It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JimOberg
The most famous space UFO sighting up to that time, still widely considered a 'classic'.
Here's a retrospective interview with McDivitt about what he concluded he had seen.
[link removed]
originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: JimOberg
Ah yes..."probably" a piece of ice. And how is he calculating that "probability". This guy has no idea what he saw. He's been told, as all astronauts are, to trivialize the whole thing,.....
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: JimOberg
Ah yes..."probably" a piece of ice. And how is he calculating that "probability". This guy has no idea what he saw. He's been told, as all astronauts are, to trivialize the whole thing,.....
I know that theory makes defending your own notions easier [by disregarding inconvenient eyewitness testimony], but even Mitchell and Cooper make it clear there never any NASA directives on discussing anything they saw or any interpretations they wanted to tell anybody.
originally posted by: Urantia1111
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: JimOberg
Ah yes..."probably" a piece of ice. And how is he calculating that "probability". This guy has no idea what he saw. He's been told, as all astronauts are, to trivialize the whole thing,.....
I know that theory makes defending your own notions easier [by disregarding inconvenient eyewitness testimony], but even Mitchell and Cooper make it clear there never any NASA directives on discussing anything they saw or any interpretations they wanted to tell anybody.
Touche, Jim...they're lying about that by the way. All classified. You're once again not convincing anyone here. Especially when the "eyewitness's" best testimony states little more than a government-mandated half-hearted GUESS as to what the object was.
originally posted by: Urantia1111
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: JimOberg
Ah yes..."probably" a piece of ice. And how is he calculating that "probability". This guy has no idea what he saw. He's been told, as all astronauts are, to trivialize the whole thing,.....
I know that theory makes defending your own notions easier [by disregarding inconvenient eyewitness testimony], but even Mitchell and Cooper make it clear there never any NASA directives on discussing anything they saw or any interpretations they wanted to tell anybody.
Touche, Jim...they're lying about that by the way. All classified. You're once again not convincing anyone here. Especially when the "eyewitness's" best testimony states little more than a government-mandated half-hearted GUESS as to what the object was.
I went back and then I saw what the thing was. And really what it was, was a reflection of the bolts in the windows. The windows were made up of about three or four or five panes of glass, so that if one got broken we still had some pressure integrity. And these little things, when the Sun shined on them right, they’d multiply the images off the different panes. And I’m quite sure that that’s what this thing was. But anyway, I became a world renowned expert in UFOs. Unfortunately
Read the (pdf) link for more
WARD: So, to the best of your knowledge at the time and years later, there’s nothing abnormal or
unusual
—
MCDIVITT: No. There’s nothing unusual about this at all. It was just — it’s sort of like John Glenn talking about the fireflies . I mean, those were just pieces of ice crystals that were falling off the spacecraft. And the same thing with this. It was just something that I’m sure came off the spacecraft.
WARD: Well, one of the things that with increasing experience in spaceflight and the extreme lighting conditions and so on that has come clear over the years is that a lot of times things that you might think are large objects far away really are, as you point out, small objects that are very close
—
MCDIVITT: Oh yeah. They could be right up here in front of you. They could be right on the outside of
the window.
WARD:—and, therefore, would be out of focus in any camera picture you tried to take and wouldn’t
show up.
MCDIVITT: Absolutely. Yeah...
originally posted by: Thorneblood
a reply to: JimOberg
.....
I think its simpler than all that. While i agree there are reasonable explanations for some things it shouldn't be implied that all reasonable explanations are the truth and that those explanations should settle the matter.
....
originally posted by: easynow
Here's the video Oberg doesn't want you to see ...
Astronaut James McDivitt UFO Sighting
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: easynow
Here's the video Oberg doesn't want you to see ...
Astronaut James McDivitt UFO Sighting
I love it when easynow shows a video about McDivitt's Gemini-4 sighting that is illustrated by an image of an Apollo spacecraft in orbit around a different world entirely. Cosmic cluelessness on parade.