally posted by: Halfswede
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Lazarus Short
Of course, Charles Fort pointed out decades ago that these rains commonly involve single species of fish, frogs, or whatever. A storm, cyclone, or waterspout is not selective.
If a waterspout or cyclone is NOT selective, how is one species of fish picked up and dropped?
That is the point. A waterspout should pick up any assortment of critters. It makes the waterspout theory hold less water per se.
originally posted by: Bone75
a reply to: Lazarus Short
As a matter of fact, the fish rain I witnessed was a single species of little 3 - 4 inch silver fish. Weird huh?
I went from National geographic to pages directly about him. No, Amazon doesn't have drone delivery to me yet. I just dug deeper than the original article.
originally posted by: Lazarus Short
a reply to: reldra
Ah, National Geographic - but did you read his books?
originally posted by: Bone75
a reply to: Lazarus Short
As a matter of fact, the fish rain I witnessed was a single species of little 3 - 4 inch silver fish. Weird huh?