It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
www.breitbart.com...
A few things stick out to me from the clip and article.
1) the obvious line of "courageous and brave" probably wasn't a great thing to say, but was it intentional or did she trip over her words?
2) I would be interested to know if the guest is still sticking to the line of "he had help." The attack didn't kill anybody so it wasn't exactly a spectacular event, though it was rather ballsy. And one can find pretty much anything on the 'net these days. But...did he?
3) they have a quote from the DPD deputy chief saying "automatic weapons." So that opens up that angle of was it really? If so, how were they obtained? Or did the chief misspeak?
And yea I know it's breitbart, but the embedded video isn't theirs so...yea.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: texasgirl
Normally I'm the first to say "witnesses suck" but it's curious, isn't it? It would be nice to see some video showing either re van moving while somebody is shooting or two people shooting at once.
One of the things I had read Saturday morning was that possibly one shooter got back in the van and another shooter didn't. I never heard anything else about that, either. Aside from the "it was all one guy."
I'm not convinced enough either way, but it would be nice to get a clear, coherent timeline and some video to back it up.
originally posted by: KawRider9
a reply to: Shamrock6
That's what sticks out to me. He had the forethought to armor proof his van. Was able to plant and detonate bombs. Was able to get or modify a full auto. Was hellbent on revenge.
And when it was time for the deed... Nothing much happened???
Hard to imagine all the lanning he did was all for naught because of his ineptness